Leveraging Existing Approaches and Tools to Secure Climate Justice in Africa

Q3 Social Sciences Carbon and Climate Law Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21552/cclr/2021/2/4
E. Okoth, M. O. Odaga
{"title":"Leveraging Existing Approaches and Tools to Secure Climate Justice in Africa","authors":"E. Okoth, M. O. Odaga","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2021/2/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The African continent’s vulnerability to climate risks is increasingly evident, posing a challenge around the fundamental rights obligations of African states to their people at a time when most African countries are focused on narrowing their infrastructure and development gaps. Given the recent wave of strategic litigation on socio-economic rights, this paper will consider the extent to which climate litigation might benefit from a rights-based approach. The paper will also highlight the utility of administrative and judicial challenges of impact assessment processes. We argue that the participatory components of these processes are potentially powerful avenues for the empowerment of local communities on climate change risks and appropriate mitigation and adaptation measures.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/2/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The African continent’s vulnerability to climate risks is increasingly evident, posing a challenge around the fundamental rights obligations of African states to their people at a time when most African countries are focused on narrowing their infrastructure and development gaps. Given the recent wave of strategic litigation on socio-economic rights, this paper will consider the extent to which climate litigation might benefit from a rights-based approach. The paper will also highlight the utility of administrative and judicial challenges of impact assessment processes. We argue that the participatory components of these processes are potentially powerful avenues for the empowerment of local communities on climate change risks and appropriate mitigation and adaptation measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用现有方法和工具确保非洲气候正义
非洲大陆对气候风险的脆弱性日益明显,在大多数非洲国家专注于缩小基础设施和发展差距之际,这对非洲国家对其人民的基本权利义务构成了挑战。鉴于最近关于社会经济权利的战略诉讼浪潮,本文将考虑气候诉讼可能从基于权利的方法中受益的程度。该文件还将强调影响评估程序的行政和司法挑战的效用。我们认为,这些进程的参与性组成部分可能是增强当地社区对气候变化风险和适当的缓解和适应措施的能力的有力途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
European Union ∙ European Climate Policy: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Reparations For Climate Harm and The Role of The Loss and Damage Mechanism: Lessons from Other Areas of Law Bringing the Ocean into National Systemic Climate Litigation – Is Due Diligence a Bridge? Regulatory Approaches to Carbon Dioxide Usage and Storage in the European Union Indonesia ∙ The Voluntary Carbon Market and Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1