Results of a Multidisciplinary Workshop to Reduce Bias and Improve Health Equity for Patients With Limited English Proficiency [ID: 1375774]

Etoi A. Garrison, Amita K. Bey, E. Jiménez, Andria Li, A. Nettles
{"title":"Results of a Multidisciplinary Workshop to Reduce Bias and Improve Health Equity for Patients With Limited English Proficiency [ID: 1375774]","authors":"Etoi A. Garrison, Amita K. Bey, E. Jiménez, Andria Li, A. Nettles","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000931148.27353.d4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Birthing people with limited English proficiency (LEP) often face systemic limitations to care and are at increased risk for disparate birth outcomes due to barriers in patient–provider communication. Patients with LEP are particularly vulnerable to biases and microaggressions that can limit timely health care delivery and the quality of services received. We developed a multidisciplinary curriculum to educate providers about 1) unconscious bias (UCB), 2) barriers to equitable health care delivery for patients with LEP, and 3) use of trained interpreter services to promote patient–provider communication. METHODS: We developed a 60-minute workshop for physicians/midwives/nurses (n=75). Surveys were used to assess change in knowledge. Results were evaluated by descriptive statistics, t tests for significance, and thematic analysis. Institutional review board approval was obtained. RESULTS: Approximately 75 participants attended the workshop. Thirty-three percent of pre-workshop survey respondents (13/39) had not received cultural competency training within the last 3 years. Approximately 1 in 5 (22%) pre-workshop respondents were unaware of their hospital's interpreter services policy. After a brief didactic presentation, participants identified common microaggressions and barriers to care for patients with LEP. They also developed 15 unique strategies to promote communication via use of trained interpreters when the patient/family initially opt for ad hoc interpretation instead. At workshop completion, 97.1% of participants reported that they will adopt or modify an existing strategy when communicating with LEP patients and families. CONCLUSION: Post-workshop survey results suggest that continuing education can be used to address UCB for patients with LEP and promote use of interpreter services to improve patient–provider communication.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000931148.27353.d4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Birthing people with limited English proficiency (LEP) often face systemic limitations to care and are at increased risk for disparate birth outcomes due to barriers in patient–provider communication. Patients with LEP are particularly vulnerable to biases and microaggressions that can limit timely health care delivery and the quality of services received. We developed a multidisciplinary curriculum to educate providers about 1) unconscious bias (UCB), 2) barriers to equitable health care delivery for patients with LEP, and 3) use of trained interpreter services to promote patient–provider communication. METHODS: We developed a 60-minute workshop for physicians/midwives/nurses (n=75). Surveys were used to assess change in knowledge. Results were evaluated by descriptive statistics, t tests for significance, and thematic analysis. Institutional review board approval was obtained. RESULTS: Approximately 75 participants attended the workshop. Thirty-three percent of pre-workshop survey respondents (13/39) had not received cultural competency training within the last 3 years. Approximately 1 in 5 (22%) pre-workshop respondents were unaware of their hospital's interpreter services policy. After a brief didactic presentation, participants identified common microaggressions and barriers to care for patients with LEP. They also developed 15 unique strategies to promote communication via use of trained interpreters when the patient/family initially opt for ad hoc interpretation instead. At workshop completion, 97.1% of participants reported that they will adopt or modify an existing strategy when communicating with LEP patients and families. CONCLUSION: Post-workshop survey results suggest that continuing education can be used to address UCB for patients with LEP and promote use of interpreter services to improve patient–provider communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多学科研讨会的结果:减少偏倚,提高英语水平有限的患者的健康公平[j]
简介:英语水平有限(LEP)的分娩人员通常面临系统性的护理限制,并且由于患者与提供者沟通的障碍,导致不同分娩结果的风险增加。LEP患者特别容易受到偏见和微侵犯的影响,这可能会限制及时提供保健服务和所接受服务的质量。我们开发了一个多学科课程来教育提供者:1)无意识偏见(UCB), 2)为LEP患者提供公平医疗服务的障碍,以及3)使用训练有素的翻译服务来促进患者与提供者的沟通。方法:我们为医生/助产士/护士制定了一个60分钟的研讨会(n=75)。调查被用来评估知识的变化。结果通过描述性统计、显著性t检验和专题分析进行评估。已获得机构审查委员会的批准。结果:约75名参与者参加了研讨会。33%的工作坊前调查受访者(13/39)在过去3年内没有接受过文化能力培训。大约五分之一(22%)的研讨会前受访者不知道他们医院的口译服务政策。在简短的教学演讲后,参与者确定了常见的微侵犯和护理LEP患者的障碍。他们还制定了15种独特的策略,当患者/家属最初选择临时口译时,通过使用训练有素的口译员来促进沟通。在研讨会结束时,97.1%的参与者报告说,他们在与LEP患者和家属沟通时将采用或修改现有的策略。结论:研讨会后的调查结果表明,继续教育可以解决LEP患者的UCB问题,并促进口译服务的使用,以改善患者与提供者的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1