Evaluating the human response to sensory irritation: implications for setting occupational exposure limits.

P. Dalton
{"title":"Evaluating the human response to sensory irritation: implications for setting occupational exposure limits.","authors":"P. Dalton","doi":"10.1080/15298660108984681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although animal models of sensory irritation have led to the development of useful assays for evaluating the potency of chemical irritants, the importance of conducting human exposure studies to model and understand the human response to sensory irritants cannot be minimized. In recent years a series of tests have been developed for humans that can be safely conducted and that can provide excellent data on which to base occupational exposure limits. This article delineates the major issues involved in the evaluations of sensory irritation in humans. Among these issues are the differences between odor and irritation, irritation and slight toxicity, adaptation and habituation, as well as personal expectation about discomfort and the reported irritation. The article also describes psychophysiological and electrophysiological methods for assessing sensory irritation. Some of the possible confounders that can influence the results of human tests involving sensory irritants are addressed.","PeriodicalId":7449,"journal":{"name":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Although animal models of sensory irritation have led to the development of useful assays for evaluating the potency of chemical irritants, the importance of conducting human exposure studies to model and understand the human response to sensory irritants cannot be minimized. In recent years a series of tests have been developed for humans that can be safely conducted and that can provide excellent data on which to base occupational exposure limits. This article delineates the major issues involved in the evaluations of sensory irritation in humans. Among these issues are the differences between odor and irritation, irritation and slight toxicity, adaptation and habituation, as well as personal expectation about discomfort and the reported irritation. The article also describes psychophysiological and electrophysiological methods for assessing sensory irritation. Some of the possible confounders that can influence the results of human tests involving sensory irritants are addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估人类对感官刺激的反应:设定职业暴露限值的意义。
虽然感觉刺激的动物模型已经导致了评估化学刺激物效力的有用测定方法的发展,但进行人体暴露研究以模拟和了解人体对感觉刺激物的反应的重要性不能被低估。近年来,为人类开发了一系列可安全进行的试验,这些试验可提供极好的数据,作为制定职业接触限值的依据。这篇文章描述了评估人类感官刺激的主要问题。这些问题包括气味和刺激之间的差异,刺激和轻微毒性,适应和习惯化,以及个人对不适和报告刺激的期望。本文还介绍了评估感觉刺激的心理生理学和电生理学方法。讨论了可能影响涉及感官刺激物的人体试验结果的一些可能的混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches and considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants: report of recent symposia. Approach to setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants in The Netherlands. The origin of a nicotine detection method. Telephone communications with several commercial respirators. Replotting data for chronic beryllium disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1