Inside running: Internal complaints management practice and regulation in the legal profession

C. Parker, L. Haller
{"title":"Inside running: Internal complaints management practice and regulation in the legal profession","authors":"C. Parker, L. Haller","doi":"10.26180/5DB7FE1FF3435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines what makes for good complaints management in legal practice, how law firms are faring at complaints management, and the role of a regulator in encouraging implementation of effective complaints management. The first part of the paper argues that it can be important from the point of view of clients, legal practices and regulators for legal practices to implement internal complaints management practices. The second part of the paper considers the potential possibilities and problems when regulators attempt to mandate internal complaints management by legal practices. We examine a recent initiative by the Queensland regulator to ask lawyers to complete a survey on complaints management systems. We argue that this approach - of promoting awareness of, discussion about, and commitment to good complaints management inside legal practices, but without mandating any particular system - is a promising model that other jurisdictions should consider closely. The third part of the paper examines what good complaints management involves in principle, and the perceptions, attitudes and practices of legal and non-legal staff in relation to complaints management, using the results from the Queensland survey.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"137 1","pages":"217-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FE1FF3435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper examines what makes for good complaints management in legal practice, how law firms are faring at complaints management, and the role of a regulator in encouraging implementation of effective complaints management. The first part of the paper argues that it can be important from the point of view of clients, legal practices and regulators for legal practices to implement internal complaints management practices. The second part of the paper considers the potential possibilities and problems when regulators attempt to mandate internal complaints management by legal practices. We examine a recent initiative by the Queensland regulator to ask lawyers to complete a survey on complaints management systems. We argue that this approach - of promoting awareness of, discussion about, and commitment to good complaints management inside legal practices, but without mandating any particular system - is a promising model that other jurisdictions should consider closely. The third part of the paper examines what good complaints management involves in principle, and the perceptions, attitudes and practices of legal and non-legal staff in relation to complaints management, using the results from the Queensland survey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部运行:法律行业内部投诉管理实践与规范
本文探讨了在法律实践中是什么促成了良好的投诉管理,律师事务所如何进行投诉管理,以及监管机构在鼓励实施有效投诉管理方面的作用。本文的第一部分认为,从客户、法律实践和监管机构的角度来看,法律实践实施内部投诉管理实践是很重要的。论文的第二部分考虑了潜在的可能性和问题,当监管机构试图通过法律实践强制内部投诉管理。我们研究了昆士兰州监管机构最近的一项倡议,要求律师完成一项关于投诉管理系统的调查。我们认为,这种方法——在法律实践中促进对良好投诉管理的认识、讨论和承诺,但不强制规定任何特定的制度——是一种有前途的模式,值得其他司法管辖区密切考虑。论文的第三部分考察了良好的投诉管理涉及的原则,以及法律和非法律人员在投诉管理方面的看法,态度和做法,使用昆士兰州调查的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1