Religious Affiliation and Wrongdoing: Evidence from U.S. Nursing Homes

Manag. Sci. Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4350
Aharon Mohliver, Amandine Ody-Brasier
{"title":"Religious Affiliation and Wrongdoing: Evidence from U.S. Nursing Homes","authors":"Aharon Mohliver, Amandine Ody-Brasier","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the relationship between organizational religious affiliation and wrongdoing using a unique data set on inspections in 16,101 nursing homes over five years. We find that violations of standards of care are more severe in religiously affiliated homes. We track this difference to a reduction in the likelihood that organizational members file complaints rather than poorer behaving caretakers or differential treatment by enforcement agents. Fewer complaints increase the time that religiously affiliated homes operate without monitoring, which allows violations to escalate before they are detected. Our findings highlight an understudied process in the literature on organizational wrongdoing: Although much attention has been devoted to how inspector bias can lead to incorrect conclusions about the true rates of wrongdoing across organizations, religious affiliation can lead to similarly incorrect conclusions—but through an internal organizational process. This paper was accepted by Lamar Pierce, organizations.","PeriodicalId":18208,"journal":{"name":"Manag. Sci.","volume":"5 1","pages":"533-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manag. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We explore the relationship between organizational religious affiliation and wrongdoing using a unique data set on inspections in 16,101 nursing homes over five years. We find that violations of standards of care are more severe in religiously affiliated homes. We track this difference to a reduction in the likelihood that organizational members file complaints rather than poorer behaving caretakers or differential treatment by enforcement agents. Fewer complaints increase the time that religiously affiliated homes operate without monitoring, which allows violations to escalate before they are detected. Our findings highlight an understudied process in the literature on organizational wrongdoing: Although much attention has been devoted to how inspector bias can lead to incorrect conclusions about the true rates of wrongdoing across organizations, religious affiliation can lead to similarly incorrect conclusions—but through an internal organizational process. This paper was accepted by Lamar Pierce, organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教信仰与不法行为:来自美国养老院的证据
我们利用一组独特的数据集,对16,101家养老院进行了五年的检查,探讨了组织宗教信仰与不法行为之间的关系。我们发现,在有宗教信仰的家庭中,违反护理标准的情况更为严重。我们将这种差异追踪到减少组织成员提出投诉的可能性,而不是减少行为较差的看护人或执法人员的差别待遇。投诉的减少增加了宗教附属家庭在没有监控的情况下运作的时间,这使得违规行为在被发现之前升级。我们的发现强调了组织不法行为文献中一个未被充分研究的过程:尽管很多人都在关注检查员的偏见如何导致有关组织中不法行为真实发生率的错误结论,但宗教信仰也会导致类似的错误结论——但这是通过组织内部的过程来实现的。这篇论文被Lamar Pierce组织接受了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disclosure in Incentivized Reviews: Does It Protect Consumers? Can Blockchain Technology Help Overcome Contractual Incompleteness? Evidence from State Laws Utility Tokens, Network Effects, and Pricing Power Decentralized Platforms: Governance, Tokenomics, and ICO Design The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1