The Effect of Falsely Highlighted Intestinal Intraluminal Areas and the Fat in Paraspinal Muscles on Abdominal Adipose Tissue Measurements Using Computed Tomography

IF 0.2 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.25179/tjem.2020-74562
M. Baris, A. Peker, A. Yener, N. Gezer, M. Seçil
{"title":"The Effect of Falsely Highlighted Intestinal Intraluminal Areas and the Fat in Paraspinal Muscles on Abdominal Adipose Tissue Measurements Using Computed Tomography","authors":"M. Baris, A. Peker, A. Yener, N. Gezer, M. Seçil","doi":"10.25179/tjem.2020-74562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The measurement of abdominal fat using computed tomography (CT) is a reliable method for evaluating metabolic disorders. However, some limitations exist with the current CT measurement methods. One of them is falsely highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and the other one is fat in paraspinal muscles. We aimed to investigate the effects of highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and fat in paraspinal muscles on the measured values of abdominal fat. Material and Methods: Measurements were performed on 246 abdominal CT scans of 129 patients using dedicated quantitative CT software. Visceral and subcutaneous fats were measured at the level of L1-L2 disc space using two different methods. Method 1 included the highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and fat in paraspinal muscles for measurements, whereas method 2 excluded them. The values measured using two methods were compared for a statistically significant difference. In addition, the correlation between anthropometric data and subcutaneous adipose tissue measurement methods was analyzed. Results: The mean age of patients was 53 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.73 kg/m2. The waist circumference data were available of 91 patients, and the mean waist circumference was 94 cm. The Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test showed a statistically significant difference between methods 1 and 2 (p<0.0001). Although the measurements performed using methods 1 and 2 were strongly correlated (r>0.9), the Passing-Bablok regression analysis indicated a systematic and proportional error between measurements. Conclusion: Falsely highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas should be excluded for accurate visceral adipose tissue measurements, and the fat in paraspinal muscles affects subcutaneous fat measurement results.","PeriodicalId":42868,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"24 1","pages":"214-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25179/tjem.2020-74562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The measurement of abdominal fat using computed tomography (CT) is a reliable method for evaluating metabolic disorders. However, some limitations exist with the current CT measurement methods. One of them is falsely highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and the other one is fat in paraspinal muscles. We aimed to investigate the effects of highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and fat in paraspinal muscles on the measured values of abdominal fat. Material and Methods: Measurements were performed on 246 abdominal CT scans of 129 patients using dedicated quantitative CT software. Visceral and subcutaneous fats were measured at the level of L1-L2 disc space using two different methods. Method 1 included the highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas and fat in paraspinal muscles for measurements, whereas method 2 excluded them. The values measured using two methods were compared for a statistically significant difference. In addition, the correlation between anthropometric data and subcutaneous adipose tissue measurement methods was analyzed. Results: The mean age of patients was 53 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.73 kg/m2. The waist circumference data were available of 91 patients, and the mean waist circumference was 94 cm. The Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test showed a statistically significant difference between methods 1 and 2 (p<0.0001). Although the measurements performed using methods 1 and 2 were strongly correlated (r>0.9), the Passing-Bablok regression analysis indicated a systematic and proportional error between measurements. Conclusion: Falsely highlighted intestinal intraluminal areas should be excluded for accurate visceral adipose tissue measurements, and the fat in paraspinal muscles affects subcutaneous fat measurement results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错误显示肠道腔内区域和棘旁肌肉脂肪对计算机断层扫描腹部脂肪组织测量的影响
目的:利用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量腹部脂肪是一种评估代谢紊乱的可靠方法。然而,目前的CT测量方法存在一些局限性。其中一个是错误地突出肠腔内区域,另一个是棘旁肌肉的脂肪。我们的目的是研究突出的肠腔内区域和棘旁肌肉脂肪对腹部脂肪测量值的影响。材料与方法:使用专用的定量CT软件对129例患者的246张腹部CT扫描进行测量。采用两种不同的方法在L1-L2椎间盘间隙水平测量内脏和皮下脂肪。方法1将突出的肠腔内区域和棘旁肌脂肪进行测量,方法2将其排除。比较两种方法的测量值是否有统计学上的显著差异。此外,还分析了人体测量数据与皮下脂肪组织测量方法之间的相关性。结果:患者平均年龄53岁,平均体重指数29.73 kg/m2。91例患者的腰围资料,平均腰围为94 cm。Wilcoxon符号秩和检验显示方法1和方法2的差异有统计学意义(p0.9), Passing-Bablok回归分析显示测量结果之间存在系统和比例误差。结论:为了准确测量内脏脂肪组织,应排除错误突出的肠道腔内区域,棘旁肌肉的脂肪影响皮下脂肪测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hyperostosis Frontalis Interna Novel Mutation in T-Cell Immune Regulator 1: A Case of Adult-Onset Autosomal Recessive Osteopetrosis The Evaluation of the Relationship of Klotho and Telomerase in Obese Patients Successful Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Patient with Insulin Allergy and Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report Overexpression of miR-29b in Plasma of Javanese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Semarang, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1