Six different surgical method options according to etiology in repair of arteriovenous fistula aneurysms

M. Işık, Ömer Tanyeli̇
{"title":"Six different surgical method options according to etiology in repair of arteriovenous fistula aneurysms","authors":"M. Işık, Ömer Tanyeli̇","doi":"10.9739/tjvs2022.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to evaluate the considerations that should be taken into account when choosing a surgical method and the early results of six methods used for repair in patients who underwent surgical repair due to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) aneurysms. Material and Methods: One hundred and five patients who underwent AVF aneurysm repair between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Methods for surgical repair were used according to the etiology: Plication, Arteriotomy constrictions and plication, Aneurysm excision and creation of a new fistula, Saphenous vein or synthetic graft interposition, End-to-end anastomosis and plication after aneurysm excision, Banding method. Results: Sixty-one of the cases were male and 44 were female. The mean age was 56.6 (27-75) years. The total number of surgeries was 119, including the surgeries and reoperations performed in 2 planned sessions. As surgical method, 44 Plication, 13 Arteriotomy constrictions and plication, 10 Aneurysm excision and creation of a new fistula, 25 Saphenous vein or synthetic graft interposition, 13 End-to-end anastomosis and plication after aneurysm excision and 14 Banding methods were used. AVF flow of 38 patients was measured to be over 1700 ml/min, and 34 of these patients had an arteriotomy length of more than 7 mm. In patients who underwent repair due to high flow rate, an average of 30-65% flow reduction was achieved compared to the preoperative period. In the first postoperative 3 months, 7 (6%) patients required reoperation. Fistula loss did not occur in any of the patients who underwent repair. Conclusion: The etiology of aneurysm, flow rate, aneurysm localization, and the presence of intimal hyperplasia or chronic thrombus are important in choosing an aneurysm repair method. We think that the results will be positively affected if the surgical method is determined according to the association of one or few of these factors.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs2022.10.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the considerations that should be taken into account when choosing a surgical method and the early results of six methods used for repair in patients who underwent surgical repair due to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) aneurysms. Material and Methods: One hundred and five patients who underwent AVF aneurysm repair between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Methods for surgical repair were used according to the etiology: Plication, Arteriotomy constrictions and plication, Aneurysm excision and creation of a new fistula, Saphenous vein or synthetic graft interposition, End-to-end anastomosis and plication after aneurysm excision, Banding method. Results: Sixty-one of the cases were male and 44 were female. The mean age was 56.6 (27-75) years. The total number of surgeries was 119, including the surgeries and reoperations performed in 2 planned sessions. As surgical method, 44 Plication, 13 Arteriotomy constrictions and plication, 10 Aneurysm excision and creation of a new fistula, 25 Saphenous vein or synthetic graft interposition, 13 End-to-end anastomosis and plication after aneurysm excision and 14 Banding methods were used. AVF flow of 38 patients was measured to be over 1700 ml/min, and 34 of these patients had an arteriotomy length of more than 7 mm. In patients who underwent repair due to high flow rate, an average of 30-65% flow reduction was achieved compared to the preoperative period. In the first postoperative 3 months, 7 (6%) patients required reoperation. Fistula loss did not occur in any of the patients who underwent repair. Conclusion: The etiology of aneurysm, flow rate, aneurysm localization, and the presence of intimal hyperplasia or chronic thrombus are important in choosing an aneurysm repair method. We think that the results will be positively affected if the surgical method is determined according to the association of one or few of these factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据病因选择六种不同的手术方法修复动静脉瘘动脉瘤
目的:本研究旨在评价动静脉瘘(AVF)动脉瘤行手术修复的患者在选择手术方法时应考虑的因素以及六种修复方法的早期效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2012年至2020年间接受AVF动脉瘤修复术的105例患者。根据病因选择手术修复方法:动脉瘤扩张、动脉切开收缩和扩张、动脉瘤切除并建立新瘘、隐静脉或合成移植物间置、动脉瘤切除后端到端吻合和扩张、捆扎法。结果:男61例,女44例。平均年龄56.6岁(27-75岁)。手术总数119例,包括2期手术及再手术。手术方式44例,动脉切开缩窄及折叠13例,动脉瘤切除及新造瘘10例,隐静脉或人工移植物间置25例,动脉瘤切除后端到端吻合及折叠13例,带状法14例。38例患者的AVF流量大于1700 ml/min,其中34例患者的动脉切开长度大于7 mm。在因高血流率而进行修复的患者中,与术前相比,平均血流减少了30-65%。术后3个月内,7例(6%)患者需要再次手术。所有接受修复的患者均未发生瘘道丢失。结论:动脉瘤的病因、血流速率、动脉瘤的定位、是否存在内膜增生或慢性血栓是选择动脉瘤修复方法的重要因素。我们认为,如果根据这些因素中的一个或几个因素的关联来确定手术方法,将对结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undesirable complication after transradial coronary angiography: A case report The factors influencing compliance in post-EVAR surveillance regarding the perspectives of practitioners and patients Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency in nurses in Türkiye - NueVo TR Investigation of factors affecting reintervention after type A aortic dissection Carotid-subclavian bypass in the treatment of subclavian artery occlusion during epidermoid cyst excision: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1