Challenges in Predicting Child Outcomes from Different Family Structures1

W. Schumm
{"title":"Challenges in Predicting Child Outcomes from Different Family Structures1","authors":"W. Schumm","doi":"10.2466/03.17.49.CP.3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many studies purport to reveal the effects of family structure upon child outcomes. Important limitations in such research are discussed. First, many studies rely on current family structure, which overlooks the past environment to which a child was exposed. Therefore, little can be said about the “dose” of family structure(s) received by the child or how such exposures might have occurred at important developmental turning points in the child's life. Studies involving heterosexual and/or same-sex (LGBT) parent families often must deal with such limitations, and so are a good model for assessing how duration of exposure to different types of family structures and the child's developmental situation(s) during such exposures might affect outcomes. Literature examples are discussed, and one study is assessed in detail to demonstrate that in some cases, more information about how long a child spent in different family structures can be found through careful statistical detective work.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2466/03.17.49.CP.3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Many studies purport to reveal the effects of family structure upon child outcomes. Important limitations in such research are discussed. First, many studies rely on current family structure, which overlooks the past environment to which a child was exposed. Therefore, little can be said about the “dose” of family structure(s) received by the child or how such exposures might have occurred at important developmental turning points in the child's life. Studies involving heterosexual and/or same-sex (LGBT) parent families often must deal with such limitations, and so are a good model for assessing how duration of exposure to different types of family structures and the child's developmental situation(s) during such exposures might affect outcomes. Literature examples are discussed, and one study is assessed in detail to demonstrate that in some cases, more information about how long a child spent in different family structures can be found through careful statistical detective work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测不同家庭结构下儿童发展的挑战
许多研究旨在揭示家庭结构对儿童结局的影响。讨论了这类研究的重要局限性。首先,许多研究依赖于当前的家庭结构,而忽略了孩子过去所处的环境。因此,对于儿童所接受的家庭结构的“剂量”,或者在儿童生命的重要发展转折点,这种暴露是如何发生的,几乎没有什么可说的。涉及异性恋和/或同性(LGBT)父母家庭的研究通常必须处理这些限制,因此是一个很好的模型,用于评估暴露于不同类型家庭结构的持续时间和儿童在这种暴露中的发展情况可能会影响结果。讨论了文献实例,并对一项研究进行了详细评估,以证明在某些情况下,可以通过仔细的统计侦探工作找到有关儿童在不同家庭结构中度过的时间的更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Dissonance within the social self: exploring the effects of norm conflict between ingroups Receiving forgiveness in the presence of an attentive audience Would you like some coffee with your sugar? A natural field experiment on the efficiency and acceptability of setting zero sugars as a default in coffee-vending machines Weakening the ideological immune system: can debiasing techniques reduce confirmation bias? Prediction of dishonest behavior using the CNI model of moral dilemma judgment: a registered report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1