From not-for-profit to profit-driven independent schools through the eyes of some of the stakeholders

Q3 Social Sciences Perspectives in Education Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i4.14
Ilze Breedt, J. Beckmann, André du Plessis
{"title":"From not-for-profit to profit-driven independent schools through the eyes of some of the stakeholders","authors":"Ilze Breedt, J. Beckmann, André du Plessis","doi":"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i4.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study sought to explore the experiences of stake­ holders at independent schools during and after the transition from a not-profit governance approach to a for-profit governance approach after a change of ownership. Section 29(3) of the Constitution of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to establish and maintain, at their own expense, independent educational institutions” subject to certain requirements to ensure quality education (RSA, 1996a). Such schools have become an integral part of the South African education system. However, some independent schools represent the notions of investment and profitable business and companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) have started to invest in the independent school sector. The requirements of good governance, as stipulated in the King III Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2009, were used as the conceptual framework for this study. Two independent schools that transitioned from a not-for-profit approach to a profit-driven governance approach were sampled. It was found that the experiences of the principals and management teams of the participating schools differed significantly from the experiences of the teachers and parents at these schools. A school is part of a community and when a company takes over a school, they need to make sure the communication to all stakeholders is clear and transparent. had parents to manage, who had their own expectations and did not get what they expected with the increase of the school fees. Those were expectations that I had to explain. Because of the change in culture, we lost a lot of kids, and they were the children of the parents who helped build the school. I experienced two years of exceedingly difficult times and I did not experience the governors’ support.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i4.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study sought to explore the experiences of stake­ holders at independent schools during and after the transition from a not-profit governance approach to a for-profit governance approach after a change of ownership. Section 29(3) of the Constitution of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to establish and maintain, at their own expense, independent educational institutions” subject to certain requirements to ensure quality education (RSA, 1996a). Such schools have become an integral part of the South African education system. However, some independent schools represent the notions of investment and profitable business and companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) have started to invest in the independent school sector. The requirements of good governance, as stipulated in the King III Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2009, were used as the conceptual framework for this study. Two independent schools that transitioned from a not-for-profit approach to a profit-driven governance approach were sampled. It was found that the experiences of the principals and management teams of the participating schools differed significantly from the experiences of the teachers and parents at these schools. A school is part of a community and when a company takes over a school, they need to make sure the communication to all stakeholders is clear and transparent. had parents to manage, who had their own expectations and did not get what they expected with the increase of the school fees. Those were expectations that I had to explain. Because of the change in culture, we lost a lot of kids, and they were the children of the parents who helped build the school. I experienced two years of exceedingly difficult times and I did not experience the governors’ support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从非营利性到营利性私立学校通过一些利益相关者的眼睛
本定性研究旨在探讨在所有权变更后,私立学校从非营利性管理方式向营利性管理方式过渡期间和之后,利益相关者的经验。《南非宪法》第29(3)条规定,“每个人都有权自费建立和维持独立的教育机构”,但须符合确保优质教育的某些要求(RSA, 1996a)。这些学校已成为南非教育制度的一个组成部分。然而,一些私立学校代表了投资和盈利业务的概念,在约翰内斯堡证券交易所(JSE)上市的公司已开始投资私立学校领域。本研究使用King III报告2009南非公司治理中规定的善治要求作为本研究的概念框架。我们选取了两所私立学校作为样本,这两所学校从非营利模式过渡到以利润为导向的管理模式。调查发现,参与学校的校长和管理团队的经验与这些学校的教师和家长的经验有显著差异。学校是社区的一部分,当一家公司接管一所学校时,他们需要确保与所有利益相关者的沟通是清晰透明的。有家长要管理,他们有自己的期望,并没有得到他们所期望的随着学费的增加。这些都是我必须解释的期望。由于文化的变化,我们失去了很多孩子,他们是帮助建立学校的父母的孩子。我经历了两年极其困难的时期,我没有得到州长们的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Grade R teachers’ perceptions concerning parental participation in early literacy development in a disadvantaged context in the Western Cape An exploration of African-student agency: Placing students from historically disadvantaged communities at the centre A systematic review of the implications for teaching, learning and assessment at South African universities after the Covid-19 pandemic Self-Assessment Inclusion Scale (SAIS): a tool for measuring inclusive competence and sensitivity Investigating nomophobia as a possible mental health disorder in Gauteng public schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1