Superintendents’ Perceptions Regarding the Supervision and Evaluation of Principals in a Rural State

Q4 Social Sciences The Rural Educator Pub Date : 2019-12-07 DOI:10.35608/ruraled.v40i3.779
David J. Hvidston, Courtney McKim
{"title":"Superintendents’ Perceptions Regarding the Supervision and Evaluation of Principals in a Rural State","authors":"David J. Hvidston, Courtney McKim","doi":"10.35608/ruraled.v40i3.779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goals for this mixed methods study were to examine superintendents’ perceptions regarding their own supervision and evaluation of principals in a rural state. Five research questions guided the mixed methods inquiry. An online survey tool was used to gather perceptions from superintendents regarding their own evaluation and supervision of principals. Participants solicited included all 48 superintendents from a rural Mountain West state. Out of the participants solicited 23 superintendents agreed to participate (48% response rate). Results from this study provided implications for those who train superintendents and those who supervise and evaluate principals. \n  \nKeywords: superintendents, principal supervision, principal evaluation, principals","PeriodicalId":33740,"journal":{"name":"The Rural Educator","volume":"21 1","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rural Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v40i3.779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The goals for this mixed methods study were to examine superintendents’ perceptions regarding their own supervision and evaluation of principals in a rural state. Five research questions guided the mixed methods inquiry. An online survey tool was used to gather perceptions from superintendents regarding their own evaluation and supervision of principals. Participants solicited included all 48 superintendents from a rural Mountain West state. Out of the participants solicited 23 superintendents agreed to participate (48% response rate). Results from this study provided implications for those who train superintendents and those who supervise and evaluate principals.   Keywords: superintendents, principal supervision, principal evaluation, principals
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村州督学对校长监督与评价的看法
这个混合方法研究的目标是检查在一个农村州督学对他们自己的监督和校长评价的看法。五个研究问题指导了混合方法调查。一项在线调查工具被用来收集督学对他们自己对校长的评价和监督的看法。征集的参与者包括来自西部山区农村州的所有48名督学。在征集的参与者中,有23名管理者同意参与(48%的回复率)。本研究结果对培训主管及监督及评鉴校长者有启发意义。关键词:校长;校长监督;校长评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Rural Educator
The Rural Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Equity and Justice in Rural Organizations: Implications for Policy and Practice “Does It Identify Me?”: The Multiple Identities of College Students from Rural Areas Introduction for the special issue: Race and Rurality in Education Moving into Critical Spaces: Making Meaning of One Rural Educator’s Experiences Working with Latinx Immigrant Students Educators’ Perspectives on Factors Impacting STEM Achievement in Rural Indigenous Student-Serving Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1