Playing with fire: military attacks against a civilian nuclear power station

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02646811.2022.2057727
Don C. Smith
{"title":"Playing with fire: military attacks against a civilian nuclear power station","authors":"Don C. Smith","doi":"10.1080/02646811.2022.2057727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is only one word to describe subjecting a civilian nuclear power plant to a military assault: reprehensible. Until now such an attack by one country against a nuclear power plant located in a different country would have seemed ludicrous. Might terrorists target a nuclear plant? Of course, and there has been much written about this possibility. But one country’s military targeting a nuclear facility in another country? That seemed almost beyond the realm of comprehension. World opprobrium against the perpetrator would almost certainly prevent this from happening. Or at least that was the assumption until now. And yet, as the world sadly knows, that is exactly what happened in the opening weeks of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. According to National Public Radio (NPR), an American public broadcaster, ‘A thorough review of a four-hour, 21-minute security camera video of the attack [revealed] that Russian forces repeatedly fired heavy weapons in the direction of the [Zaporizhzhia nuclear power] plant’s massive reactor buildings’. The Zaporizhzhia plant is Europe’s largest nuclear generating facility. It was recently estimated that there are 150 facilities on site that store spent nuclear fuel rods, all of which require protection and active management. The NPR reporting was subsequently reinforced by a statement issued by the World Nuclear Association, an international organisation that represents the global nuclear industry, which said, ‘[W]e condemn in the strongest terms the direct attack [on the power plant] by the Russian armed forces’.","PeriodicalId":51867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2022.2057727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is only one word to describe subjecting a civilian nuclear power plant to a military assault: reprehensible. Until now such an attack by one country against a nuclear power plant located in a different country would have seemed ludicrous. Might terrorists target a nuclear plant? Of course, and there has been much written about this possibility. But one country’s military targeting a nuclear facility in another country? That seemed almost beyond the realm of comprehension. World opprobrium against the perpetrator would almost certainly prevent this from happening. Or at least that was the assumption until now. And yet, as the world sadly knows, that is exactly what happened in the opening weeks of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. According to National Public Radio (NPR), an American public broadcaster, ‘A thorough review of a four-hour, 21-minute security camera video of the attack [revealed] that Russian forces repeatedly fired heavy weapons in the direction of the [Zaporizhzhia nuclear power] plant’s massive reactor buildings’. The Zaporizhzhia plant is Europe’s largest nuclear generating facility. It was recently estimated that there are 150 facilities on site that store spent nuclear fuel rods, all of which require protection and active management. The NPR reporting was subsequently reinforced by a statement issued by the World Nuclear Association, an international organisation that represents the global nuclear industry, which said, ‘[W]e condemn in the strongest terms the direct attack [on the power plant] by the Russian armed forces’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玩火:军方袭击民用核电站
对民用核电站进行军事攻击,只有一个词可以形容:应受谴责。直到现在,一个国家对位于另一个国家的核电站进行这样的攻击似乎是荒谬的。恐怖分子会以核电站为目标吗?当然,关于这种可能性已经有很多文章了。但是一个国家的军队袭击另一个国家的核设施?这似乎几乎超出了理解的范围。全世界对肇事者的谴责几乎肯定会阻止这种情况发生。至少到目前为止,这是一种假设。然而,可悲的是,全世界都知道,这正是俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的头几周发生的事情。据美国公共广播电台国家公共广播电台(NPR)报道,“对一段4小时21分钟的监控录像进行全面审查后发现,俄罗斯军队多次向该核电站的大型反应堆建筑发射重型武器。”该核电站是欧洲最大的核能发电设施。据最近估计,现场有150个储存乏燃料棒的设施,所有这些设施都需要保护和积极管理。随后,代表全球核工业的国际组织世界核协会(World Nuclear Association)发表了一份声明,强化了美国国家公共电台(NPR)的报道。该声明称,“我们最强烈地谴责俄罗斯武装部队(对核电站)的直接攻击。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Showcase panel – risk management for the swift implementation of energy transition projects Investor–state dispute settlement in natural resources, energy and environmental cases* The Right to a Healthy Environment in and Beyond the Anthropocene: A European Perspective IBA Section on Energy, Environment, Natural Resources and Infrastructure Presentation: ‘Net Zero and Natural Resources Law: Sovereignty, Security and Solidarity in the Clean Energy Transition’ (Oxford University Press, 2024) The Regulation of Decommissioning, Abandonment and Reuse Initiatives in the Oil and Gas Industry: From Obligation to Opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1