Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework and Course Design as Predictors of Satisfaction in Emergency Remote Teaching: Perspectives of Hospitality Management Students

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.20368/1971-8829/1135315
V. Patwardhan, Shreelatha Rao, K. Thirugnanasambantham, N. Prabhu
{"title":"Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework and Course Design as Predictors of Satisfaction in Emergency Remote Teaching: Perspectives of Hospitality Management Students","authors":"V. Patwardhan, Shreelatha Rao, K. Thirugnanasambantham, N. Prabhu","doi":"10.20368/1971-8829/1135315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Community of Inquiry (CoI) is a popular framework to measure meaningful engagement and communication in distance learning environments, where it is claimed that three interactive elements of presence (teaching, social, and cognitive) enhance the quality of education and learning outcomes. However, research suggestslack of empirical evidence on its efficacy in emergency remote teaching. Using a noteworthy research contribution on CoI as the central subject of this research, we examined its applicability in remote teaching environment as a predictor of student satisfaction. In doing so, we tested the proposition that course design variables mediate the relationship between CoI and student satisfaction. A theoretical model is developed and tested using data collected from 621 hospitality students from an Institute of Eminence in India. Students were electronically queried to capture the data within a 10-day time frame. The data collected using a 34 item CoI scale, 6 item course design scale, and 6 item online course satisfaction scale were analysed using structural equation modelling and PROCESS macro 3.4 - Model 4. Overall, the results showed that the proposed model fits the observed relationships and teaching presence is the primary determinant of satisfaction. Likewise, the results implied partial mediation by course design on the relationship between CoI elements and satisfaction. We believe that this model could serve as a guide to possible future studies to explore the relevance of CoI framework in emergency remote teaching. The outcomes provide significant theoretical and practical contributions to the key stakeholders to design a satisfying online curricula as part of blended learning for the post COVID-19 era.","PeriodicalId":44748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The Community of Inquiry (CoI) is a popular framework to measure meaningful engagement and communication in distance learning environments, where it is claimed that three interactive elements of presence (teaching, social, and cognitive) enhance the quality of education and learning outcomes. However, research suggestslack of empirical evidence on its efficacy in emergency remote teaching. Using a noteworthy research contribution on CoI as the central subject of this research, we examined its applicability in remote teaching environment as a predictor of student satisfaction. In doing so, we tested the proposition that course design variables mediate the relationship between CoI and student satisfaction. A theoretical model is developed and tested using data collected from 621 hospitality students from an Institute of Eminence in India. Students were electronically queried to capture the data within a 10-day time frame. The data collected using a 34 item CoI scale, 6 item course design scale, and 6 item online course satisfaction scale were analysed using structural equation modelling and PROCESS macro 3.4 - Model 4. Overall, the results showed that the proposed model fits the observed relationships and teaching presence is the primary determinant of satisfaction. Likewise, the results implied partial mediation by course design on the relationship between CoI elements and satisfaction. We believe that this model could serve as a guide to possible future studies to explore the relevance of CoI framework in emergency remote teaching. The outcomes provide significant theoretical and practical contributions to the key stakeholders to design a satisfying online curricula as part of blended learning for the post COVID-19 era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究共同体(CoI)框架和课程设计作为应急远程教学满意度的预测因子:酒店管理学生的视角
探究社区(CoI)是衡量远程学习环境中有意义的参与和沟通的一个流行框架,据称存在的三个互动要素(教学、社会和认知)提高了教育质量和学习成果。然而,研究表明其在应急远程教学中的有效性缺乏经验证据。使用值得注意的CoI研究成果作为本研究的中心主题,我们检验了其在远程教学环境中作为学生满意度预测因子的适用性。在此过程中,我们测试了课程设计变量介导CoI和学生满意度之间关系的命题。利用从印度卓越学院的621名酒店管理专业学生收集的数据,开发并测试了一个理论模型。以电子方式查询学生,以在10天的时间框架内获取数据。采用34项CoI量表、6项课程设计量表和6项在线课程满意度量表收集数据,采用结构方程模型和PROCESS macro 3.4 - Model 4对数据进行分析。总体而言,结果表明所提出的模型符合观察到的关系,教学在场是满意度的主要决定因素。同样,课程设计对CoI要素与满意度之间的关系具有部分中介作用。我们认为,该模型可以作为未来可能的研究指南,以探索CoI框架在应急远程教学中的相关性。研究结果为关键利益攸关方设计令人满意的在线课程提供了重要的理论和实践贡献,作为后COVID-19时代混合学习的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: SIe-L , Italian e-Learning Association, is a non-profit organization who operates as a non-commercial entity to promote scientific research and testing best practices of e-Learning and Distance Education. SIe-L consider these subjects strategic for citizen and companies for their instruction and education.
期刊最新文献
Key issues and pedagogical implications in the design of Digital Educational Escape rooms Symbols and Their Meanings Truth and Truths The Prehistory of Knowledge Ideas as Meanings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1