Wild ways: a scoping review to understand urban-rewilding behaviour in relation to adaptations to private gardens

S. Moxon, J. Webb, Alexandros Semertzi, Mina Samangooei
{"title":"Wild ways: a scoping review to understand urban-rewilding behaviour in relation to adaptations to private gardens","authors":"S. Moxon, J. Webb, Alexandros Semertzi, Mina Samangooei","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2023.2218016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Urbanisation is increasing, while global biodiversity is decreasing. Through ‘urban rewilding’ cities could help tackle this biodiversity crisis, while exploiting the benefits of urban nature for residents. Private residential gardens, which have potential to support significant biodiversity, should be a primary focus. Yet their proportion of vegetated space is decreasing through changes made by residents, negatively impacting biodiversity. Small adaptations to private gardens can turn them into wildlife habitat, but understanding residents’ behaviour is critical to developing intervention strategies for this. This paper presents a scoping review of existing literature on understanding intent-orientated, pro-environmental behaviours with a focus on rewilding in urban gardens. The literature is mapped to assess the state of knowledge; it is then coded, using the ‘COM-B’ model of behaviour, to identify the capability, opportunity and motivation factors forming barriers and facilitators to residents engaging in rewilding activity in their gardens. The results show that all COM-B factors need to be considered to understand urban rewilding behaviour, but that opportunity and motivation factors have more influence, particularly reflective motivation. They indicate that facilitators are more significant than barriers and highlight an important body of work that has implications for practice and policy aimed at influencing urban rewilding.","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":"35 1","pages":"888 - 902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2218016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urbanisation is increasing, while global biodiversity is decreasing. Through ‘urban rewilding’ cities could help tackle this biodiversity crisis, while exploiting the benefits of urban nature for residents. Private residential gardens, which have potential to support significant biodiversity, should be a primary focus. Yet their proportion of vegetated space is decreasing through changes made by residents, negatively impacting biodiversity. Small adaptations to private gardens can turn them into wildlife habitat, but understanding residents’ behaviour is critical to developing intervention strategies for this. This paper presents a scoping review of existing literature on understanding intent-orientated, pro-environmental behaviours with a focus on rewilding in urban gardens. The literature is mapped to assess the state of knowledge; it is then coded, using the ‘COM-B’ model of behaviour, to identify the capability, opportunity and motivation factors forming barriers and facilitators to residents engaging in rewilding activity in their gardens. The results show that all COM-B factors need to be considered to understand urban rewilding behaviour, but that opportunity and motivation factors have more influence, particularly reflective motivation. They indicate that facilitators are more significant than barriers and highlight an important body of work that has implications for practice and policy aimed at influencing urban rewilding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生的方式:一个范围审查,以了解与适应私人花园有关的城市再野生行为
城市化进程在加快,而全球生物多样性却在减少。通过“城市野生化”,城市可以帮助解决这一生物多样性危机,同时为居民利用城市自然的好处。私人住宅花园具有支持重要生物多样性的潜力,应该成为主要关注的焦点。然而,由于居民的改变,它们的植被空间比例正在减少,对生物多样性产生了负面影响。对私人花园的小改造可以把它们变成野生动物的栖息地,但了解居民的行为对于制定干预策略至关重要。本文对现有文献进行了范围审查,以理解以意图为导向的亲环境行为,重点关注城市花园中的野生动物。文献被映射以评估知识状态;然后,使用“COM-B”行为模型对其进行编码,以确定形成障碍和促进居民在其花园进行野化活动的能力、机会和动机因素。结果表明,要理解城市野化行为,需要考虑所有COM-B因素,但机会和动机因素的影响更大,尤其是反思动机。它们表明,促进因素比障碍更重要,并突出了一系列重要的工作,这些工作对旨在影响城市再野生化的实践和政策具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is your city planned for all citizens as they age? Selecting the indicators to measure neighbourhoods’ age-friendliness in the urban planning field Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency Towards climate change resilience and informal workers’ health in Zimbabwe: an action-research case study Examining discrimination in home improvement financing (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act 2012–2016) and neighborhood health in the United States Research for city practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1