Mutation detection with a liquid biopsy 96 mutation assay in cancer patients and healthy donors

Aaron Chen, Glenn Braunstein, M. Anselmo, Jair Jaboni, Fernando T. Viloria, J. Neidich, Xiang Li, A. Kammesheidt
{"title":"Mutation detection with a liquid biopsy 96 mutation assay in cancer patients and healthy donors","authors":"Aaron Chen, Glenn Braunstein, M. Anselmo, Jair Jaboni, Fernando T. Viloria, J. Neidich, Xiang Li, A. Kammesheidt","doi":"10.4103/2395-3977.202228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promise as an adjunct to traditional cancer screening methods. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA measurements, levels were measured in plasma from patients with a cancer diagnosis and a low-risk, healthy population. Methods: We validated a plasma assay for detection of 96 ctDNA mutations in nine cancer genes (BRAF, CTNNB1, EGFR, FOXL2, GNAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53). The assay reliably detects low levels of ctDNA, >2 copies. A total of 183 plasma samples from cancer patients were obtained along with plasma from 102 healthy individuals. Results: ctDNA was detected in 24.0% of cancer patients (14.7% stage I, 18.8% II, 33.3% III, and 50.0% IV). ctDNA was not detected in 96% of low-risk subjects. Three subjects tested positive for one mutation and one subject tested positive for two mutations. ctDNA levels in positive subjects were followed for a year, and levels remained steady with small fluctuation. Multiple lung nodules found in the subject with two mutations have remained stable for 1 year. None of the healthy individuals was diagnosed with cancer in the year following study entry. Conclusion: The sensitivity of the ctDNA assay was 24.0% in the mixture of cancers. The specificity was 96.1%. In the low cancer risk population, the apparent false positive detection rate for ctDNA at 1 year is 3.9%.","PeriodicalId":9428,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Translational Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"39 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-3977.202228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Aim: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promise as an adjunct to traditional cancer screening methods. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA measurements, levels were measured in plasma from patients with a cancer diagnosis and a low-risk, healthy population. Methods: We validated a plasma assay for detection of 96 ctDNA mutations in nine cancer genes (BRAF, CTNNB1, EGFR, FOXL2, GNAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53). The assay reliably detects low levels of ctDNA, >2 copies. A total of 183 plasma samples from cancer patients were obtained along with plasma from 102 healthy individuals. Results: ctDNA was detected in 24.0% of cancer patients (14.7% stage I, 18.8% II, 33.3% III, and 50.0% IV). ctDNA was not detected in 96% of low-risk subjects. Three subjects tested positive for one mutation and one subject tested positive for two mutations. ctDNA levels in positive subjects were followed for a year, and levels remained steady with small fluctuation. Multiple lung nodules found in the subject with two mutations have remained stable for 1 year. None of the healthy individuals was diagnosed with cancer in the year following study entry. Conclusion: The sensitivity of the ctDNA assay was 24.0% in the mixture of cancers. The specificity was 96.1%. In the low cancer risk population, the apparent false positive detection rate for ctDNA at 1 year is 3.9%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在癌症患者和健康供体中进行液体活检96突变检测
目的:循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)检测有望作为传统癌症筛查方法的辅助手段。为了确定ctDNA测量的敏感性和特异性,研究人员测量了癌症诊断患者和低风险健康人群血浆中的ctDNA水平。方法:我们验证了一种检测9种癌症基因(BRAF、CTNNB1、EGFR、FOXL2、GNAS、KRAS、NRAS、PIK3CA和TP53)中96个ctDNA突变的血浆检测方法。该分析可靠地检测低水平的ctDNA, >2拷贝。共获得183份来自癌症患者的血浆样本以及102名健康个体的血浆样本。结果:24.0%的癌症患者检测到ctDNA(ⅰ期14.7%,ⅱ期18.8%,ⅲ期33.3%,ⅳ期50.0%),96%的低危患者未检测到ctDNA。三名受试者的一种突变检测呈阳性,一名受试者的两种突变检测呈阳性。阳性受试者的ctDNA水平随访了一年,水平保持稳定,波动很小。在两个突变的受试者中发现的多发肺结节已保持稳定1年。在研究开始后的一年里,没有一个健康的人被诊断出患有癌症。结论:ctDNA检测对混合肿瘤的敏感性为24.0%。特异性为96.1%。在低癌症风险人群中,1年ctDNA的明显假阳性检出率为3.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyclooxygenase-2 contributes to mutant epidermal growth factor receptor lung tumorigenesis by promoting an immunosuppressive environment Comparison of histopathological grading and staging of breast cancer with p53-positive and transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2-negative immunohistochemical marker expression cases Characteristics and outcome of patients with pheochromocytoma Chemical compositions and antiproliferative effect of essential oil of asafoetida on MCF7 human breast cancer cell line and female wistar rats Protein disulfide isomerase A3: A potential regulatory factor of colon epithelial cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1