The introduction and operation of standard costing at J&P Coats Ltd., 1925–1961: an institutional interpretation

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Accounting History Review Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/21552851.2019.1660190
S. Mckinstry, Kirsten W. Kininmonth, Kenneth Mathieson
{"title":"The introduction and operation of standard costing at J&P Coats Ltd., 1925–1961: an institutional interpretation","authors":"S. Mckinstry, Kirsten W. Kininmonth, Kenneth Mathieson","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2019.1660190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study provides a history of the introduction and implementation of standard costing at J&P Coats Ltd, the British-based multinational thread manufacturers, between 1925 and 1961. By 1896, the firm had centralised sales and marketing, strategic and treasury management in its head office in Glasgow. The introduction of standard costing was intended to bring financial discipline within each of its home and overseas mills, to add to the central discipline and control which already existed across the company, as well as to facilitate some aspects of central accounting in Glasgow. The study ends in 1961, the year the company merged with Patons and Baldwins, another UK-based textile firm. As a theoretical lens, our history uses institutional theory, as it affects an understanding of the implementation and operation of new management accounting systems. In particular, we explore the concept that the development and use of new accounting systems may well be conditioned by both external and internal ‘institutions’, or ‘ways of doing things’. The Coats study responds to the call for longitudinal analyses of management accounting innovation from an institutional point of view. It shows how institutional factors affected the implementation and use of standard costing within the firm, operating through human actors and changing organisational structures. In addition, the study adds to what is known about the history and chronology of the development of standard costing in the UK, pointing out similarities and differences between what happened at Coats and other adopters. It underscores that what is known about the installation and usage of costing systems would benefit from an understanding of the institutional factors involved.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"369 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2019.1660190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study provides a history of the introduction and implementation of standard costing at J&P Coats Ltd, the British-based multinational thread manufacturers, between 1925 and 1961. By 1896, the firm had centralised sales and marketing, strategic and treasury management in its head office in Glasgow. The introduction of standard costing was intended to bring financial discipline within each of its home and overseas mills, to add to the central discipline and control which already existed across the company, as well as to facilitate some aspects of central accounting in Glasgow. The study ends in 1961, the year the company merged with Patons and Baldwins, another UK-based textile firm. As a theoretical lens, our history uses institutional theory, as it affects an understanding of the implementation and operation of new management accounting systems. In particular, we explore the concept that the development and use of new accounting systems may well be conditioned by both external and internal ‘institutions’, or ‘ways of doing things’. The Coats study responds to the call for longitudinal analyses of management accounting innovation from an institutional point of view. It shows how institutional factors affected the implementation and use of standard costing within the firm, operating through human actors and changing organisational structures. In addition, the study adds to what is known about the history and chronology of the development of standard costing in the UK, pointing out similarities and differences between what happened at Coats and other adopters. It underscores that what is known about the installation and usage of costing systems would benefit from an understanding of the institutional factors involved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准成本核算在J&P Coats有限公司的引入和运作,1925-1961:一个制度的解释
本研究提供了1925年至1961年间英国跨国线制造商J&P Coats Ltd引入和实施标准成本核算的历史。到1896年,该公司在格拉斯哥的总部集中了销售和市场营销、战略和财务管理。引入标准成本计算的目的是在其国内和海外的每个工厂中引入财务纪律,增加已经存在于整个公司的中央纪律和控制,以及促进格拉斯哥中央会计的某些方面。研究截止到1961年,也就是该公司与另一家英国纺织公司Patons and baldwin合并的那一年。作为一个理论镜头,我们的历史使用制度理论,因为它影响了对新管理会计系统的实施和运作的理解。特别是,我们探讨了这样一个概念,即新会计系统的开发和使用很可能受到外部和内部“机构”或“做事方式”的制约。科茨的研究响应了从制度角度对管理会计创新进行纵向分析的呼吁。它展示了制度因素如何影响公司内部标准成本的实施和使用,通过人力行动者和不断变化的组织结构进行操作。此外,这项研究增加了对英国标准成本发展的历史和年表的了解,指出了科茨和其他采用者之间的异同。它强调,对成本计算系统的安装和使用的了解将受益于对所涉体制因素的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Accounting for sustainability in water supply: the case of the ‘Bottini Aqueduct’ in medieval times ‘American Bookkeeping’ in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries which was not American ‘Accounting for the Music’. Institutional logics in the Regio Teatro Carolino of Palermo at the beginning of the nineteenth century Reflections from the Editor’s Desk Measuring profit and performance, a cautionary tale: Birmingham Small Arms c.1911–c.1936
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1