Combined Effects of Shock Wave Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Active Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius Muscle

Q3 Medicine JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.32598/rj.23.2.3378.1
K. Albomahmood, A. Shadmehr, M. Hadian, S. Jalaie, Jameel Tahseen, S. Fereydounnia
{"title":"Combined Effects of Shock Wave Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Active Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius Muscle","authors":"K. Albomahmood, A. Shadmehr, M. Hadian, S. Jalaie, Jameel Tahseen, S. Fereydounnia","doi":"10.32598/rj.23.2.3378.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We investigated the combined effect of Radial Shockwave Therapy (RSWT) and muscle energy technique (MET) on pain, range of motion (ROM), and neck function in people with active trigger points (ATrPs) of the upper trapezius muscle. Materials & Methods: Fifty-four participants with ATrPs of the upper trapezius muscle were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (n=18) received only MET, group B (n=18) received only RSWT, and group C (n=18) received both RSWT and RSWT. Pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), neck function using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire, and lateral-flexion range of movement (LF ROM) were measured before and after the intervention. The participants were treated for three sessions in one week with at least two days of rest between sessions. Results: All three intervention groups showed pain reduction (p<0.001), an increase in PPT (p<0.001), counter-lateral flexion (CLF) (p<0.001), and also improvement in neck function (p<0.001). The combined group showed a more obvious improvement than the other two groups in PPT (p<0.001). There was no difference between the three groups in terms of VAS and NDI scores and CLF (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that all three interventions used in the upper trapezius trigger points therapy were effective; however, the combined group showed a significant difference in PPT. Therefore, combined therapy is superior to MET and RSWT alone in improving pressure pain relief in individuals with upper trapezius trigger points.","PeriodicalId":46374,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/rj.23.2.3378.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the combined effect of Radial Shockwave Therapy (RSWT) and muscle energy technique (MET) on pain, range of motion (ROM), and neck function in people with active trigger points (ATrPs) of the upper trapezius muscle. Materials & Methods: Fifty-four participants with ATrPs of the upper trapezius muscle were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (n=18) received only MET, group B (n=18) received only RSWT, and group C (n=18) received both RSWT and RSWT. Pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), neck function using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire, and lateral-flexion range of movement (LF ROM) were measured before and after the intervention. The participants were treated for three sessions in one week with at least two days of rest between sessions. Results: All three intervention groups showed pain reduction (p<0.001), an increase in PPT (p<0.001), counter-lateral flexion (CLF) (p<0.001), and also improvement in neck function (p<0.001). The combined group showed a more obvious improvement than the other two groups in PPT (p<0.001). There was no difference between the three groups in terms of VAS and NDI scores and CLF (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that all three interventions used in the upper trapezius trigger points therapy were effective; however, the combined group showed a significant difference in PPT. Therefore, combined therapy is superior to MET and RSWT alone in improving pressure pain relief in individuals with upper trapezius trigger points.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲击波疗法与肌能技术对斜方肌上部活动触发点的联合作用
目的:探讨放射冲击波疗法(RSWT)和肌肉能量技术(MET)对上斜方肌活动触发点(atrp)患者疼痛、活动范围(ROM)和颈部功能的联合影响。材料与方法:54例上斜方肌atrp患者随机分为三组。A组(n=18)只接受MET, B组(n=18)只接受RSWT, C组(n=18)同时接受RSWT和RSWT。干预前后分别采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度、压痛阈值(PPT)、颈部功能量表(NDI)和侧屈活动范围(LF ROM)进行测量。参与者在一周内接受三次治疗,每次治疗之间至少休息两天。结果:3个干预组均有疼痛减轻(p0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,所有三种干预措施用于上斜方肌触发点治疗是有效的;然而,联合组在PPT上有显著差异。因此,联合治疗在改善上斜方肌触发点个体的压力疼痛缓解方面优于MET和RSWT单独治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Urinary Incontinence and Leisure Time activities of Women with Multiple Sclerosis The best time of weight bearing after ACL reconstruction, immediately or delayed? A randomized clinical trial Translation and Psychometric Analysis of The Farsi Version of The Watlx Outpatient Rehabilitation of Service Patients' Experience Questionnaire Effect of Pitch Discrimination-Based Rehabilitation on Diagnostic Indices of Dichotic Digit Test, monaural Selective Auditory Attention Test, and Pitch Pattern Test in Children Suspected of Auditory Processing Disorder with Pitch Discrimination Deficits The Effectiveness of Cogniplus Cognitive Training Program on Social Cognition (Theory of Mind) in 6-8-Year-Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1