Cross-Platform Reactions to the Post-January 6 Deplatforming

C. Buntain, M. Innes, Tamar Mitts, Jacob N. Shapiro
{"title":"Cross-Platform Reactions to the Post-January 6 Deplatforming","authors":"C. Buntain, M. Innes, Tamar Mitts, Jacob N. Shapiro","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2023.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study changes in social media usage following the ‘Great Deplatforming’ inthe aftermath of the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol. Following theattack, several major platforms banned thousands of accounts, ostensibly tolimit misinformation about voter fraud and suppress calls for violence. At thesame time, alternative platforms like Gab, BitChute, and Parler welcomed thesedeplatformed individuals. We identify three key patterns: First, in studyingthe platforms that emerged among users seeking alternative spaces, we see highfrequencies of users bridging these communities announcing their intent to joinnon-mainstream platforms to their audiences on mainstream platforms. Second, focusing on platforms that were created to be alternative, anti-censorshipspaces, deplatforming preceded a sustained increase in engagement with Gabacross Twitter, Reddit, and Google search, while Parler saw a steep decline inengagement. Third, examining the language in these spaces, toxic discourseincreased briefly on Reddit and Twitter but returned to normal after the deplatforming, while Gab became more toxic. These results suggest that whiledeplatforming may precede a reduction in targeted discussions within a specific platform, it can incentivize users to seek alternative platforms where thesediscussions are less regulated and often more extreme.As these alternative spaces are often more political and extreme than their mainstream counterparts, deplatforming may drive single-platform improvements at the expense of the larger information ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study changes in social media usage following the ‘Great Deplatforming’ inthe aftermath of the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol. Following theattack, several major platforms banned thousands of accounts, ostensibly tolimit misinformation about voter fraud and suppress calls for violence. At thesame time, alternative platforms like Gab, BitChute, and Parler welcomed thesedeplatformed individuals. We identify three key patterns: First, in studyingthe platforms that emerged among users seeking alternative spaces, we see highfrequencies of users bridging these communities announcing their intent to joinnon-mainstream platforms to their audiences on mainstream platforms. Second, focusing on platforms that were created to be alternative, anti-censorshipspaces, deplatforming preceded a sustained increase in engagement with Gabacross Twitter, Reddit, and Google search, while Parler saw a steep decline inengagement. Third, examining the language in these spaces, toxic discourseincreased briefly on Reddit and Twitter but returned to normal after the deplatforming, while Gab became more toxic. These results suggest that whiledeplatforming may precede a reduction in targeted discussions within a specific platform, it can incentivize users to seek alternative platforms where thesediscussions are less regulated and often more extreme.As these alternative spaces are often more political and extreme than their mainstream counterparts, deplatforming may drive single-platform improvements at the expense of the larger information ecosystem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对1月6日之后的退台的跨平台反应
我们研究了在2021年1月6日美国国会大厦遇袭后的“大退台”之后,社交媒体使用情况的变化。袭击发生后,几家主要平台禁止了数千个账户,表面上是为了限制有关选民欺诈的错误信息,并压制暴力呼吁。与此同时,Gab、BitChute和Parler等其他平台也欢迎这些非平台人士。我们确定了三个关键模式:首先,在研究在寻求替代空间的用户中出现的平台时,我们看到高频用户连接这些社区,宣布他们有意加入非主流平台,并在主流平台上与他们的受众建立联系。其次,专注于那些旨在成为另类、反审查空间的平台,去平台化导致Gabacross Twitter、Reddit和谷歌搜索的用户粘性持续增加,而Parler发现用户粘性急剧下降。第三,检查这些空间中的语言,有毒话语在Reddit和Twitter上短暂增加,但在平台下架后恢复正常,而Gab变得更加有毒。这些结果表明,虽然去平台化可能导致特定平台内针对性讨论的减少,但它可以激励用户寻找其他平台,在这些平台上,这些讨论较少受到监管,而且往往更极端。由于这些替代空间往往比主流空间更具政治性和极端性,去平台化可能会以牺牲更大的信息生态系统为代价来推动单一平台的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#Asylum: How Syrian Refugees Engage with Online Information Who Does(n't) Target You? A Dataset for The Study of Online Radicalization Through Incel Forum Archives Detecting Misinformation: Identifying False News Spread by Political Leaders in the Global South @Who? Investigating Possible Errors in Studies Linking Survey and Twitter Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1