Gender disparities in remote teaching readiness and mental health problems among university faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Educational and Developmental Psychologist Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI:10.1080/20590776.2022.2108697
G. Saw, Chi-Ning Chang, Shengjie Lin
{"title":"Gender disparities in remote teaching readiness and mental health problems among university faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"G. Saw, Chi-Ning Chang, Shengjie Lin","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2022.2108697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives The main purpose of this study was to examine (1) gender differences in remote teaching readiness and mental health problems among university faculty, and (2) to what extent remote teaching readiness is associated with mental health problems among university faculty, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Survey participants of the study comprised 779 university faculty (58.2% men, 39.4% women, and 2.4% other gender identities or did not report) from 122 higher education institutions in the United States. Results Chi-square tests and independent t-test findings showed that female faculty reported significantly greater remote teaching challenges – in terms of both technology and course design – and higher levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Structural equation modelling results indicated that remote teaching readiness was associated with mental health problems among faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions The findings suggest that gender differences in remote teaching readiness can partially explain the gender disparities in mental health problems among faculty, with female faculty being disadvantaged. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Pre-pandemic evidence indicate that that female faculty tended to have lower confidence and less experience using technology in their teaching. (2) Female faculty reported significantly greater anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. (3) Increased teaching load, reduction in research productivity, and instability in work-life balance may explain the mental health issues experienced by university faculty. What this paper adds: (1) Female faculty reported significantly greater remote teaching challenges – in terms of both technology and course design – during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Remote teaching readiness (or challenges) was associated with mental health problems of university faculty. (3) Remote teaching readiness can partially explain the gender differences in mental health problems among faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":"33 1","pages":"131 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2108697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives The main purpose of this study was to examine (1) gender differences in remote teaching readiness and mental health problems among university faculty, and (2) to what extent remote teaching readiness is associated with mental health problems among university faculty, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Survey participants of the study comprised 779 university faculty (58.2% men, 39.4% women, and 2.4% other gender identities or did not report) from 122 higher education institutions in the United States. Results Chi-square tests and independent t-test findings showed that female faculty reported significantly greater remote teaching challenges – in terms of both technology and course design – and higher levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Structural equation modelling results indicated that remote teaching readiness was associated with mental health problems among faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions The findings suggest that gender differences in remote teaching readiness can partially explain the gender disparities in mental health problems among faculty, with female faculty being disadvantaged. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Pre-pandemic evidence indicate that that female faculty tended to have lower confidence and less experience using technology in their teaching. (2) Female faculty reported significantly greater anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. (3) Increased teaching load, reduction in research productivity, and instability in work-life balance may explain the mental health issues experienced by university faculty. What this paper adds: (1) Female faculty reported significantly greater remote teaching challenges – in terms of both technology and course design – during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Remote teaching readiness (or challenges) was associated with mental health problems of university faculty. (3) Remote teaching readiness can partially explain the gender differences in mental health problems among faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间大学教师远程教学准备中的性别差异和心理健康问题
摘要目的本研究的主要目的是检验(1)2019冠状病毒病疫情期间高校教师远程教学准备与心理健康问题的性别差异,以及(2)远程教学准备与高校教师心理健康问题的关联程度。方法本研究的调查对象包括来自美国122所高等教育机构的779名大学教师(58.2%为男性,39.4%为女性,2.4%为其他性别认同或未报告)。卡方检验和独立t检验结果显示,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,女性教师报告的远程教学挑战(在技术和课程设计方面)明显更大,焦虑和抑郁程度更高。结构方程建模结果表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,远程教学准备与教师的心理健康问题有关。结论远程教学准备的性别差异可以部分解释教师心理健康问题的性别差异,其中女性教师处于劣势。关于这一主题的已知情况:(1)大流行前的证据表明,女教师往往信心较低,在教学中使用技术的经验较少。(2)女性教师在新冠肺炎大流行期间的焦虑和抑郁症状明显增加。(3)教学负荷增加、科研效率下降、工作与生活平衡不稳定可能解释大学教师的心理健康问题。本文补充的内容:(1)在COVID-19大流行期间,女性教师报告了更大的远程教学挑战——在技术和课程设计方面。(2)远程教学准备(或挑战)与大学教师心理健康问题相关。(3)远程教学准备可以部分解释新冠肺炎疫情期间教师心理健康问题的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) in Iranian students Applying computer vision techniques to depression symptomatology through eye blink patterns in university students Rest breaks aid directed attention and learning Self-reported homesickness in Australian adolescent males during their first year at boarding school: an exploratory study of symptomatic features, its dimensionality, coping strategies, and the relationship with academic, resilience, emotional and mental wellbeing factors Cognitive flexibility and academic performance of children in care and children from a community sample: the contrasting mediator effect of task persistence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1