Development and validation of Islamic quality of life questionnaire

Atefeh Nezhadmohammad Nameghi, Masumeh Esmaeili, A. Borjali, Fariborz Bagheri, A. Shafiabadi
{"title":"Development and validation of Islamic quality of life questionnaire","authors":"Atefeh Nezhadmohammad Nameghi, Masumeh Esmaeili, A. Borjali, Fariborz Bagheri, A. Shafiabadi","doi":"10.29252/JRH.9.2.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of life is mainly measured by multiple conceptual frameworks which neglect the cultural-religious context of the societies. Hence, there is not a unique instrument to assess life quality. The present study strives to develop and validate a quality of life questionnaire in light of Javadi Amoli’s view. In this study, the researcher-made questionnaire has been answered by 400 bachelor students. Javadi Amoli’s books have been consulted for developing the questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire has been confirmed by content validity, face validity and, construct validity (using factor analysis and measuring correlation of identified components with total questionnaire). After ensuring content validity and consulting Bartlett's test and Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin index, factor analysis has been performed using principal component analysis and varimax rotation. The results oriented toward four dimensions as God, others, self, and nature which explained 36.5% of the variance. The reliability of the questionnaire has been measured using split-half method and Cronbach's alpha, and reported as 0.63 and 0.89, respectively. The reliability of the extracted dimensions has been 0.87, 0.88, 0.80, and 0.81, respectively. Accordingly, findings of the present research acknowledges the questionnaire to be purposeful and efficient.","PeriodicalId":14122,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JRH.9.2.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of life is mainly measured by multiple conceptual frameworks which neglect the cultural-religious context of the societies. Hence, there is not a unique instrument to assess life quality. The present study strives to develop and validate a quality of life questionnaire in light of Javadi Amoli’s view. In this study, the researcher-made questionnaire has been answered by 400 bachelor students. Javadi Amoli’s books have been consulted for developing the questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire has been confirmed by content validity, face validity and, construct validity (using factor analysis and measuring correlation of identified components with total questionnaire). After ensuring content validity and consulting Bartlett's test and Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin index, factor analysis has been performed using principal component analysis and varimax rotation. The results oriented toward four dimensions as God, others, self, and nature which explained 36.5% of the variance. The reliability of the questionnaire has been measured using split-half method and Cronbach's alpha, and reported as 0.63 and 0.89, respectively. The reliability of the extracted dimensions has been 0.87, 0.88, 0.80, and 0.81, respectively. Accordingly, findings of the present research acknowledges the questionnaire to be purposeful and efficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰教生活质量问卷的编制与验证
生活质量主要通过多种概念框架来衡量,而这些概念框架忽视了社会的文化-宗教背景。因此,没有一种独特的工具来评估生活质量。本研究力求根据Javadi Amoli的观点,开发并验证一份生活质量问卷。在本研究中,研究者制作了问卷,对400名本科生进行了问卷调查。调查问卷的编制参考了Javadi Amoli的书。问卷的效度通过内容效度、面效度和结构效度(采用因子分析和测量识别成分与总问卷的相关性)来证实。在确保内容效度并参考Bartlett检验和Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin指数后,采用主成分分析和变量旋转进行因子分析。结果指向四个维度,即上帝、他人、自我和自然,这解释了36.5%的差异。问卷的信度采用分半法和Cronbach’s alpha进行测量,分别为0.63和0.89。提取维度的信度分别为0.87、0.88、0.80和0.81。因此,本研究的结果承认问卷是有目的和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Depression and Quality of Life in Spouse Caregivers of Inpatients With Substance Use Disorders Difference Effectiveness of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Therapy and Endorphin Massage Therapy Towards Reducing Menstrual Pain Intensity in Adolescents Perspective on Career Transition of Students With Visual Impairments The Frequency of Pro-fluoride Verses Anti-fluoride Posts on Instagram Prevalence of refractive error in paediatric age group in a tertiary eye center in Onitsha, south east, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1