Aspects of the Long-Term Preservation of Digitized Catalogue Data: Analysis of the Databases of Integrated Collection Management Systems

Q1 Arts and Humanities Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1515/pdtc-2021-0007
A. Simon, P. Kiszl
{"title":"Aspects of the Long-Term Preservation of Digitized Catalogue Data: Analysis of the Databases of Integrated Collection Management Systems","authors":"A. Simon, P. Kiszl","doi":"10.1515/pdtc-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During this research, the catalogues of more than 200 libraries and museums of Hungary and its neighboring countries were examined. The authors calculated the amount and the size of the metadata and of the full content records in the databases of their collection management systems, as well as the size and the type of the full content data and the size of the databases. By analyzing the results, the goal was to answer the following three questions: (1) Can any significant difference be established between the results according to country, nationality, or type of institution?; (2) How large is a metadata record or a full content record?; (3) Is it possible to establish a methodology for selecting a representative sample of institutions to facilitate further research? For planning the costs of data management, the size of the databases, the number of metadata records, and the variability of metadata and media records shall all be considered. A distinction should be made between the indispensable “primary” data to be preserved for a long time, and the “secondary” data units which are derived from the primary data. It is investigated in this article how to establish the size of primary data in the databases of collection management systems.","PeriodicalId":38353,"journal":{"name":"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture","volume":"32 1","pages":"51 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract During this research, the catalogues of more than 200 libraries and museums of Hungary and its neighboring countries were examined. The authors calculated the amount and the size of the metadata and of the full content records in the databases of their collection management systems, as well as the size and the type of the full content data and the size of the databases. By analyzing the results, the goal was to answer the following three questions: (1) Can any significant difference be established between the results according to country, nationality, or type of institution?; (2) How large is a metadata record or a full content record?; (3) Is it possible to establish a methodology for selecting a representative sample of institutions to facilitate further research? For planning the costs of data management, the size of the databases, the number of metadata records, and the variability of metadata and media records shall all be considered. A distinction should be made between the indispensable “primary” data to be preserved for a long time, and the “secondary” data units which are derived from the primary data. It is investigated in this article how to establish the size of primary data in the databases of collection management systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化目录数据长期保存的几个方面:综合馆藏管理系统数据库分析
摘要本研究对匈牙利及其周边国家200多家图书馆和博物馆的目录进行了分析。作者计算了各自藏书管理系统数据库中元数据和全内容记录的数量和大小,以及全内容数据的大小和类型以及数据库的大小。通过分析结果,目标是回答以下三个问题:(1)根据国家、国籍或机构类型的不同,结果之间是否存在显著差异?(2)元数据记录和完整内容记录有多大?(3)是否有可能建立一套方法,以选择具有代表性的院校样本,以便进行进一步的研究?在规划数据管理成本时,应考虑数据库的大小、元数据记录的数量以及元数据和媒体记录的可变性。应当区分长期保存的不可缺少的“主要”数据和从主要数据派生出来的“次要”数据单元。本文研究了如何在藏书管理系统的数据库中建立原始数据的大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture
Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The “Silent” Removal of Bibliometric Information of Three SSRN Preprints Related to Peer Review, and then their Full Reinstatement Frontmatter Content Analysis of Libraries’ Instagram Posts: Cultural Collection, Activities, and Preservation of Cultural Heritage Covid-19 Pandemic and Digital Public Awareness Platforms: Strategies, Solutions, and Tools of Communication and e-Government Data Management From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1