Pooling Agents for Customer-Intensive Services

Oper. Res. Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.1287/opre.2022.2259
Zhongbin Wang, Luyi Yang, Shiliang Cui, Sezer Ülkü, Yong-Pin Zhou
{"title":"Pooling Agents for Customer-Intensive Services","authors":"Zhongbin Wang, Luyi Yang, Shiliang Cui, Sezer Ülkü, Yong-Pin Zhou","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To Pool or Not to Pool? Analyzing Customer-Intensive Services with Strategic Agents In customer-intensive services where service quality increases with service time, service providers commonly pool their agents and give performance bonuses that reward agents for achieving greater customer satisfaction and serving more customers. Conventional wisdom suggests that pooling agents reduce customer wait time whereas performance bonuses motivate agents to produce high-quality services, both of which should boost customer satisfaction. However, in “Pooling Agents for Customer-Intensive Services,” Wang, Yang, Cui, Ülkü, and Zhou find that when agents act strategically, they may choose to speed up under pooling in an attempt to serve more customers, thus undermining service quality. If this happens, pooling can backfire and result in both lower customer satisfaction and agent payoff. Consequently, the researchers propose a simple practical solution to restore the efficiency of pooling. They propose pooling a portion of the performance bonuses (incentive pooling) in conjunction with pooling agents (operational pooling).","PeriodicalId":19546,"journal":{"name":"Oper. Res.","volume":"34 1","pages":"860-875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oper. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

To Pool or Not to Pool? Analyzing Customer-Intensive Services with Strategic Agents In customer-intensive services where service quality increases with service time, service providers commonly pool their agents and give performance bonuses that reward agents for achieving greater customer satisfaction and serving more customers. Conventional wisdom suggests that pooling agents reduce customer wait time whereas performance bonuses motivate agents to produce high-quality services, both of which should boost customer satisfaction. However, in “Pooling Agents for Customer-Intensive Services,” Wang, Yang, Cui, Ülkü, and Zhou find that when agents act strategically, they may choose to speed up under pooling in an attempt to serve more customers, thus undermining service quality. If this happens, pooling can backfire and result in both lower customer satisfaction and agent payoff. Consequently, the researchers propose a simple practical solution to restore the efficiency of pooling. They propose pooling a portion of the performance bonuses (incentive pooling) in conjunction with pooling agents (operational pooling).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集中代理客户密集型服务
池还是不池?在客户密集型服务中,服务质量随着服务时间的增加而提高,服务提供商通常会将他们的座席集中起来,并给予绩效奖金,奖励座席实现更高的客户满意度和服务更多的客户。传统观点认为,汇集座席可以减少客户等待时间,而绩效奖金可以激励座席提供高质量的服务,这两者都应该提高客户满意度。然而,Wang, Yang, Cui, Ülkü, and Zhou在“客户密集型服务的座席汇集”中发现,座席在采取战略行动时,可能会选择在汇集下加速,以服务更多的客户,从而降低服务质量。如果发生这种情况,汇集可能会适得其反,导致客户满意度和座席报酬都降低。因此,研究人员提出了一个简单实用的解决方案来恢复池化的效率。他们建议将部分绩效奖金(激励池)与池化代理(运营池化)结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A web-based multi-criteria decision support system for benchmarking marketing decisions alternatives Integrated optimization of wagon flow routing and train formation plan Two-machine decentralized flow shop scheduling problem with inter-factory batch delivery system A simplified swarm optimization algorithm to minimize makespan on non-identical parallel machines with unequal job release times under non-renewable resource constraints Meta-frontier: literature review and toolkit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1