{"title":"The Death Throes of Sacrificed Chicken","authors":"Marie Daugey","doi":"10.3167/ARRS.2018.090109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Kabye society, the commonest sacrificial rites include a device that may\nprompt celebrants to question their own ritual practice. As in other West African societies,\nthe acceptance or refusal of an offering by a divinity is read in the death throes\nof the first chicken to be sacrificed. If the fowl does not die in the expected position,\nthe ceremony is interrupted. Celebrants scrutinize the execution of the rite to identify\nthe mistake that led to the sacrifice’s refusal, and they submit their hypothesis to the\ndivinity. However, the resumption of the rite is not conditioned by the correction of\nthe mistake. It is often sufficient that officiants recognize and reassert the rule that they\nshould have followed. The case of a bull sacrifice demonstrates how the celebrants’ self-critical\npractice may promote a ritual effectiveness in connection with the dialogical\nand pragmatic nature of the rite.","PeriodicalId":42823,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARRS.2018.090109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Kabye society, the commonest sacrificial rites include a device that may
prompt celebrants to question their own ritual practice. As in other West African societies,
the acceptance or refusal of an offering by a divinity is read in the death throes
of the first chicken to be sacrificed. If the fowl does not die in the expected position,
the ceremony is interrupted. Celebrants scrutinize the execution of the rite to identify
the mistake that led to the sacrifice’s refusal, and they submit their hypothesis to the
divinity. However, the resumption of the rite is not conditioned by the correction of
the mistake. It is often sufficient that officiants recognize and reassert the rule that they
should have followed. The case of a bull sacrifice demonstrates how the celebrants’ self-critical
practice may promote a ritual effectiveness in connection with the dialogical
and pragmatic nature of the rite.