‘Nothing about us without us': co-production ingredients for working alongside stakeholders to develop mental health interventions

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2021.2020143
J. Bell, A. Lim, Rachel A. Williams, S. Girdler, B. Milbourn, Melissa H. Black
{"title":"‘Nothing about us without us': co-production ingredients for working alongside stakeholders to develop mental health interventions","authors":"J. Bell, A. Lim, Rachel A. Williams, S. Girdler, B. Milbourn, Melissa H. Black","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2021.2020143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Co-production involves researchers and people with mental health lived experience working together, addressing questions of community relevance. While co-production is underpinned by the tenet that stakeholders with lived experience have expertise and knowledge invaluable in designing research and service, there is a need to advance understanding of the role of stakeholders in co-producing mental health interventions. Method This study employed an inductive interpretative qualitative research methodology in investigating the ingredients for facilitating co-production between researchers and consumers within the context of developing an online mental health training program. Five stakeholders with lived experience or interest in mental health participated in a steering group, informing the development of the ‘Talk to Me’ Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). This program aimed to enable university students to improve their mental health literacy and communication skills. Steering group meetings were audio-recorded, and stakeholders engaged in an interview at the completion of their engagement exploring their experiences of co-production. Data were thematically analysed exploring themes relating to the co-production process and their experience. Results Themes relating to co-production and designing the MOOC were identified, including the need to develop a safe space, consideration of group dynamics, and ways of developing partnerships with stakeholders. Discussion Stakeholder feedback informed the language, content, and purpose of the MOOC prior to its release. Effective co-production in mental health research requires consideration, power-sharing, and planning to ensure that stakeholder involvement is productive and valuable.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.2020143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Co-production involves researchers and people with mental health lived experience working together, addressing questions of community relevance. While co-production is underpinned by the tenet that stakeholders with lived experience have expertise and knowledge invaluable in designing research and service, there is a need to advance understanding of the role of stakeholders in co-producing mental health interventions. Method This study employed an inductive interpretative qualitative research methodology in investigating the ingredients for facilitating co-production between researchers and consumers within the context of developing an online mental health training program. Five stakeholders with lived experience or interest in mental health participated in a steering group, informing the development of the ‘Talk to Me’ Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). This program aimed to enable university students to improve their mental health literacy and communication skills. Steering group meetings were audio-recorded, and stakeholders engaged in an interview at the completion of their engagement exploring their experiences of co-production. Data were thematically analysed exploring themes relating to the co-production process and their experience. Results Themes relating to co-production and designing the MOOC were identified, including the need to develop a safe space, consideration of group dynamics, and ways of developing partnerships with stakeholders. Discussion Stakeholder feedback informed the language, content, and purpose of the MOOC prior to its release. Effective co-production in mental health research requires consideration, power-sharing, and planning to ensure that stakeholder involvement is productive and valuable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“没有我们就没有我们”:与利益攸关方合作制定精神卫生干预措施的联合制作要素
【摘要】目的研究人员和有心理健康生活经历的人共同合作,解决社区相关问题。有实际经验的利益攸关方在设计研究和服务方面具有宝贵的专门知识和知识,这一原则是联合制作的基础,但有必要进一步了解利益攸关方在联合制作精神卫生干预措施方面的作用。方法本研究采用归纳解释质性研究方法,在开发线上心理健康训练计划的背景下,探讨促进研究者与消费者合作生产的要素。五名对心理健康有实际经验或兴趣的利益相关者参加了一个指导小组,为“与我交谈”大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)的开发提供信息。该项目旨在提高大学生的心理健康素养和沟通技巧。指导小组会议被录音,利益相关者在参与结束时接受采访,探讨他们的合作制作经验。对数据进行了专题分析,探讨了与联合制作过程及其经验有关的主题。结果确定了与合作制作和设计MOOC相关的主题,包括开发安全空间的需要、考虑群体动态以及与利益相关者建立伙伴关系的方式。在MOOC发布之前,利益相关者的反馈告知了MOOC的语言、内容和目的。精神卫生研究的有效合作需要考虑、权力分享和规划,以确保利益攸关方的参与富有成效和有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Is non-clinical, personal use of binaural beats audio an effective stress-management strategy? A systematic review of randomised control trials A qualitative assessment of community needs and views about discussing suicide The #BlueWhaleChallenge and presence of suicidal ideations on Polish-language Twitter Are professional counsellors and psychotherapists prepared to make a greater contribution to the Australian mental health workforce? A comparison of training content and mental health standards Ignored sufferers: a phenomenological inquiry into the lived experiences of postpartum depression among men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1