Value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional MRI for differentiation complex solid from cystic ovarian masses

Sally Abd El-Naby, H. Mohamed, F. Elsayed
{"title":"Value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional MRI for differentiation complex solid from cystic ovarian masses","authors":"Sally Abd El-Naby, H. Mohamed, F. Elsayed","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_199_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Conventional MRI has an established role in gynecologic imaging. However, increasing clinical demand for improved lesion characterization and disease mapping to optimize patient management has resulted in the incorporation of newer sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), into routine protocols for pelvic MRI. DWI provides functional information on the microenvironment of water in tissues, hence augmenting the morphologic information derived from conventional MRIs. Aim Aim is to define the role of DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterizing complex ovarian masses, with particular concern to differentiating benign versus malignant masses. Patients and methods Eighty patients who had complex ovarian masses between February 2019 and December 2020 underwent pelvic MRI and DWI at b values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 at 1.5-T unit (Philips Ingenia). Analysis of the pathological specimen with lesion morphology, signal characteristics, and correlation with the appearance at DWI followed by ADC value (both solid and cystic parts) measurement was obtained. Results Included masses proved pathologically benign 41 (51.2%) and 39 (48.8%) malignant. ADC solid component of malignant lesions shows no statistically significant difference from that of the benign lesions, while ADC values of cystic component in malignant masses were significantly higher than those in benign masses (P≤0.001). The receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that a cut-off ADC (cystic part) value of 2.3×10−3 mm/s may be the optimal one for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. Conclusion The combination of DWI with ADC-value measurements and conventional MRI is useful for differentiating benign and malignant masses.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_199_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Conventional MRI has an established role in gynecologic imaging. However, increasing clinical demand for improved lesion characterization and disease mapping to optimize patient management has resulted in the incorporation of newer sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), into routine protocols for pelvic MRI. DWI provides functional information on the microenvironment of water in tissues, hence augmenting the morphologic information derived from conventional MRIs. Aim Aim is to define the role of DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterizing complex ovarian masses, with particular concern to differentiating benign versus malignant masses. Patients and methods Eighty patients who had complex ovarian masses between February 2019 and December 2020 underwent pelvic MRI and DWI at b values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 at 1.5-T unit (Philips Ingenia). Analysis of the pathological specimen with lesion morphology, signal characteristics, and correlation with the appearance at DWI followed by ADC value (both solid and cystic parts) measurement was obtained. Results Included masses proved pathologically benign 41 (51.2%) and 39 (48.8%) malignant. ADC solid component of malignant lesions shows no statistically significant difference from that of the benign lesions, while ADC values of cystic component in malignant masses were significantly higher than those in benign masses (P≤0.001). The receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that a cut-off ADC (cystic part) value of 2.3×10−3 mm/s may be the optimal one for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. Conclusion The combination of DWI with ADC-value measurements and conventional MRI is useful for differentiating benign and malignant masses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在常规MRI基础上增加弥散加权成像对卵巢囊性肿块鉴别的价值
背景:常规MRI在妇科影像学中的地位已确立。然而,临床对改善病变特征和疾病定位以优化患者管理的需求日益增加,导致将新的序列,如弥散加权成像(DWI)纳入骨盆MRI的常规方案。DWI提供了组织中水微环境的功能信息,从而增强了传统mri获得的形态学信息。目的:探讨DWI和表观弥散系数(ADC)在卵巢复杂肿块诊断中的作用,尤其关注肿块的良恶性鉴别。患者和方法2019年2月至2020年12月期间,80例患有复杂卵巢肿块的患者接受了盆腔MRI和DWI检查,b值分别为0、500和1000 s/mm2,单位为1.5 t (Philips Ingenia)。分析病理标本的病变形态、信号特征及其与DWI外观的相关性,并测量ADC值(实性和囊性部分)。结果肿瘤病理证实为良性41例(51.2%),恶性39例(48.8%)。恶性肿块实性成分ADC值与良性肿块无统计学差异,而囊性成分ADC值明显高于良性肿块(P≤0.001)。受体算子特征分析表明,截断ADC(囊性部分)值2.3×10−3 mm/s可能是鉴别良恶性肿块的最佳值。结论DWI、adc值与常规MRI相结合对肿块的良恶性鉴别有一定的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1