Initial experience with stapled haemorrhoidectomy: A local report

K. K. Yau, C. Chung, E. Chan, Michael Li
{"title":"Initial experience with stapled haemorrhoidectomy: A local report","authors":"K. K. Yau, C. Chung, E. Chan, Michael Li","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \n \nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is a new modality in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease and rectal mucosal prolapse. This paper aims at reporting the initial experience in a local institution. \n \n \n \nMethod: \n \nFrom July 2000 to March 2001, a total of 17 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy, including 16 patients with third-degree haemorrhoids and one patient with rectal mucosal prolapse. With the aid of a specially designed assessment form, data were collected during the inpatient period and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation. \n \n \n \nResults: \n \nThe median operation time was 18 min (range 5–45 min) with a median blood loss of 10 mL (range 0–100 mL). Only three patients required pethidine injection during the postoperative period; other patients could be managed with simple oral analgesic. Thirteen patients (76%) could be discharged on the second day after the operation (range 1–7 patients), and the median time off work was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Complications encountered were minor, and symptom control and functional outcome appeared superior to excisional haemorrhoidectomy. \n \n \n \nConclusion: \n \nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is safe. The improved postoperative pain and the reduced time off work are evident; however, long-term outcomes still need further evaluation. \n \n \n \nChinese Abstract \n \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"18 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a new modality in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease and rectal mucosal prolapse. This paper aims at reporting the initial experience in a local institution. Method: From July 2000 to March 2001, a total of 17 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy, including 16 patients with third-degree haemorrhoids and one patient with rectal mucosal prolapse. With the aid of a specially designed assessment form, data were collected during the inpatient period and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation. Results: The median operation time was 18 min (range 5–45 min) with a median blood loss of 10 mL (range 0–100 mL). Only three patients required pethidine injection during the postoperative period; other patients could be managed with simple oral analgesic. Thirteen patients (76%) could be discharged on the second day after the operation (range 1–7 patients), and the median time off work was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Complications encountered were minor, and symptom control and functional outcome appeared superior to excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Conclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is safe. The improved postoperative pain and the reduced time off work are evident; however, long-term outcomes still need further evaluation. Chinese Abstract Figure Chinese Abstract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缝合痔切除术的初步经验:一份本地报告
目的:痔钉切除术是治疗痔病和直肠粘膜脱垂的一种新术式。本文的目的是报告在一个地方机构的初步经验。方法:2000年7月至2001年3月,共收治17例痔切除术患者,其中三度痔16例,直肠粘膜脱垂1例。在特别设计的评估表格的帮助下,收集住院期间和术后4周、8周和12周的数据。结果:中位手术时间为18 min(范围5-45 min),中位失血量为10 mL(范围0-100 mL)。术后仅3例患者需要注射哌替啶;其他患者可简单口服镇痛。术后第2天出院13例(76%)(范围1 ~ 7例),中位休假时间9天(范围1 ~ 21天)。遇到的并发症很少,症状控制和功能结果优于切除痔疮切除术。结论:痔钉切除术是安全的。术后疼痛明显减轻,休假时间明显减少;然而,长期效果仍需进一步评估。中文摘要图中文摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The causes of synthetic vascular graft failure Skin substitutes: An overview Creation of a subcutaneous tunnel in antesternal oesophageal replacement with the aid of a rigid sigmoidoscope Evaluation of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model Retained intra-aortic balloon pump catheter causing acute ischaemic limb: Report of two cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1