Analysis of Patients with LifeVest after Cardiac Surgery

V. Hajiyev, T. Erkenov, A. Smechowski, S. Just, O. Grimmig, D. Fritzsche
{"title":"Analysis of Patients with LifeVest after Cardiac Surgery","authors":"V. Hajiyev, T. Erkenov, A. Smechowski, S. Just, O. Grimmig, D. Fritzsche","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% are \nat a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and benefit from implantable \ncardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. ICD implantation is not indicated \nduring the first 40 days after acute myocardial infarction and Methods: This is a retrospective \nstudy conducted in the Heart Center in Cottbus. From 02.2015 through 02.2018 26 \nWCD patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed-up. Patient demographics, \ndefibrillation treatments, and daily wear times were retrospectively obtained \nfrom our clinical database and LifeVest network. The patients were questioned \nabout actual NYHA grade and implanted ICD at the end of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five \npatients (mean age 65, 22 men, 3 women) were treated with a WCD in response to \nheart failure (mean EF = 24%) after cardiac surgery (21 CABG, 1 AVR, 1 AVR + \nCABG, 1 AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG). Average daily use of a WCD was 22.1 (SD ± 2.7) hours \nwhich were worn for 85 days (SD ± 35). At that time 11.96 (SD ± 15) events were \ndetected but not treated, 1 defibrillation performed and no asystole seen. At \nthe end of follow-up (12 months, SD ± 9) 20 patients were questioned. All of \nthe patients were alive and 5 (25%) of them were with implanted ICD. 10 (50%) \npatients were in NYHA grade I, 3 (12%) in NYHA grade II, 3 (12%) \nbetween grade II-III, 2 (8%) in grade III and 2 (8%) patients in NYHA grade IV. Conclusions: A WCD is an effective therapy for prevention of sudden \ncardiac death during the recovery period of heart function after cardiac \nsurgery. This is treatment with high patient compliance.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% are at a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. ICD implantation is not indicated during the first 40 days after acute myocardial infarction and Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in the Heart Center in Cottbus. From 02.2015 through 02.2018 26 WCD patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed-up. Patient demographics, defibrillation treatments, and daily wear times were retrospectively obtained from our clinical database and LifeVest network. The patients were questioned about actual NYHA grade and implanted ICD at the end of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five patients (mean age 65, 22 men, 3 women) were treated with a WCD in response to heart failure (mean EF = 24%) after cardiac surgery (21 CABG, 1 AVR, 1 AVR + CABG, 1 AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG). Average daily use of a WCD was 22.1 (SD ± 2.7) hours which were worn for 85 days (SD ± 35). At that time 11.96 (SD ± 15) events were detected but not treated, 1 defibrillation performed and no asystole seen. At the end of follow-up (12 months, SD ± 9) 20 patients were questioned. All of the patients were alive and 5 (25%) of them were with implanted ICD. 10 (50%) patients were in NYHA grade I, 3 (12%) in NYHA grade II, 3 (12%) between grade II-III, 2 (8%) in grade III and 2 (8%) patients in NYHA grade IV. Conclusions: A WCD is an effective therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death during the recovery period of heart function after cardiac surgery. This is treatment with high patient compliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后患者生命周期分析
背景:左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者是心源性猝死(SCD)的高危人群,可从植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗中获益。急性心肌梗死后的头40天内不需要植入ICD。方法:这是一项在Cottbus心脏中心进行的回顾性研究。对2015年2月至2018年2月26例WCD患者进行回顾性分析和随访。从我们的临床数据库和LifeVest网络中回顾性获得患者人口统计资料、除颤治疗和每日佩戴次数。随访结束时询问患者实际NYHA分级和植入ICD。结果:25例患者(平均年龄65岁,22例男性,3例女性)在心脏手术(21例CABG, 1例AVR, 1例AVR + CABG, 1例AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG)后因心力衰竭(平均EF = 24%)而接受WCD治疗。WCD平均每天使用22.1 (SD±2.7)小时,使用85天(SD±35)。当时检测到11.96 (SD±15)例事件,但未进行治疗,1例进行除颤,未见心脏骤停。随访结束时(12个月,SD±9)对20例患者进行问询。所有患者均存活,其中5例(25%)植入ICD。NYHA I级10例(50%),NYHA II级3例(12%),II-III级3例(12%),III级2例(8%),IV级2例(8%)。结论:A WCD是预防心脏手术后心功能恢复期心源性猝死的有效治疗方法。这种治疗具有很高的患者依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Mode of Revelation of a Left Atrium Myxoma Cardiac Manifestations with Chemotherapeutic Agents: 5 Fluorouracil-Induced Coronary Artery Vasospasm Microbiological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal Cardiovascular Function during First 24 Hours after Off-Pump and On-Pump CABG—A Prospective Observational Comparative Study Is Anticoagulation Warranted after Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Patients at Risk for Stroke after Cardiac Surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1