P4F-7 Integration of a Pressure Sensing Array Into Ultrasound Elastography

L. Kiessel, T. Hall, Jingfeng Jiang
{"title":"P4F-7 Integration of a Pressure Sensing Array Into Ultrasound Elastography","authors":"L. Kiessel, T. Hall, Jingfeng Jiang","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical in vitro tests and in vivo elasticity imaging have shown differences between breast tissue types in their nonlinear stress/strain behavior, which could be utilized to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions potentially reducing the benign biopsy rate. Stress and strain measurements are required for absolute measures of this non-linear behavior in vivo. A variety of tests were performed with a prototype pressure sensor array to gauge its stability, sensitivity and calibration in reference to its application in ultrasound elastography. Measurements on elastographic phantoms were also performed and compared to finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. In addition, data was collected from patients undergoing ultrasound elasticity imaging at the University of Wisconsin Breast Center. Initial tests show that the pressure sensor array is stable in an ultrasound imaging environment. A reliable calibration technique was also developed, with reproducibility to within 5% for most elements. Tests also show a wide disparity in sensitivity among elements. The best performing elements are capable of detecting pressure as low as about 100 Pa. The average minimum detectable pressure was about 800 Pa. This suggests that the array is capable of detecting initial contact and measuring the contact force during a deformation of the breast - a critical task for quantifying stress/strain nonlinearities. The preliminary clinical trial confirmed this prediction. However, surface pressure distribution measurements on phantoms have shown only modest agreement with FEA simulations. Geometric uncertainties on the surface of the sensor as well as the variability of the absolute calibration make the array ill suited to measure accurate maps of the surface pressure distribution which might limit its utility for elastic modulus reconstructions.","PeriodicalId":6355,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings","volume":"13 1","pages":"2046-2049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mechanical in vitro tests and in vivo elasticity imaging have shown differences between breast tissue types in their nonlinear stress/strain behavior, which could be utilized to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions potentially reducing the benign biopsy rate. Stress and strain measurements are required for absolute measures of this non-linear behavior in vivo. A variety of tests were performed with a prototype pressure sensor array to gauge its stability, sensitivity and calibration in reference to its application in ultrasound elastography. Measurements on elastographic phantoms were also performed and compared to finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. In addition, data was collected from patients undergoing ultrasound elasticity imaging at the University of Wisconsin Breast Center. Initial tests show that the pressure sensor array is stable in an ultrasound imaging environment. A reliable calibration technique was also developed, with reproducibility to within 5% for most elements. Tests also show a wide disparity in sensitivity among elements. The best performing elements are capable of detecting pressure as low as about 100 Pa. The average minimum detectable pressure was about 800 Pa. This suggests that the array is capable of detecting initial contact and measuring the contact force during a deformation of the breast - a critical task for quantifying stress/strain nonlinearities. The preliminary clinical trial confirmed this prediction. However, surface pressure distribution measurements on phantoms have shown only modest agreement with FEA simulations. Geometric uncertainties on the surface of the sensor as well as the variability of the absolute calibration make the array ill suited to measure accurate maps of the surface pressure distribution which might limit its utility for elastic modulus reconstructions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力传感阵列集成到超声弹性成像中的P4F-7
机械体外试验和体内弹性成像显示了乳腺组织类型在非线性应力/应变行为上的差异,这可以用来区分良性和恶性病变,从而潜在地降低良性活检率。对于这种非线性行为的绝对测量,需要进行应力和应变测量。针对其在超声弹性成像中的应用,利用压力传感器阵列原型进行了各种测试,以评估其稳定性、灵敏度和校准能力。还对弹性模态进行了测量,并与有限元分析(FEA)模拟进行了比较。此外,数据收集自在威斯康星大学乳房中心接受超声弹性成像的患者。初步测试表明,压力传感器阵列在超声成像环境下是稳定的。建立了一种可靠的校准技术,大多数元素的重复性在5%以内。测试还显示,不同元素的灵敏度差异很大。性能最好的元件能够检测低至约100pa的压力。平均最小可探测压力约为800pa。这表明该阵列能够检测初始接触并测量乳房变形期间的接触力-这是量化应力/应变非线性的关键任务。初步临床试验证实了这一预测。然而,对幻影表面压力分布的测量只显示出与有限元模拟的适度一致。传感器表面的几何不确定性以及绝对校准的可变性使得阵列不适合测量表面压力分布的精确图,这可能限制其在弹性模量重建中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
10B-3 Vibrating Interventional Device Detection Using Real-Time 3D Color Doppler P5E-8 The Method of Reverberation-Ray Matrix - A New Matrix Analysis of Waves in Piezoelectric Laminates P1D-4 Characteristics of a Novel Magnetic Field Sensor Using Piezoelectric Vibrations P5C-3 Field Simulation Parameters Design for Realistic Statistical Parameters of Radio - Frequency Ultrasound Images 2F-1 Fabrication and Performance of a High-Frequency Geometrically Focussed Composite Transducer with Triangular Pillar Geometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1