Taking Advantage of Natural Biodiversity for Wine Making: The WILDWINE Project

Albert Mas, Beatriz Padilla, Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso, Gemma Beltran, Cristina Reguant, Albert Bordons
{"title":"Taking Advantage of Natural Biodiversity for Wine Making: The WILDWINE Project","authors":"Albert Mas,&nbsp;Beatriz Padilla,&nbsp;Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso,&nbsp;Gemma Beltran,&nbsp;Cristina Reguant,&nbsp;Albert Bordons","doi":"10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fermentation processes have proceeded without microbiological control until starter cultures came up in 19th Century. However, in some processes, such as wine making a widespread use of starter cultures did not come up until the end of the 20th Century, when the cellar-friendly active dry wine yeast (ADWY) were available. However, this practice was challenged for the uniformity that brought a limited number of commercially available presentations and new tendencies in wine making have withdrawn the use of ADWY. The return to non-controlled wine fermentations may have considerable set backs especially in terms of economical losses, as these wines have much higher risks of presenting different levels of spoilage (presence of unwanted compounds that will be organoleptically detectable) that will not be acceptable for the consumer.</p><p>The WILDWINE Project (EU contract 315065) proposed a system to overcome the criticism on the uniformity after use of ADWY by bringing “wild” microorganisms to the starter culture practice. The Project proposed mixed cultures as an alternative to single strain cultures that is the usual practice for starter cultures. This multi-strain and multi-species starter cultures aimed at reproducing the vineyard natural microbiota with the advantage of a selection of those strains and species that could add complexity to the final wines. The WILDWINE Project has focused the selection of this “wild” microorganism in 5 worldwide-recognised wine regions: Nemea and Crete (Greece), Piedmont (Italy), Bordeaux (France) and Priorat (Spain). The basic protocol was the same for all the regions: (i) to establish the natural biodiversity of the regions and determine the “microbial fingerprint” of the region, (ii) oenological screening of all the strains and species isolates to determine their quality for the wine making process and (iii) to use the microbial cocktails at pilot plants and in commercial cellars to determine the “microbial footprint” that the “wild” microorganisms leave on the final wines.</p><p>In the Priorat region, a limited number of different strains from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were detected after sampling cellars and vineyards in two different harvests (2012 and 2013). These low number of S. cerevisiae strains is in sharp contrast with the high biodiversity observed in the same area 18 years before when a selection of strains of this species was preformed to provide a commercial “autochthonous” strain for the Priorat region. Furthermore, the main species found in the vineyards were the yeast-like fungus Aerobasidium pullulans and Hanseniaspora uvarum. A. pullulans disappeared when grapes were turned into must and then H. uvarum and Candida zemplinina were the main species. Minority species found in musts and later in wines were Metschnokowia pulcherrima and Torulaspora delbrueckii.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100063,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.002","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221078431630002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Fermentation processes have proceeded without microbiological control until starter cultures came up in 19th Century. However, in some processes, such as wine making a widespread use of starter cultures did not come up until the end of the 20th Century, when the cellar-friendly active dry wine yeast (ADWY) were available. However, this practice was challenged for the uniformity that brought a limited number of commercially available presentations and new tendencies in wine making have withdrawn the use of ADWY. The return to non-controlled wine fermentations may have considerable set backs especially in terms of economical losses, as these wines have much higher risks of presenting different levels of spoilage (presence of unwanted compounds that will be organoleptically detectable) that will not be acceptable for the consumer.

The WILDWINE Project (EU contract 315065) proposed a system to overcome the criticism on the uniformity after use of ADWY by bringing “wild” microorganisms to the starter culture practice. The Project proposed mixed cultures as an alternative to single strain cultures that is the usual practice for starter cultures. This multi-strain and multi-species starter cultures aimed at reproducing the vineyard natural microbiota with the advantage of a selection of those strains and species that could add complexity to the final wines. The WILDWINE Project has focused the selection of this “wild” microorganism in 5 worldwide-recognised wine regions: Nemea and Crete (Greece), Piedmont (Italy), Bordeaux (France) and Priorat (Spain). The basic protocol was the same for all the regions: (i) to establish the natural biodiversity of the regions and determine the “microbial fingerprint” of the region, (ii) oenological screening of all the strains and species isolates to determine their quality for the wine making process and (iii) to use the microbial cocktails at pilot plants and in commercial cellars to determine the “microbial footprint” that the “wild” microorganisms leave on the final wines.

In the Priorat region, a limited number of different strains from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were detected after sampling cellars and vineyards in two different harvests (2012 and 2013). These low number of S. cerevisiae strains is in sharp contrast with the high biodiversity observed in the same area 18 years before when a selection of strains of this species was preformed to provide a commercial “autochthonous” strain for the Priorat region. Furthermore, the main species found in the vineyards were the yeast-like fungus Aerobasidium pullulans and Hanseniaspora uvarum. A. pullulans disappeared when grapes were turned into must and then H. uvarum and Candida zemplinina were the main species. Minority species found in musts and later in wines were Metschnokowia pulcherrima and Torulaspora delbrueckii.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用自然生物多样性酿酒:野生葡萄酒项目☆
发酵过程在没有微生物控制的情况下进行,直到19世纪出现发酵剂。然而,在一些过程中,比如葡萄酒酿造,直到20世纪末,当酒窖友好的活性干葡萄酒酵母(ADWY)可用时,才开始广泛使用发酵剂。然而,这种做法受到挑战的统一性,带来了有限数量的商业上可用的演示和新趋势,在葡萄酒酿造撤回使用ADWY。回到不受控制的葡萄酒发酵可能会有相当大的挫折,特别是在经济损失方面,因为这些葡萄酒呈现不同程度的腐败(存在不需要的化合物,将被感官检测到)的风险要高得多,这将是消费者无法接受的。WILDWINE项目(EU合同315065)提出了一种系统,通过将“野生”微生物引入发酵剂培养实践,来克服使用ADWY后对均匀性的批评。该项目提出混合培养作为单一菌株培养的替代方案,这是通常的发酵剂培养方法。这种多菌株和多物种的发酵剂旨在繁殖葡萄园的天然微生物群,并具有选择这些菌株和物种的优势,可以增加最终葡萄酒的复杂性。WILDWINE项目将这种“野生”微生物的选择集中在5个世界公认的葡萄酒产区:希腊的Nemea和Crete、意大利的Piedmont、法国的波尔多和西班牙的Priorat。所有地区的基本方案都是一样的:(i)建立该地区的自然生物多样性,并确定该地区的“微生物指纹”;(ii)对所有菌株和物种分离物进行酿酒学筛选,以确定其酿酒过程的质量;(iii)在试验工厂和商业酒窖中使用微生物鸡尾酒,以确定“野生”微生物在最终葡萄酒上留下的“微生物足迹”。在Priorat地区,在对两个不同收获期(2012年和2013年)的酒窖和葡萄园进行采样后,发现了数量有限的不同酿酒酵母菌株。这些数量较少的酿酒葡萄球菌菌株与18年前在同一地区观察到的高生物多样性形成鲜明对比,当时对该物种的菌株进行了选择,为Priorat地区提供了一种商业“本土”菌株。此外,在葡萄园中发现的主要种类是酵母样真菌,如普鲁兰菌(Aerobasidium pullulans)和乌瓦菌(Hanseniaspora uvarum)。当葡萄变成葡萄时,普鲁兰单胞菌消失,而后以uvarum单胞菌和zemplinina念珠菌为主。在甜酒和后来的葡萄酒中发现的少数物种是Metschnokowia pulcherrima和Torulaspora delbrueckii。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the Nexus of Water/Food/Energy can be Seen with the Perspective of People well being and the Italian BES Framework Non Solo Cibo, Not Just Food: Which Compatibility between Consumers’ Ethical and Social Preoccupations and Trade and Commercial Law? Developing a Rating Model for Selection Solar Wood Drying Location A Preliminary Study on a New Approach to Estimate Water Resource Allocation: The Net Water Footprint Applied to Animal Products Grain Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1