Supply chains (Scope 3) toward sustainable food systems: An analysis of food & beverage processing corporate greenhouse gas emissions disclosure

Daniela J. Schulman , Alexis H. Bateman , Suzanne Greene
{"title":"Supply chains (Scope 3) toward sustainable food systems: An analysis of food & beverage processing corporate greenhouse gas emissions disclosure","authors":"Daniela J. Schulman ,&nbsp;Alexis H. Bateman ,&nbsp;Suzanne Greene","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2021.100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To align business activities with the Paris Agreement goal to limit global warming to 1.5°, companies may disclose and set targets to mitigate their emissions. The global food system contributes up to 37% of total annual emissions. Major food &amp; beverage processing companies heavily contribute to food system emissions through their supply chains. Despite this, sector-specific analysis of the status and quality of scope 3 emissions for food &amp; beverage processing companies is lacking. Using 2018 CDP data to build a sample of 153 companies, the authors describe the state of voluntary disclosure, particularly for scope 3, for food &amp; beverage processing companies. Further, the paper investigated the effect of emissions performance, national environmental policy, international negotiation group, and primary activity on scope 3 disclosure. It also examined the effect of primary activity, scope 3 disclosure, and national environmental policy and international negotiation group on direct- and energy-related emissions performance. The authors found scope 3 disclosure in the food &amp; beverage processing sector was incomplete and inconsistent. The 2018 Environmental Performance Index score and the international negotiating group of a company's headquarter country were significant predictors of scope 3 disclosure by category. Firm size (by revenue) was the only significant predictor of direct and energy-related (scopes 1 and 2) emissions, but was not correlated with improved emissions performance. The authors concluded with a set of recommendations to improve the availability and transparency of scope 3 emissions data, and invited further research into sector-specific scope 3 disclosure, performance, effect of firm size and climate policy at the national and international levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791621000026/pdfft?md5=f71bfeead4ecb15985772f1056550312&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791621000026-main.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791621000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

To align business activities with the Paris Agreement goal to limit global warming to 1.5°, companies may disclose and set targets to mitigate their emissions. The global food system contributes up to 37% of total annual emissions. Major food & beverage processing companies heavily contribute to food system emissions through their supply chains. Despite this, sector-specific analysis of the status and quality of scope 3 emissions for food & beverage processing companies is lacking. Using 2018 CDP data to build a sample of 153 companies, the authors describe the state of voluntary disclosure, particularly for scope 3, for food & beverage processing companies. Further, the paper investigated the effect of emissions performance, national environmental policy, international negotiation group, and primary activity on scope 3 disclosure. It also examined the effect of primary activity, scope 3 disclosure, and national environmental policy and international negotiation group on direct- and energy-related emissions performance. The authors found scope 3 disclosure in the food & beverage processing sector was incomplete and inconsistent. The 2018 Environmental Performance Index score and the international negotiating group of a company's headquarter country were significant predictors of scope 3 disclosure by category. Firm size (by revenue) was the only significant predictor of direct and energy-related (scopes 1 and 2) emissions, but was not correlated with improved emissions performance. The authors concluded with a set of recommendations to improve the availability and transparency of scope 3 emissions data, and invited further research into sector-specific scope 3 disclosure, performance, effect of firm size and climate policy at the national and international levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向可持续食品系统的供应链(范围3):食品和饮料加工企业温室气体排放披露分析
为了使商业活动与《巴黎协定》将全球变暖限制在1.5°c的目标保持一致,企业可以披露并设定减排目标。全球粮食系统占年总排放量的37%。主要食品&;饮料加工公司通过其供应链对食品系统的排放做出了重大贡献。尽管如此,针对食品第3类排放现状和质量的行业分析;缺少饮料加工公司。作者使用2018年的CDP数据建立了153家公司的样本,描述了自愿披露的状况,特别是第三类,食品和;饮料加工公司。此外,本文还研究了排放绩效、国家环境政策、国际谈判小组和主要活动对范围3披露的影响。它还审查了主要活动、范围3披露、国家环境政策和国际谈判小组对直接和与能源有关的排放绩效的影响。作者在食品&饮料加工部门不完整,不一致。2018年环境绩效指数得分和公司总部所在国的国际谈判小组是按类别分类的范围3披露的重要预测指标。企业规模(按收入计算)是直接和能源相关(范围1和2)排放的唯一重要预测因素,但与改善的排放绩效无关。作者最后提出了一系列建议,以提高第3类排放数据的可用性和透明度,并邀请进一步研究特定行业的第3类披露、绩效、企业规模的影响以及国家和国际层面的气候政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical model of green entrepreneurship and digital transformation in enhancing the sustainability of batik MSMEs with business innovation as a mediating variable Sustainability-driven intellectual capital model in carbon disclosure: Insights from PLS-SEM Systematic literature review of the factors of information sharing that enable circular procurement in the construction industry Legitimacy of life cycle assessment for sustainable communities Understanding what makes sustainability education effective: Insights from a university certificate program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1