The Role of End-of-Course Exams and Minimum Competency Exams in Standards-Based Reforms

J. Bishop, F. Mañé, Michael Bishop, Joan Y. Moriarty
{"title":"The Role of End-of-Course Exams and Minimum Competency Exams in Standards-Based Reforms","authors":"J. Bishop, F. Mañé, Michael Bishop, Joan Y. Moriarty","doi":"10.1353/PEP.2001.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excerpt] Educational reformers and most of the American public believe that most teachers ask too little of their pupils. These low expectations, they believe, result in watered down curricula and a tolerance of mediocre teaching and inappropriate student behavior. The result is that the prophecy of low achievement becomes self-fulfilling. Although research has shown that learning gains are substantially larger when students take more demanding courses2, only a minority of students enroll in these courses. There are several reasons for this. Guidance counselors in many schools allow only a select few into the most challenging courses. While most schools give students and parents the authority to overturn counselor recommendations, many families are unaware they have that power or are intimidated by the counselor’s prediction of failure in the tougher class. As one student put it: “African-American parents, they settle for less, not knowing they can get more for their students.”","PeriodicalId":9272,"journal":{"name":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/PEP.2001.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Excerpt] Educational reformers and most of the American public believe that most teachers ask too little of their pupils. These low expectations, they believe, result in watered down curricula and a tolerance of mediocre teaching and inappropriate student behavior. The result is that the prophecy of low achievement becomes self-fulfilling. Although research has shown that learning gains are substantially larger when students take more demanding courses2, only a minority of students enroll in these courses. There are several reasons for this. Guidance counselors in many schools allow only a select few into the most challenging courses. While most schools give students and parents the authority to overturn counselor recommendations, many families are unaware they have that power or are intimidated by the counselor’s prediction of failure in the tougher class. As one student put it: “African-American parents, they settle for less, not knowing they can get more for their students.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程结束考试和最低能力考试在标准改革中的作用
教育改革者和大多数美国公众认为,大多数教师对学生要求太少。他们认为,这种低期望值导致了课程的淡化,以及对平庸教学和学生不当行为的容忍。结果是,低成就的预言变成了自我实现。尽管研究表明,当学生选择要求更高的课程时,他们的学习收益会大得多,但只有少数学生报读这些课程。这有几个原因。许多学校的辅导员只允许少数人进入最具挑战性的课程。虽然大多数学校都赋予学生和家长推翻辅导员建议的权力,但许多家庭并没有意识到他们有这种权力,或者被辅导员对更难班级的失败预测所吓倒。正如一名学生所说:“非裔美国人的父母,他们满足于更少的要求,不知道他们可以从学生那里得到更多。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: What Do We Know about School Size and Class Size? High School Size, Organization, and Content: What Matters for Student Success? International Evidence on Expenditure and Class Size: A Review Policy from the Hip: Class Size Reduction in California Class Size and School Size: Taking the Trade-Offs Seriously
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1