PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbations

Tianle Zhang, Wenjie Ruan, J. Fieldsend
{"title":"PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbations","authors":"Tianle Zhang, Wenjie Ruan, J. Fieldsend","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2207.02036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In safety-critical deep learning applications robustness measurement is a vital pre-deployment phase. However, existing robustness verification methods are not sufficiently practical for deploying machine learning systems in the real world. On the one hand, these methods attempt to claim that no perturbations can ``fool'' deep neural networks (DNNs), which may be too stringent in practice. On the other hand, existing works rigorously consider $L_p$ bounded additive perturbations on the pixel space, although perturbations, such as colour shifting and geometric transformations, are more practically and frequently occurring in the real world. Thus, from the practical standpoint, we present a novel and general {\\it probabilistic robustness assessment method} (PRoA) based on the adaptive concentration, and it can measure the robustness of deep learning models against functional perturbations. PRoA can provide statistical guarantees on the probabilistic robustness of a model, \\textit{i.e.}, the probability of failure encountered by the trained model after deployment. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of PRoA in terms of evaluating the probabilistic robustness against a broad range of functional perturbations, and PRoA can scale well to various large-scale deep neural networks compared to existing state-of-the-art baselines. For the purpose of reproducibility, we release our tool on GitHub: \\url{ https://github.com/TrustAI/PRoA}.","PeriodicalId":74091,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases : European Conference, ECML PKDD ... : proceedings. ECML PKDD (Conference)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases : European Conference, ECML PKDD ... : proceedings. ECML PKDD (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.02036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In safety-critical deep learning applications robustness measurement is a vital pre-deployment phase. However, existing robustness verification methods are not sufficiently practical for deploying machine learning systems in the real world. On the one hand, these methods attempt to claim that no perturbations can ``fool'' deep neural networks (DNNs), which may be too stringent in practice. On the other hand, existing works rigorously consider $L_p$ bounded additive perturbations on the pixel space, although perturbations, such as colour shifting and geometric transformations, are more practically and frequently occurring in the real world. Thus, from the practical standpoint, we present a novel and general {\it probabilistic robustness assessment method} (PRoA) based on the adaptive concentration, and it can measure the robustness of deep learning models against functional perturbations. PRoA can provide statistical guarantees on the probabilistic robustness of a model, \textit{i.e.}, the probability of failure encountered by the trained model after deployment. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of PRoA in terms of evaluating the probabilistic robustness against a broad range of functional perturbations, and PRoA can scale well to various large-scale deep neural networks compared to existing state-of-the-art baselines. For the purpose of reproducibility, we release our tool on GitHub: \url{ https://github.com/TrustAI/PRoA}.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对功能扰动的概率鲁棒性评估
在安全关键型深度学习应用中,鲁棒性测量是重要的部署前阶段。然而,现有的鲁棒性验证方法对于在现实世界中部署机器学习系统并不足够实用。一方面,这些方法试图声称没有扰动可以“欺骗”深度神经网络(dnn),这在实践中可能过于严格。另一方面,现有的作品严格考虑$L_p$像素空间上的有界加性扰动,尽管扰动,如颜色移动和几何变换,在现实世界中更实际和频繁地发生。因此,从实际应用的角度出发,我们提出了一种基于自适应集中的新型通用{\it概率鲁棒性评估方法}(PRoA),它可以衡量深度学习模型对功能扰动的鲁棒性。PRoA可以为模型的概率鲁棒性提供统计保证,\textit{即}训练后的模型在部署后遇到故障的概率。我们的实验证明了PRoA在评估针对广泛功能扰动的概率鲁棒性方面的有效性和灵活性,并且与现有的最先进基线相比,PRoA可以很好地扩展到各种大规模深度神经网络。为了重现性,我们在GitHub上发布了我们的工具:\url{ https://github.com/TrustAI/PRoA}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining Full-disk Deep Learning Model for Solar Flare Prediction using Attribution Methods Offline Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Q-Function Regularization Visualizing Overlapping Biclusterings and Boolean Matrix Factorizations An Examination of Wearable Sensors and Video Data Capture for Human Exercise Classification Online Network Source Optimization with Graph-Kernel MAB
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1