A survey of speech pathologist practice patterns for consulting registered dieticians when recommending diet alterations

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Speech Language and Hearing Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI:10.1080/2050571X.2021.1940789
Ed M. Bice, Kristine E. Galek, A. Vose
{"title":"A survey of speech pathologist practice patterns for consulting registered dieticians when recommending diet alterations","authors":"Ed M. Bice, Kristine E. Galek, A. Vose","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1940789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Diet modification in dysphagia management can significantly impact patient nutrition and hydration status. Since speech-language pathologists (SLPs) do not receive formal training in nutrition, consulting Registered Dieticians (RDs) to assist in diet recommendations is important for patient wellness. The study aimed to better understand current SLP practice patterns for consulting RDs and investigate how work setting, years of experience, education, and patient diagnosis may influence decisions. Methods: A six-item survey was provided to practicing SLPs via a web-based format. Descriptive statistics were used to describe trends in the frequency of RD consultation. Logistic regression was used to identify demographics or educational factors that showed statistically significant higher odds for consulting an RD. Results: 359 SLPs completed the entire survey. Thirty-nine percent of all SLPs and 40% of acute care SLPs indicated they have never or rarely (< 10% of the time) consult an RD prior to making a diet recommendation. Work setting and years of experience did not significantly impact the frequency of RD consults. However, those who had previously taken a course on the impact of diet modifications were 2.4 times more likely to consult an RD (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Since the majority (82%) of participants reported working in an inpatient setting and regulations require, at a minimum, access to an RD in a consultative capacity, the low percentage of consultations indicates an underutilization of a valuable resource. Increased educational opportunities that emphasize the impact of modiying diets may increase RD consultations and team-based decision-making to positively impact overall patient health.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1940789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Diet modification in dysphagia management can significantly impact patient nutrition and hydration status. Since speech-language pathologists (SLPs) do not receive formal training in nutrition, consulting Registered Dieticians (RDs) to assist in diet recommendations is important for patient wellness. The study aimed to better understand current SLP practice patterns for consulting RDs and investigate how work setting, years of experience, education, and patient diagnosis may influence decisions. Methods: A six-item survey was provided to practicing SLPs via a web-based format. Descriptive statistics were used to describe trends in the frequency of RD consultation. Logistic regression was used to identify demographics or educational factors that showed statistically significant higher odds for consulting an RD. Results: 359 SLPs completed the entire survey. Thirty-nine percent of all SLPs and 40% of acute care SLPs indicated they have never or rarely (< 10% of the time) consult an RD prior to making a diet recommendation. Work setting and years of experience did not significantly impact the frequency of RD consults. However, those who had previously taken a course on the impact of diet modifications were 2.4 times more likely to consult an RD (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Since the majority (82%) of participants reported working in an inpatient setting and regulations require, at a minimum, access to an RD in a consultative capacity, the low percentage of consultations indicates an underutilization of a valuable resource. Increased educational opportunities that emphasize the impact of modiying diets may increase RD consultations and team-based decision-making to positively impact overall patient health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言病理学家在建议改变饮食时咨询注册营养师的实践模式调查
摘要:饮食改变在吞咽困难治疗中可以显著影响患者的营养和水合状态。由于语言病理学家(slp)没有接受过正式的营养培训,因此咨询注册营养师(rd)以协助提供饮食建议对患者的健康非常重要。该研究旨在更好地了解当前咨询rd的SLP实践模式,并调查工作环境、多年经验、教育程度和患者诊断如何影响决策。方法:采用基于网络的调查方式,对实习slp进行六项调查。描述性统计用于描述RD咨询频率的趋势。使用逻辑回归来确定人口统计学或教育因素,这些因素在统计上显示咨询RD的可能性更高。结果:359名slp完成了整个调查。39%的slp和40%的急症护理slp表示,他们从未或很少(< 10%的时间)在提出饮食建议之前咨询RD。工作环境和经验年数对研发咨询的频率没有显著影响。然而,那些之前参加过饮食改变影响课程的人咨询RD的可能性是后者的2.4倍(p < 0.001)。结论:由于大多数(82%)参与者报告在住院环境中工作,并且法规要求至少以咨询身份获得RD,因此咨询百分比低表明宝贵资源的利用不足。增加教育机会,强调改变饮食的影响,可能会增加RD咨询和基于团队的决策,从而对患者整体健康产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Speech Language and Hearing
Speech Language and Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Responsiveness to Māori in dysphagia research: beyond ‘kai’ (nutrition), ‘inu’ (hydration), and ‘te reo’ (Māori translation) A systematic review and meta-analysis of dichotic deficits in individuals with learning disability Examination of depth of written reflective practice for speech-language therapy students; the impact of time and clinical competency Perceptions and predictors of health-related quality of life among aging adults who stutter: a first glimpse Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives on bilingual service delivery in India: a preliminary survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1