Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic-Dose Anticoagulation Therapy with Intermediate-Therapeutic Doses in Covid-19 Patients

D. Kurniawati, A. Subagjo, L. Djuari
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic-Dose Anticoagulation Therapy with Intermediate-Therapeutic Doses in Covid-19 Patients","authors":"D. Kurniawati, A. Subagjo, L. Djuari","doi":"10.37506/ijfmt.v17i1.18902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARSCoV-2) was declared a worldwide pandemic on March 11, 2020 and globally, on April 29, 2022, there were 510,270,667 confirmed COVID-19 cases, including 6,233,526 deaths, reported to WHO. As of April 2022, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia has reported 4,249,323 confirmed cases of COVID-19. There have been 143,592 COVID-19-related deaths reported and 4,096,194 patients have recovered from the disease. COVID-19 is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, to date, optimal prophylactic anticoagulant therapy remains uncertain and may depend on the severity of COVID-19. Objective(s): The aim of this study was to determine the difference in efficacy and safety in administering prophylactic doses with intermediate/therapeutic doses in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Result(s): This study used 6 studies that met the inclusion of differences in efficacy and safety in administering prophylactic doses with intermediate/therapeutic doses in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Conclusion(s): From 6 studies, there were 2 studies comparing anticoagulant prophylactic doses with intermediate doses and 4 studies comparing anticoagualnt prophylactic doses with therapeutic doses. In all studies, there were no significant differences in thromboembolic events or all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. The incidence of bleeding at the intermediate and therapeutic doses increased compared to the prophylactic dose, but the difference was not significant. Copyright © 2023, Institute of Medico-legal Publication. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":39136,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v17i1.18902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARSCoV-2) was declared a worldwide pandemic on March 11, 2020 and globally, on April 29, 2022, there were 510,270,667 confirmed COVID-19 cases, including 6,233,526 deaths, reported to WHO. As of April 2022, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia has reported 4,249,323 confirmed cases of COVID-19. There have been 143,592 COVID-19-related deaths reported and 4,096,194 patients have recovered from the disease. COVID-19 is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, to date, optimal prophylactic anticoagulant therapy remains uncertain and may depend on the severity of COVID-19. Objective(s): The aim of this study was to determine the difference in efficacy and safety in administering prophylactic doses with intermediate/therapeutic doses in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Result(s): This study used 6 studies that met the inclusion of differences in efficacy and safety in administering prophylactic doses with intermediate/therapeutic doses in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Conclusion(s): From 6 studies, there were 2 studies comparing anticoagulant prophylactic doses with intermediate doses and 4 studies comparing anticoagualnt prophylactic doses with therapeutic doses. In all studies, there were no significant differences in thromboembolic events or all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. The incidence of bleeding at the intermediate and therapeutic doses increased compared to the prophylactic dose, but the difference was not significant. Copyright © 2023, Institute of Medico-legal Publication. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防剂量中剂量抗凝治疗在Covid-19患者中的疗效和安全性
2020年3月11日,由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARSCoV-2)引起的冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)被宣布为全球大流行。截至2022年4月29日,世卫组织报告的全球COVID-19确诊病例为510,270,667例,其中包括6,233,526例死亡。截至2022年4月,印度尼西亚共和国政府报告了4249323例COVID-19确诊病例。据报告,与covid -19相关的死亡人数为143592人,康复患者为4096194人。COVID-19与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的高风险相关,然而,迄今为止,最佳预防性抗凝治疗仍不确定,可能取决于COVID-19的严重程度。目的:本研究的目的是确定在确诊的COVID-19患者中给予预防剂量与中间/治疗剂量的疗效和安全性差异。结果:本研究纳入了6项研究,这些研究符合对确诊COVID-19患者给予预防剂量与中间/治疗剂量的疗效和安全性差异的纳入。结论:6项研究中,2项研究比较了抗凝预防剂量与中间剂量,4项研究比较了抗凝预防剂量与治疗剂量。在所有研究中,COVID-19患者的血栓栓塞事件或全因死亡率没有显著差异。与预防剂量相比,中间剂量和治疗剂量的出血发生率增加,但差异不显著。版权所有©2023,医学法律出版研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: “Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology ” is peer reviewed six monthly journal. It deals with Forensic Medicine, Forensic Science, Toxicology, DNA fingerprinting, sexual medicine and environment medicine. It has been assigned International standard serial No. p-0973-9122 and e-0973-9130. The Journal has been assigned RNI No. DELENG/2008/21789.
期刊最新文献
An Autopsy Study of Intentional Deaths among Adolescents in the Age Group of 10 to 19 Years in Bengaluru City Evaluating Skeletal Trauma and Forensic Anthropology for Medicolegal Investigations: A Systematic Review Comparison of the Poisoning Severity Score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score with Lactate to assess the outcome in Acute Organophosphorus Poisoning Analysis of the Lung’s Histopathologic Changes in a Variety of Acute Asphyxia Deaths at S.M.S Hospital In Jaipur Demographic Profile and Outcome of Acute Poisoning and Envenomation among Children in Tertiary Care Hospital: An 8-Year Ambispective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1