Non-pharmacological Intervention for Wandering Behavior in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Y. Kim, Eun-Geol Cho
{"title":"Non-pharmacological Intervention for Wandering Behavior in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Y. Kim, Eun-Geol Cho","doi":"10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aimed to explore the types of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing wandering behavior in patientis with dementia.Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Searching eight databases (Cochrane, Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, RISS, KISS, and KMBASE) yielded 899 related studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of these studies, using Revised Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials (ROB) 2.0 and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomised Study (ROBANS) 2.0, based on this study design. The Algase Wandering Scale related to wandering behavior reported the standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals.Results: A total of seven studies, consisting of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three quasi-experimental studies, met the inclusion criteria. Among non-pharmacological interventions, aromatherapy was the most common. However, therapeutic contact, therapeutic companion robot, tailored activity program, combining physical activity, memory recall, music therapy, and multisensory stimulation were also performed in one study, respectively. In a meta-analysis (RevMan 5.4), non-pharmacological interventions reduced wandering behavior in patients with dementia and mild to moderate functional impairments (p=.003).Conclusion: The result of this meta-analysis suggests that non-pharmacological interventions are generally associated with reduced wandering behavior among patients with dementia and mild-moderate functional impairment. However, it is necessary to develop a more detailed non-pharmacological intervention for patients with dementia and wandering behavior according to their disease stage and characteristics.","PeriodicalId":52377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to explore the types of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing wandering behavior in patientis with dementia.Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Searching eight databases (Cochrane, Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, RISS, KISS, and KMBASE) yielded 899 related studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of these studies, using Revised Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials (ROB) 2.0 and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomised Study (ROBANS) 2.0, based on this study design. The Algase Wandering Scale related to wandering behavior reported the standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals.Results: A total of seven studies, consisting of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three quasi-experimental studies, met the inclusion criteria. Among non-pharmacological interventions, aromatherapy was the most common. However, therapeutic contact, therapeutic companion robot, tailored activity program, combining physical activity, memory recall, music therapy, and multisensory stimulation were also performed in one study, respectively. In a meta-analysis (RevMan 5.4), non-pharmacological interventions reduced wandering behavior in patients with dementia and mild to moderate functional impairments (p=.003).Conclusion: The result of this meta-analysis suggests that non-pharmacological interventions are generally associated with reduced wandering behavior among patients with dementia and mild-moderate functional impairment. However, it is necessary to develop a more detailed non-pharmacological intervention for patients with dementia and wandering behavior according to their disease stage and characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆患者流浪行为的非药物干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本研究旨在探讨非药物干预的类型,并评估其对减少痴呆患者流浪行为的有效性。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。检索了8个数据库(Cochrane、Ovid-MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PubMed、PsycInfo、RISS、KISS和KMBASE),得到899项相关研究。两位审稿人根据本研究设计,使用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险评估工具(ROB) 2.0和非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具(ROBANS) 2.0,独立评估了这些研究的质量。与流浪行为相关的海藻酶流浪量表报告了标准化平均差异及其95%置信区间。结果:共有7项研究符合纳入标准,包括4项随机对照试验(RCTs)和3项准实验研究。在非药物干预措施中,芳香疗法是最常见的。然而,在一项研究中,治疗接触、治疗伴侣机器人、量身定制的活动计划、结合身体活动、记忆回忆、音乐治疗和多感官刺激也分别进行了。在一项荟萃分析(RevMan 5.4)中,非药物干预减少了痴呆和轻度至中度功能障碍患者的流浪行为(p= 0.003)。结论:本荟萃分析的结果表明,非药物干预通常与痴呆和轻中度功能障碍患者的流浪行为减少有关。然而,有必要根据痴呆症患者的疾病分期和特点,制定更详细的非药物干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
The effect of nurses’ knowledge and self-confidence on delirium nursing performance of nurses in an integrated nursing and caring services ward: A cross-sectional descriptive study Effects of sleep quality and physical activity measured by a Fitbit and self-rated questionnaire on the health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study Participation experience in self-care program for type 2 diabetes: A mixed-methods study Reflection on the Publications in the Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing (2014~2023) Prevalence and risk factors of delirium of older adults after cardiac surgery at the intensive care unit: A retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1