Operative Prognostic Scores for Pelvic Exenterations for Gynecological Cancer: When Should we Operate?

L. Sabiani, S. Knight, G. Blache, C. Jauffret, M. Buttarelli, E. Lambaudie, G. Houvenaeghel
{"title":"Operative Prognostic Scores for Pelvic Exenterations for Gynecological Cancer: When Should we Operate?","authors":"L. Sabiani, S. Knight, G. Blache, C. Jauffret, M. Buttarelli, E. Lambaudie, G. Houvenaeghel","doi":"10.26502/jsr.10020241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced gynecological cancer or local recurrence is in some cases the only option. Because of the impact of this major surgery, our objective was to identify prognostic factors in order to establish an operative prognostic score. Methods: Patients were characterized by age, type of PE (anterior, posterior, total, atypical, preservation of pelvic floor and perineal excision, extended or not to other structures), indication, curative or palliative surgery and prior radiation therapy. Results: Over 30 years, 277 patients were included. 3 and 5-years overall survival was 36.8% and 32.3%. The rate of non curative resection was significantly correlated with posterior PE (OR: 2.29), tumors extending to the lateral pelvic wall (OR: 2.91), PE requiring enlargement (OR: 2.61) and lack of radiotherapy or <45 Gy (OR: 1.73). In multivariate analysis, factors significantly impacting survival were: total PE (HR: 2.04, p <0.0001), extended PE (HR: 1.56, p=0.017) and lack of radiotherapy or <45 Gy (HR: 1.40; p=0.033). Based on these factors, we created 4 different groups in order to establish a pre and post-operative prognostic score. Overall 5-years survival for each group was respectively 48.7%, 29.0%, 28.7% and 14.8% (p <0.0001). A preoperative high score was a strong negative predictive predictor of overall survival (HR=3.01, p <0.0001). Conclusion: These scores could help to predict overall survival and help decide when to perform this surgery.","PeriodicalId":73961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery and research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jsr.10020241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced gynecological cancer or local recurrence is in some cases the only option. Because of the impact of this major surgery, our objective was to identify prognostic factors in order to establish an operative prognostic score. Methods: Patients were characterized by age, type of PE (anterior, posterior, total, atypical, preservation of pelvic floor and perineal excision, extended or not to other structures), indication, curative or palliative surgery and prior radiation therapy. Results: Over 30 years, 277 patients were included. 3 and 5-years overall survival was 36.8% and 32.3%. The rate of non curative resection was significantly correlated with posterior PE (OR: 2.29), tumors extending to the lateral pelvic wall (OR: 2.91), PE requiring enlargement (OR: 2.61) and lack of radiotherapy or <45 Gy (OR: 1.73). In multivariate analysis, factors significantly impacting survival were: total PE (HR: 2.04, p <0.0001), extended PE (HR: 1.56, p=0.017) and lack of radiotherapy or <45 Gy (HR: 1.40; p=0.033). Based on these factors, we created 4 different groups in order to establish a pre and post-operative prognostic score. Overall 5-years survival for each group was respectively 48.7%, 29.0%, 28.7% and 14.8% (p <0.0001). A preoperative high score was a strong negative predictive predictor of overall survival (HR=3.01, p <0.0001). Conclusion: These scores could help to predict overall survival and help decide when to perform this surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科癌症盆腔切除手术预后评分:何时该手术?
目的:盆腔切除术(PE)是局部晚期妇科癌症或局部复发的唯一选择。由于该大手术的影响,我们的目标是确定预后因素,以建立手术预后评分。方法:患者的年龄、PE类型(前、后、全、非典型、保留盆底和会阴切除、是否扩展到其他结构)、适应证、治愈性或姑息性手术以及既往放射治疗。结果:30年以上,纳入277例患者。3年和5年总生存率分别为36.8%和32.3%。不可治愈性切除率与后侧PE (OR: 2.29)、肿瘤延伸到骨盆外侧壁(OR: 2.91)、PE需要扩大(OR: 2.61)和缺乏放疗或<45 Gy (OR: 1.73)显著相关。在多因素分析中,显著影响生存率的因素有:总PE (HR: 2.04, p <0.0001)、扩展PE (HR: 1.56, p=0.017)和缺乏放疗或<45 Gy (HR: 1.40;p = 0.033)。基于这些因素,我们创建了4个不同的组,以建立术前和术后预后评分。两组5年总生存率分别为48.7%、29.0%、28.7%和14.8% (p <0.0001)。术前高分是总生存的强烈阴性预测因子(HR=3.01, p <0.0001)。结论:这些评分有助于预测总生存率,并有助于决定何时进行手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modulation of Inflammatory Response by Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Traumatic Brain Injury in Yucatan Swine. Understanding Fibrous Tissue in the Effective Healing of Rotator Cuff Injury. Critical Assessment of the Neurological Complications during High-Risk Anesthesia Procedures. Non-Tobacco Nicotine dependence associated with increased Postoperative Complications following Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. Health-Outcomes and Epidemiologic Research of Transgender Patients Requires Simple, Meaningful Diagnostic Codes: A Retrospective Review of California Emergency Department Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1