The Legacy of a Literary Man in Islamic Legal Theory: Surūrī Chalabī’s Criticisms in his Super- Commentary on al-Talwīḥ and His Arguments

İmam Rabbani Çelik
{"title":"The Legacy of a Literary Man in Islamic Legal Theory: Surūrī Chalabī’s Criticisms in his Super- Commentary on al-Talwīḥ and His Arguments","authors":"İmam Rabbani Çelik","doi":"10.12730/13091719.2022.131.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390), a well-known theorist/theologian of the post-classical era of Islamic thought, not only elucidated the statements of Ṣadr al-sharīʿah in his ḥāshiyah (super-commentary), titled al-Talwīḥ, which he wrote on al-Tawḍīḥ, but also introduced several criticisms against his arguments. Al-Taftāzānī’s work, al- Talwīḥ, was received with great interest by Ottoman scholars, who then composed many ḥāshiyahs on it in the fifteenth century. Although the number of ḥāshiyahs significantly diminished, the practice of ḥāshiyah writing on al-Talwīḥ continued in the sixteenth century. Surūrī Chalabī (d. 969/1562) was one of the scholars who penned a ḥāshiyah on al-Talwīḥ during this period. The literary works of Surūrī Chalabī have recently been the subject of numerous academic studies, yet his legacy in Islamic sciences has not received the same interest. This article, aiming to fill this gap in the literature,scrutinizes synchronically and diachronically the place of Surūrī’s Ḥāshiyah on al-Talwīḥ within the tradition of Ottoman ḥāshiyah writing on al-Talwīḥ and eventually demonstrates that Surūrī primarily dealt with the arguments and comments of Ḥasan Chalabī, a previous ḥāshiyah author who commented on al-Talwīḥ and criticized them in his argument-based ḥāshiyah thus endeavors to position himself within the tradition of ḥāshiyah writing of the previous century through Ḥasan Chalabī’s work.","PeriodicalId":40354,"journal":{"name":"Ilahiyat Studies-A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilahiyat Studies-A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2022.131.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390), a well-known theorist/theologian of the post-classical era of Islamic thought, not only elucidated the statements of Ṣadr al-sharīʿah in his ḥāshiyah (super-commentary), titled al-Talwīḥ, which he wrote on al-Tawḍīḥ, but also introduced several criticisms against his arguments. Al-Taftāzānī’s work, al- Talwīḥ, was received with great interest by Ottoman scholars, who then composed many ḥāshiyahs on it in the fifteenth century. Although the number of ḥāshiyahs significantly diminished, the practice of ḥāshiyah writing on al-Talwīḥ continued in the sixteenth century. Surūrī Chalabī (d. 969/1562) was one of the scholars who penned a ḥāshiyah on al-Talwīḥ during this period. The literary works of Surūrī Chalabī have recently been the subject of numerous academic studies, yet his legacy in Islamic sciences has not received the same interest. This article, aiming to fill this gap in the literature,scrutinizes synchronically and diachronically the place of Surūrī’s Ḥāshiyah on al-Talwīḥ within the tradition of Ottoman ḥāshiyah writing on al-Talwīḥ and eventually demonstrates that Surūrī primarily dealt with the arguments and comments of Ḥasan Chalabī, a previous ḥāshiyah author who commented on al-Talwīḥ and criticized them in his argument-based ḥāshiyah thus endeavors to position himself within the tradition of ḥāshiyah writing of the previous century through Ḥasan Chalabī’s work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰法理中一个文人的遗产:Surūrī chalabi在《al- talw ā (al- talw ā)超级评注》中的批评及其论点
Al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390),一位著名的后古典时代伊斯兰思想的理论家/神学家,不仅在他写于al-Tawḍīḥ的题为al- talw的ḥāshiyah(超级评论)中阐明了Ṣadr al- shari - hah的观点,而且还对他的论点提出了一些批评。Al-Taftāzānī的工作,al- talw ā,受到奥斯曼学者的极大兴趣,然后在15世纪撰写了许多ḥāshiyahs。虽然ḥāshiyahs的数量大大减少,但在al- talw ā上书写ḥāshiyah的做法在16世纪继续存在。Surūrī chalabyi(公元969/1562年)是在这一时期撰写了关于al- talw的ḥāshiyah的学者之一。最近,Surūrī chalabi的文学作品成为许多学术研究的主题,但他在伊斯兰科学方面的遗产却没有受到同样的关注。本文旨在填补这一文献空白,从共时和历时的角度审视Surūrī关于al- talw ā的Ḥāshiyah在奥斯曼ḥāshiyah关于al- talw ā的写作传统中的地位,并最终证明Surūrī主要处理Ḥasan chalabi ā的论点和评论。一位先前的ḥāshiyah作者,他评论al- talw ā,并在他的论点为基础的ḥāshiyah中批评他们,因此努力通过Ḥasan chalabi ā的作品将自己定位在上个世纪ḥāshiyah写作的传统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Faith and Reason: A Comparative Analysis of Abū al-Muʿīn al-Nasafī and Thomas Aquinas on Intellect, Assent, and Free Will A Criticism of Transhumanism from the Society 5.0 Perspective in the Context of Social Values Islamic Classical Theism and the Prospect of Strong Artificial Intelligence The New Materialism and Post-Humanist Studies The Interaction of Religion and Robotics and Al-Sāmi̇rī’s Calf (the Golden Calf) as an Early Theomorphic Robot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1