Sublogarithmic uniform Boolean proof nets

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance CESifo DICE Report Pub Date : 2011-04-02 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.75.2
Clément Aubert
{"title":"Sublogarithmic uniform Boolean proof nets","authors":"Clément Aubert","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.75.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a proofs-as-programs correspondence, Terui was able to compare two models of parallel computation: Boolean circuits and proof nets for multiplicative linear logic. Mogbil et. al. gave a logspace translation allowing us to compare their computational power as uniform complexity classes. This paper presents a novel translation in AC0 and focuses on a simpler restricted notion of uniform Boolean proof nets. We can then encode constant-depth circuits and compare complexity classes below logspace, which were out of reach with the previous translations.","PeriodicalId":35380,"journal":{"name":"CESifo DICE Report","volume":"25 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESifo DICE Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.75.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Using a proofs-as-programs correspondence, Terui was able to compare two models of parallel computation: Boolean circuits and proof nets for multiplicative linear logic. Mogbil et. al. gave a logspace translation allowing us to compare their computational power as uniform complexity classes. This paper presents a novel translation in AC0 and focuses on a simpler restricted notion of uniform Boolean proof nets. We can then encode constant-depth circuits and compare complexity classes below logspace, which were out of reach with the previous translations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
次对数一致布尔证明网
利用“证明即程序”的对应关系,特瑞能够比较两种并行计算模型:布尔电路和乘法线性逻辑的证明网。Mogbil等人给出了一个对数空间转换,允许我们比较它们作为统一复杂性类的计算能力。本文提出了一种新的AC0转换方法,并着重讨论了一致布尔证明网的一个更简单的限制概念。然后,我们可以对恒深电路进行编码,并比较对数空间以下的复杂度类,这是以前的翻译无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CESifo DICE Report
CESifo DICE Report Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work and well-being Integrating Older Employees into the Labour Market – Evidence from a German Labour Market Programme How Does Firm Heterogeneity Affect International Tax Policy Implicit complexity for coinductive data: a characterization of corecurrence A type system for PSPACE derived from light linear logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1