Level of satisfaction during mammography screening in relation to discomfort, service provided, level of pain and breast compression

Aud Mette Myklebust , Therese Seierstad , Erling Stranden , Anners Lerdal
{"title":"Level of satisfaction during mammography screening in relation to discomfort, service provided, level of pain and breast compression","authors":"Aud Mette Myklebust ,&nbsp;Therese Seierstad ,&nbsp;Erling Stranden ,&nbsp;Anners Lerdal","doi":"10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors having the largest influence on the patients, experiences of mammography screening and if these factors can be generalised for different centres.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Three-hundred-and-ninety-three women attending mammography examination during two randomly selected days at four screening centres in the Southern Health Region of Norway were approached. A questionnaire designed to survey socio-demographic variables and their experience with mammography screening was distributed upon attendance. The answers to the questionnaire were related to the level of breast compression which was recorded for every patient. Statistical analyses were performed to assess women's satisfaction, discomfort and level of pain during mammography screening.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-two percent (324/393) completed the questionnaire. Ninety-one percent were ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the service at the mammography screening centres. Still, 80% reported high level of discomfort related to the examination. ‘Moderate’, ‘strong’ or ‘intense’ pain during breast compression was reported by 25% of the women. Mean breast compression ranged from 8.5 ± 1.2 kg to15.7 ± 2.2 kg. In all, 23% of women experienced strong and intense pain at a compression of more than 16 kg, while none of the women experienced strong or intense pain for compression less than 8 kg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results concur with earlier studies showing high level of satisfaction among Norwegian women undergoing breast screening. The present study clearly demonstrates that the level of compression is vital to the patients' experience of pain, but do not seem to influence their level of satisfaction with the procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100505,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiography","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.003","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117509000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors having the largest influence on the patients, experiences of mammography screening and if these factors can be generalised for different centres.

Material and methods

Three-hundred-and-ninety-three women attending mammography examination during two randomly selected days at four screening centres in the Southern Health Region of Norway were approached. A questionnaire designed to survey socio-demographic variables and their experience with mammography screening was distributed upon attendance. The answers to the questionnaire were related to the level of breast compression which was recorded for every patient. Statistical analyses were performed to assess women's satisfaction, discomfort and level of pain during mammography screening.

Results

Eighty-two percent (324/393) completed the questionnaire. Ninety-one percent were ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the service at the mammography screening centres. Still, 80% reported high level of discomfort related to the examination. ‘Moderate’, ‘strong’ or ‘intense’ pain during breast compression was reported by 25% of the women. Mean breast compression ranged from 8.5 ± 1.2 kg to15.7 ± 2.2 kg. In all, 23% of women experienced strong and intense pain at a compression of more than 16 kg, while none of the women experienced strong or intense pain for compression less than 8 kg.

Conclusion

Our results concur with earlier studies showing high level of satisfaction among Norwegian women undergoing breast screening. The present study clearly demonstrates that the level of compression is vital to the patients' experience of pain, but do not seem to influence their level of satisfaction with the procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳房x光检查期间的满意度与不适、提供的服务、疼痛程度和乳房压迫有关
目的本研究的目的是确定对患者乳房x光检查经历影响最大的因素,以及这些因素是否可以推广到不同的中心。材料和方法随机选择两天在挪威南部卫生区四个筛查中心参加乳房x光检查的393名妇女。一份旨在调查社会人口学变量及其乳房x光检查经验的问卷在出席时分发。问卷的回答与每位患者的乳房压迫程度有关。统计分析评估女性在乳房x光检查期间的满意度、不适和疼痛程度。结果82%(324/393)的人完成了问卷调查。91%的人对乳房x光检查中心的服务表示“满意”或“非常满意”。尽管如此,80%的人仍然报告了与检查有关的高度不适。25%的女性在乳房挤压过程中有“中度”、“强烈”或“强烈”的疼痛。平均乳房受压范围为8.5±1.2 kg至15.7±2.2 kg。总的来说,23%的女性在超过16公斤的压力下经历了强烈而剧烈的疼痛,而在8公斤以下的压力下,没有女性经历过强烈或剧烈的疼痛。结论:我们的研究结果与早期的研究结果一致,表明挪威妇女接受乳房筛查的满意度很高。目前的研究清楚地表明,压迫程度对患者的疼痛体验至关重要,但似乎并不影响他们对手术的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The radiation therapist’s role in real-time EPI interpretation and decision-making Mammography: Current practice in Australia for the selection of bucky angle in the mediolateral oblique view of the breast Would you like an infection with your injection? A study investigating infection control and administering policies regarding radiographer performed intravenous Injections Radiographers’ attitudes towards persons with dementia Morphological and kinetic characteristics of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) correlated with histopathological factors of breast cancer: A potential prognostic role of breast MRI?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1