Effect of Bi-/Unilateral Masticatory Training on Memory and Concentration - Assessor-blind, Cross-over, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Jun-hyeong Bae, Hyungsuk Kim, Dongwan Kang, Hyeji Kim, Jongyeon Kim, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, Mi-yeon Song, W. Chung
{"title":"Effect of Bi-/Unilateral Masticatory Training on Memory and Concentration - Assessor-blind, Cross-over, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial","authors":"Jun-hyeong Bae, Hyungsuk Kim, Dongwan Kang, Hyeji Kim, Jongyeon Kim, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, Mi-yeon Song, W. Chung","doi":"10.13048/jkm.22020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to explore the short-term effects of bilateral masticatory training using an intraoral device on memory and concentration, which is an advanced form of Gochi, compared to the unilateral form with gum.Methods: Thirty young healthy participants (age, 16–30 years) were screened and randomly assigned to one of two sequences in a crossover design. The participants assigned to sequence A (n=15) performed bilateral mastication using an intraoral device with a total of 300 taps, followed by unilateral mastication using gum with the same number of repetitions and frequency, separated by a 7-day washout period. A reverse order was used for sequence B. The primary and secondary outcomes were the digit span test result and the symbol digit modality test and the word list recallresults, respectively, which were conducted before and after each intervention.Results: Symbol digit modality test scores increased by 12.03±8.33 with bilateral mastication, which was significantly higher than that obtained with chewing gum (5.17 points;95% confidence interval: 0.99, 9.34; p<0.05). Changes in the digit span test and word list recall scores were not significantly different between the two groups. In the digit span test forward, symbol digit modality test, and word list recall test, bilateral mastication was not inferior to unilateral mastication in improving memory and concentration.Conclusions: Bilateral masticatory exercises using an intraoral device are not inferior to unilateral mastication with gum for improving memory in healthy young individuals. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of bilateral masticatory training on cognitive function.","PeriodicalId":16164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.22020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the short-term effects of bilateral masticatory training using an intraoral device on memory and concentration, which is an advanced form of Gochi, compared to the unilateral form with gum.Methods: Thirty young healthy participants (age, 16–30 years) were screened and randomly assigned to one of two sequences in a crossover design. The participants assigned to sequence A (n=15) performed bilateral mastication using an intraoral device with a total of 300 taps, followed by unilateral mastication using gum with the same number of repetitions and frequency, separated by a 7-day washout period. A reverse order was used for sequence B. The primary and secondary outcomes were the digit span test result and the symbol digit modality test and the word list recallresults, respectively, which were conducted before and after each intervention.Results: Symbol digit modality test scores increased by 12.03±8.33 with bilateral mastication, which was significantly higher than that obtained with chewing gum (5.17 points;95% confidence interval: 0.99, 9.34; p<0.05). Changes in the digit span test and word list recall scores were not significantly different between the two groups. In the digit span test forward, symbol digit modality test, and word list recall test, bilateral mastication was not inferior to unilateral mastication in improving memory and concentration.Conclusions: Bilateral masticatory exercises using an intraoral device are not inferior to unilateral mastication with gum for improving memory in healthy young individuals. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of bilateral masticatory training on cognitive function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双/单侧咀嚼训练对记忆和注意力的影响——评估盲、交叉、随机对照临床试验
目的:本研究旨在探讨使用口腔内装置的双侧咀嚼训练对记忆和注意力的短期影响,这是一种高级形式的Gochi,与单侧形式的口香糖相比。方法:筛选30名年轻健康参与者(16-30岁),并在交叉设计中随机分配到两个序列之一。被分配到序列A的参与者(n=15)使用口腔内装置进行双侧咀嚼,共300次,然后使用口香糖进行单侧咀嚼,重复次数和频率相同,间隔7天的洗脱期。在每次干预前和干预后分别进行数字广度测试结果、符号数字模态测试结果和单词列表回忆结果。结果:双侧咀嚼组符号手指模态测试得分提高12.03±8.33分,显著高于咀嚼组(5.17分,95%可信区间:0.99,9.34;p < 0.05)。在数字广度测试和单词列表回忆得分的变化在两组之间没有显著差异。在数字跨距测试、符号数字模态测试和单词列表回忆测试中,双侧咀嚼对记忆和注意力的改善不逊于单侧咀嚼。结论:在改善健康年轻人的记忆力方面,使用口腔内装置的双侧咀嚼练习并不亚于使用口香糖的单侧咀嚼练习。双侧咀嚼训练对认知功能的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute toxicity study of 77 herbal formulas according to GLP guidelines in rats A Study on the Relationship Between Daeseunggi-tang and Sepsis Survey and Suggestions on the Educational and Research Environment of Graduate Students of Korean Medicine: Focusing on fostering of KMD-scientist Analysis of the current status of quantitative literature evidence for the prescription of 56 herbal medicines covered by health insurance A case report of Korean medicine treatment including Giungoroen-therapy for adhesive capsulitis with insomnia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1