The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International Education in Business Pub Date : 2020-05-30 DOI:10.1108/jieb-02-2020-0017
Hayward P. Andres
{"title":"The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance","authors":"Hayward P. Andres","doi":"10.1108/jieb-02-2020-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate a theoretical framework that examines and extends understanding of the role of cognitive/information processing, learning motivation and learning task behaviors in facilitating student engagement, course persistence and academic performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nStudent subjects were used to collect survey data. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the impact of active teaching, academic self-efficacy and task avoidance on the dependent variables – course grade, course persistence and expectancy for success.\n\n\nFindings\nActive teaching and academic self-efficacy were positive predictors of course grade while task avoidance was a negative predictor of course grade. Course persistence was positively impacted by academic self-efficacy and diminished by task-avoidance behaviors. Academic self-efficacy was shown to positively impact expectancy for success.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results confirm the importance of adopting active teaching techniques, the need for periodic opportunities for experienced academic success and the need for coaching on self-regulation of study habits and class attendance behaviors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study builds on prior calls for more investigations on the role of teaching style on student psychological responses, engagement, learning task behaviors and academic performance. The teaching and learning processes were examined on four levels – attention/engagement, encoding, processing/synthesizing and learning task behaviors. In addition, prior work was extended by incorporating behavioral indicators (e.g. task avoidance) of learning motivation as opposed to reliance on self-reported levels of motivation that may have not been consistent with actual behaviors.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-02-2020-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate a theoretical framework that examines and extends understanding of the role of cognitive/information processing, learning motivation and learning task behaviors in facilitating student engagement, course persistence and academic performance. Design/methodology/approach Student subjects were used to collect survey data. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the impact of active teaching, academic self-efficacy and task avoidance on the dependent variables – course grade, course persistence and expectancy for success. Findings Active teaching and academic self-efficacy were positive predictors of course grade while task avoidance was a negative predictor of course grade. Course persistence was positively impacted by academic self-efficacy and diminished by task-avoidance behaviors. Academic self-efficacy was shown to positively impact expectancy for success. Practical implications The results confirm the importance of adopting active teaching techniques, the need for periodic opportunities for experienced academic success and the need for coaching on self-regulation of study habits and class attendance behaviors. Originality/value This study builds on prior calls for more investigations on the role of teaching style on student psychological responses, engagement, learning task behaviors and academic performance. The teaching and learning processes were examined on four levels – attention/engagement, encoding, processing/synthesizing and learning task behaviors. In addition, prior work was extended by incorporating behavioral indicators (e.g. task avoidance) of learning motivation as opposed to reliance on self-reported levels of motivation that may have not been consistent with actual behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动教学、学业自我效能感和学习行为在学生成绩中的作用
本研究旨在探讨认知/信息加工、学习动机和学习任务行为在促进学生参与、课程坚持和学习成绩中的作用的理论框架。设计/方法/方法使用学生受试者收集调查数据。采用层次回归分析检验了主动教学、学业自我效能感和任务回避对因变量课程成绩、课程坚持度和成功期望的影响。研究发现:积极教学和学业自我效能感是课程成绩的正向预测因子,任务回避是课程成绩的负向预测因子。学业自我效能对课程坚持有正向影响,任务回避行为对课程坚持有正向影响。学术自我效能被证明对成功的期望有积极的影响。实践意义:研究结果证实了采用积极的教学技巧的重要性,需要定期提供学习成功经验的机会,以及需要对学习习惯和上课行为的自我调节进行指导。原创性/价值本研究建立在先前对教学风格对学生心理反应、参与、学习任务行为和学习成绩的作用进行更多调查的基础上。从注意/投入、编码、加工/综合和学习任务行为四个层面考察教学过程。此外,通过纳入学习动机的行为指标(如任务回避)来扩展先前的工作,而不是依赖于可能与实际行为不一致的自我报告的动机水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing business education: neurodiversity informed faculty development practices Teaching and learning in business schools post-pandemic: a digital future Short-term study abroad (STSA): a review of key risks and challenges Faculty-Led Program: Food and Beverage Supply Chain – from the first mile to the last mile Project management education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a multi-method approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1