Influence of dietary organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit

R. Chowdhury, MA Rahman, M. A. Al Mamun
{"title":"Influence of dietary organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit","authors":"R. Chowdhury, MA Rahman, M. A. Al Mamun","doi":"10.3329/bjas.v51i2.60495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to compare the effects of different feed additives namely, organic acid (citric acid), probiotic (navio plus), and antioxidant (Bio-Sel-E) on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit to convey a clear message on the use of one specific additive in rabbit diet. Thirty-two crossbred New Zealand White growing rabbit (four to five weeks of age) were randomly assigned to four different groups and reared for a period of fifty six days. Rabbit were fed on green grass (Hymenachne pseudointerrupta) and concentrate mixture (2703 Kcal ME/kg, 16.91 % CP). Additives were added at the top of the concentrate mixture, except for the control group. Compared with the control group, rabbit fed different additives showed 9–13% higher growth rate and 7–11% greater growth velocity; and probiotic supplemented group showed the best result (P<0.05) in terms of FCR value. Carcass weight (%) increased significantly in probiotic supplemented group, but numerically in organic acid and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control group. Abdominal fat (%) was significantly decreased in organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control, however, lowest value (%) was recorded in probiotic supplemented group. Probiotic showed significant effect on pH decreasing trend in ingesta sample up to small intestine. Crude protein digestibility co-efficient (%) value was significantly higher in probiotic supplemented group, but numerically in organic acid and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control group. Overall results indicated that, among the three different additives: organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant, probiotic may be considered as the best one for the better performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit. \nBangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 51 (2): 55-61.","PeriodicalId":8873,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v51i2.60495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the effects of different feed additives namely, organic acid (citric acid), probiotic (navio plus), and antioxidant (Bio-Sel-E) on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit to convey a clear message on the use of one specific additive in rabbit diet. Thirty-two crossbred New Zealand White growing rabbit (four to five weeks of age) were randomly assigned to four different groups and reared for a period of fifty six days. Rabbit were fed on green grass (Hymenachne pseudointerrupta) and concentrate mixture (2703 Kcal ME/kg, 16.91 % CP). Additives were added at the top of the concentrate mixture, except for the control group. Compared with the control group, rabbit fed different additives showed 9–13% higher growth rate and 7–11% greater growth velocity; and probiotic supplemented group showed the best result (P<0.05) in terms of FCR value. Carcass weight (%) increased significantly in probiotic supplemented group, but numerically in organic acid and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control group. Abdominal fat (%) was significantly decreased in organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control, however, lowest value (%) was recorded in probiotic supplemented group. Probiotic showed significant effect on pH decreasing trend in ingesta sample up to small intestine. Crude protein digestibility co-efficient (%) value was significantly higher in probiotic supplemented group, but numerically in organic acid and antioxidant supplemented groups compared with control group. Overall results indicated that, among the three different additives: organic acid, probiotic and antioxidant, probiotic may be considered as the best one for the better performance and nutrient digestibility in growing rabbit. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 51 (2): 55-61.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲粮中添加有机酸、益生菌和抗氧化剂对生长兔生长性能和营养物质消化率的影响
本研究通过比较有机酸(柠檬酸)、益生菌(navio plus)和抗氧化剂(Bio-Sel-E)三种不同饲料添加剂对生长兔生长性能和营养物质消化率的影响,为兔饲粮中添加一种特定添加剂提供明确的信息。选用4 ~ 5周龄的杂交新西兰白生长兔32只,随机分为4组,饲养56 d。饲喂绿草(Hymenachne pseudointerrupta)和精料混合物(2703 Kcal ME/kg, 16.91% CP)。除对照组外,在浓缩混合物顶部添加添加剂。与对照组相比,饲喂不同添加剂的家兔生长速度提高9-13%,生长速度提高7-11%;以FCR值计,添加益生菌组效果最好(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,益生菌添加组的胴体重(%)显著增加,有机酸和抗氧化剂添加组的胴体重(%)略有增加。与对照组相比,有机酸、益生菌和抗氧化剂添加组腹部脂肪(%)显著降低,但益生菌添加组腹部脂肪(%)最低。益生菌对摄食样品直至小肠的pH值下降趋势有显著影响。与对照组相比,益生菌添加组的粗蛋白质消化率系数(%)显著高于对照组,有机酸和抗氧化剂添加组的消化率系数(%)显著高于对照组。综上所述,在有机酸、益生菌和抗氧化剂3种不同的添加物中,益生菌的添加效果最好,可以提高生长兔的生产性能和营养物质的消化率。动物学报,51(2):55-61。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of age on follicular dynamics of goat ovaries Neuroanatomy of lumbosacral and pudendal plexus in pigeon of Bangladesh Effect of diluters on frozen semen production of Black Bengal Goat Production performance, breeding practices and challenges of Holstein-Local crossbred cattle in some selected areas of Bangladesh Evaluation of degradability of Moringa, Pineapple waste and Plantain herbs by in situ and in vitro gas production technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1