Households’ willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ethiopia: A review

IF 1.1 Q3 FORESTRY Journal of forest science Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.17221/94/2022-jfs
Diriba Abdeta
{"title":"Households’ willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ethiopia: A review","authors":"Diriba Abdeta","doi":"10.17221/94/2022-jfs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental valuation studies in the context of developing countries have become more frequent in recent years. However, literature which reviews and examines the environmental valuation studies is limited. Thus, this paper performed a literature review on forest contingent valuation studies conducted in the Ethiopian context in the past two decades (2000 to May 2022), focusing on two specific objectives: (i) to examine amounts of resources that households are willing to pay (WTP) for forest conservation, and (ii) to identify determinants of households’ WTP. Results indicate the mean lower annual WTP of USD 0.41 (2.63 birr) and 7.04 man-days per household in money and labour time, respectively. Whereas the mean upper annual WTP of USD 53.52 per household in monetary payment and 94.34 man-days per household in labour time contribution are found for the management and conservation of forest in Ethiopia. The finding reveals that there is a limited proportion of the examined studies that included and estimated WTP in a non-monetary payment vehicle, implying a need for future researches on the topic. The result shows that demographic and socio-economic variables, physical assets ownership, institutional and infrastructural services and bid price variables were the main determinants of households’ WTP. This suggests that the forest conservation intervention program involving public participation in the country needs to consider the identified determinants of WTP in design and implementation of the program. Moreover, the finding indicates the presence of mixed results on the effect and direction in which some determinants of WTP are affected. This recommends a pressing need for comprehensive future studies on the research theme.","PeriodicalId":16011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/94/2022-jfs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Environmental valuation studies in the context of developing countries have become more frequent in recent years. However, literature which reviews and examines the environmental valuation studies is limited. Thus, this paper performed a literature review on forest contingent valuation studies conducted in the Ethiopian context in the past two decades (2000 to May 2022), focusing on two specific objectives: (i) to examine amounts of resources that households are willing to pay (WTP) for forest conservation, and (ii) to identify determinants of households’ WTP. Results indicate the mean lower annual WTP of USD 0.41 (2.63 birr) and 7.04 man-days per household in money and labour time, respectively. Whereas the mean upper annual WTP of USD 53.52 per household in monetary payment and 94.34 man-days per household in labour time contribution are found for the management and conservation of forest in Ethiopia. The finding reveals that there is a limited proportion of the examined studies that included and estimated WTP in a non-monetary payment vehicle, implying a need for future researches on the topic. The result shows that demographic and socio-economic variables, physical assets ownership, institutional and infrastructural services and bid price variables were the main determinants of households’ WTP. This suggests that the forest conservation intervention program involving public participation in the country needs to consider the identified determinants of WTP in design and implementation of the program. Moreover, the finding indicates the presence of mixed results on the effect and direction in which some determinants of WTP are affected. This recommends a pressing need for comprehensive future studies on the research theme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚家庭为森林保护付费的意愿:综述
近年来,以发展中国家为背景进行的环境评价研究越来越频繁。然而,回顾和考察环境评价研究的文献是有限的。因此,本文对过去二十年(2000年至2022年5月)在埃塞俄比亚开展的森林或有价值评估研究进行了文献综述,重点关注两个具体目标:(i)检查家庭愿意为森林保护支付的资源数量(WTP),以及(ii)确定家庭WTP的决定因素。结果表明,在货币和劳动时间上,每户年平均WTP分别降低了0.41美元(2.63 birr)和7.04人日。而埃塞俄比亚森林管理和保护的平均最高年度收入为每户货币支付53.52美元和每户劳动时间贡献94.34人日。这一发现表明,在被检查的研究中,包括和估计非货币支付工具中的WTP的比例有限,这意味着需要对该主题进行未来的研究。结果表明,人口和社会经济变量、实物资产所有权、制度和基础设施服务以及投标价格变量是家庭WTP的主要决定因素。这表明,涉及公众参与的国家森林保护干预计划需要在计划的设计和实施中考虑确定的WTP决定因素。此外,这一发现表明,在影响WTP的某些决定因素的作用和方向上存在混合结果。这表明迫切需要对研究主题进行全面的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Original results of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry related to European forest ecosystems and their functions including those in the landscape and wood production chain are published in original scientific papers, short communications and review articles. Papers are published in English
期刊最新文献
Change in forest species composition and its projections into the economy of forest owners Over- and under-bark volume estimation of European larch timber produced by mechanised harvesting in Czechia Overgrazing strongly impedes the natural regeneration of the endemic Boswellia species on Socotra Island Innovations in the methodological approach to quantifying and evaluating the supported effects of forests for recreational and educational ecosystem services Calculation and operational assessment of tyre contact areas in the tractor-and-trailer unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1