Peter Otto, ed., William Blake; Nicholas Shrimpton, ed., William Blake: Selected Poems

Q3 Arts and Humanities Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-07-20 DOI:10.47761/biq.264
Alexander S. Gourlay
{"title":"Peter Otto, ed., William Blake; Nicholas Shrimpton, ed., William Blake: Selected Poems","authors":"Alexander S. Gourlay","doi":"10.47761/biq.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one expects of Oxford University Press, these two new selected editions of works by Blake are competently and thoughtfully executed. One also expects critical and editorial conservatism from Oxford; although both editors have freshened the introductions and notes and organized the works in original ways, these editions offer few innovations even in comparison with Bentley’s 1978 two-volume Oxford edition. Indeed, it could be said that in presenting the visual aspects of Blake’s work the new ones are even less adventurous, in that there appear to be fewer supplementary images of Blake’s actual words and designs in the Otto volume, and except for a detail image of a page on the cover, none at all in Shrimpton’s. This apparent regression may be due to the advent of alternative means of promulgating Blake’s work, which have made clear color images of illuminated pages widely available, especially in the sophisticated and fairly inexpensive Princeton/​Blake Trust volumes, single-work facsimile editions, and, even more significantly, in the vast resources of the online William Blake Archive. Given that incorporating monochromatic snippets or even whole pages from illuminated books increases the cost and complexity of publishing, distorts the reader’s experience of the Blakean page, and provides only a small portion of Blake’s visual component, it makes sense for conventional publishers to refer interested readers to the archive or facsimiles rather than trying to convey the full visual aspect of his work in a mostly typographic text. That said, the recent editions of Blake works that combine thorough notes, full-size color images of all pages, and sophisticated transcriptions of the texts are much more satisfactory for most purposes than partially visual editions, and there is reason to wonder whether the world needs another collection that barely acknowledges the visual dimension.","PeriodicalId":39620,"journal":{"name":"Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47761/biq.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one expects of Oxford University Press, these two new selected editions of works by Blake are competently and thoughtfully executed. One also expects critical and editorial conservatism from Oxford; although both editors have freshened the introductions and notes and organized the works in original ways, these editions offer few innovations even in comparison with Bentley’s 1978 two-volume Oxford edition. Indeed, it could be said that in presenting the visual aspects of Blake’s work the new ones are even less adventurous, in that there appear to be fewer supplementary images of Blake’s actual words and designs in the Otto volume, and except for a detail image of a page on the cover, none at all in Shrimpton’s. This apparent regression may be due to the advent of alternative means of promulgating Blake’s work, which have made clear color images of illuminated pages widely available, especially in the sophisticated and fairly inexpensive Princeton/​Blake Trust volumes, single-work facsimile editions, and, even more significantly, in the vast resources of the online William Blake Archive. Given that incorporating monochromatic snippets or even whole pages from illuminated books increases the cost and complexity of publishing, distorts the reader’s experience of the Blakean page, and provides only a small portion of Blake’s visual component, it makes sense for conventional publishers to refer interested readers to the archive or facsimiles rather than trying to convey the full visual aspect of his work in a mostly typographic text. That said, the recent editions of Blake works that combine thorough notes, full-size color images of all pages, and sophisticated transcriptions of the texts are much more satisfactory for most purposes than partially visual editions, and there is reason to wonder whether the world needs another collection that barely acknowledges the visual dimension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
彼得·奥托,编辑,威廉·布莱克;尼古拉斯·施林顿主编,《威廉·布莱克:诗选》
正如人们对牛津大学出版社所期望的那样,这两本布莱克作品的新选集执行得很好,也很周到。人们还期望牛津大学在批评和编辑上保持保守;虽然两位编辑都更新了引言和注释,并以原创的方式组织了作品,但即使与1978年本特利的两卷本牛津版相比,这些版本也没有什么创新。的确,可以说,在展示布莱克作品的视觉方面,新的作品甚至更不冒险,因为在奥托卷中,布莱克的实际文字和设计的补充图像似乎更少,除了封面上的一页细节图像外,在Shrimpton的书中根本没有。这种明显的倒退可能是由于传播布莱克作品的替代手段的出现,这使得清晰的彩色插图广泛可用,特别是在复杂而相当便宜的普林斯顿/布莱克信托卷,单一作品的复制品中,更重要的是,在在线威廉布莱克档案馆的大量资源中。考虑到从彩绘书籍中加入单色片段甚至整页增加了出版的成本和复杂性,扭曲了读者对布莱克页面的体验,并且只提供了布莱克视觉成分的一小部分,传统出版商将感兴趣的读者推荐给档案或传真,而不是试图通过主要的印刷文本传达他作品的完整视觉方面,这是有意义的。也就是说,布莱克作品的最新版本结合了详尽的笔记,所有页面的全尺寸彩色图像,以及复杂的文本转录,在大多数情况下比部分视觉版本更令人满意,并且有理由怀疑世界是否需要另一个几乎不承认视觉维度的集合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly
Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly was born as the Blake Newsletter on a mimeograph machine at the University of California, Berkeley in 1967. Edited by Morton D. Paley, the first issue ran to nine pages, was available for a yearly subscription rate of two dollars for four issues, and included the fateful words, "As far as editorial policy is concerned, I think the Newsletter should be just that—not an incipient journal." The production office of the Newsletter relocated to the University of New Mexico when Morris Eaves became co-editor in 1970, and then moved with him in 1986 to its present home at the University of Rochester.
期刊最新文献
Cover and table of contents A Conversation with Helen Bruder Redefining Apocalypse in Blake Studies William Blake’s Annotations to Milton’s<br> <i>Paradise Lost</i>: New Evidence for Attribution William Blake’s “Introduction” to <i>Songs of Innocence</i>: The Role of the Pipe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1