The Effects of Glycopyrrolate as Premedication on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Seunghyuk Lee, S. Yoon, G. Choi, Yong‐Hee Park, Hyun Kang, C. Baek, Y. Jung, Y. Woo
{"title":"The Effects of Glycopyrrolate as Premedication on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis","authors":"Seunghyuk Lee, S. Yoon, G. Choi, Yong‐Hee Park, Hyun Kang, C. Baek, Y. Jung, Y. Woo","doi":"10.2174/2589645801913010093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glycopyrrolate is often used as a premedication for anesthesia as it has anti-sialogogue and vagolytic effect. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery have high-risk of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).This retrospective study investigates the effect of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for PONV in patients receiving fentanyl-based Intravenous (IV) Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) after laparoscopic gynecological surgery.We reviewed the medical records of adult patients who received fentanyl-based IV-PCA after laparoscopic gynecological surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. We classified patients into two groups on the basis of glycopyrrolate premedication: non-premedicated group (Group N; n = 316) and glycopyrrolate premedicated group (Group P; n = 434). The Propensity Score Matching Method (PSM) was used to select 157 subjects in Group N and P, on the basis of their covariates which were matched with a counterpart in the other group.Prior to PSM, the necessities for rescue anti-emetics were lower on Postoperative Day (POD) 0 (58[18.4%]vs.45[10.4%],P= 0.002) and POD1 (60[19.0%]vs.59[13.6%],P= 0.046), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain on POD 1 (2.86 ± 1.49vs.3.13 ± 1.53,P= 0.017) was higher in group P. After PSM, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score for nausea (0.38 ± 0.75vs. 0.21 ± 0.62,P= 0.027) and rescue anti-emetics (27 [17.2%]vs. 15 [9.6%],P= 0.047) on POD 0 were both lower in the group P.In patients receiving fentanyl-based IV-PCA after laparoscopic gynecological surgery, the severity of nausea and necessity for rescue ant-emetic was lower in the glycopyrrolate premedication group.","PeriodicalId":22862,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645801913010093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glycopyrrolate is often used as a premedication for anesthesia as it has anti-sialogogue and vagolytic effect. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery have high-risk of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).This retrospective study investigates the effect of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for PONV in patients receiving fentanyl-based Intravenous (IV) Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) after laparoscopic gynecological surgery.We reviewed the medical records of adult patients who received fentanyl-based IV-PCA after laparoscopic gynecological surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. We classified patients into two groups on the basis of glycopyrrolate premedication: non-premedicated group (Group N; n = 316) and glycopyrrolate premedicated group (Group P; n = 434). The Propensity Score Matching Method (PSM) was used to select 157 subjects in Group N and P, on the basis of their covariates which were matched with a counterpart in the other group.Prior to PSM, the necessities for rescue anti-emetics were lower on Postoperative Day (POD) 0 (58[18.4%]vs.45[10.4%],P= 0.002) and POD1 (60[19.0%]vs.59[13.6%],P= 0.046), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain on POD 1 (2.86 ± 1.49vs.3.13 ± 1.53,P= 0.017) was higher in group P. After PSM, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score for nausea (0.38 ± 0.75vs. 0.21 ± 0.62,P= 0.027) and rescue anti-emetics (27 [17.2%]vs. 15 [9.6%],P= 0.047) on POD 0 were both lower in the group P.In patients receiving fentanyl-based IV-PCA after laparoscopic gynecological surgery, the severity of nausea and necessity for rescue ant-emetic was lower in the glycopyrrolate premedication group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘罗酸盐作为术前用药对术后恶心和呕吐的影响:倾向评分匹配分析
甘罗酸酯具有抗唾液和迷走神经的作用,常被用作麻醉前用药。腹腔镜妇科手术患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率高。本回顾性研究探讨了甘罗酸盐作为腹腔镜妇科手术后接受芬太尼静脉(IV)患者自控镇痛(PCA)的PONV前用药的效果。我们回顾了2010年1月1日至2016年6月30日在中央大学医院腹腔镜妇科手术后接受芬太尼IV-PCA的成年患者的医疗记录。我们根据甘罗酸预用药情况将患者分为两组:未预用药组(N组;n = 316)和甘罗酸预用药组(P组;N = 434)。采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM),根据N组和P组157名受试者的协变量与另一组的对应变量进行匹配。PSM治疗前,P组患者术后第0天(POD) (58[18.4%]vs.45[10.4%],P= 0.002)和第1天(POD) (60[19.0%]vs.59[13.6%],P= 0.046)使用急救止吐药的必要性较低,第1天(POD)疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)(2.86±1.49vs.3.13±1.53,P= 0.017)高于P组。PSM治疗后,恶心数值评定量表(NRS)评分(0.38±0.75vs.)高于P组。(0.21±0.62,P= 0.027)和抢救止吐药(27例[17.2%]vs。15 [9.6%],P= 0.047)的POD 0均低于P组。在腹腔镜妇科手术后接受芬太尼类IV-PCA的患者中,甘罗罗酸预用药组恶心程度和急救止吐药必要性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Adverse Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Intrathecal Morphine with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Post-total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparison of Changes in the Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Post-surgery Outcomes in Child Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Breath-holding Test in the Prognosis of Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Gynecology: Observational Cohort Study Repeated Thoracic Paravertebral Blocking to Alleviate Pain Symptoms in 66-years-old Man with Post-herpetic Neuralgia: A Case Report Effect of Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine on Release of Inflammatory Mediators in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. A Randomized Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1