Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiation between Malignant and Non-malignant Differentiation between Malignant and Non-malignant Maxillofacial Lesions Maxillofacial Lesions

R. Ashraf, Mostafa S. Ashmawy, Mena E. Y. Ekladious, Gihan Omar, mona aboelfetouh
{"title":"Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiation between Malignant and Non-malignant Differentiation between Malignant and Non-malignant Maxillofacial Lesions Maxillofacial Lesions","authors":"R. Ashraf, Mostafa S. Ashmawy, Mena E. Y. Ekladious, Gihan Omar, mona aboelfetouh","doi":"10.54623/fdj.7015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: to evaluate the signal characteristics of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWMRI) of maxillofacial intraosseous lesions and their corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and assess their ability to differentiate between malignant and non-malignant lesions. Methods: This study included 17 patients (10 males and 7 females) selected from the outpatients’ clinic of Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain-shams University. They were examined by MRI machine; Philips 1.5 Tesla Achieva, Netherlands using DWMRI, T1 and T2 sequences and ADC values were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between T1 signal distributions among patients with benign and malignant lesions (P-value = 0.027, Effect size = 0.685) benign lesions showed higher prevalence of low signal while malignant lesions showed higher prevalence of intermediate signal. There was a statistically significant difference between T2 signal distributions among patients with benign and malignant lesions (P-value = 0.029, Effect size = 0.609). Benign lesions showed higher prevalence of high signal while malignant lesions showed higher prevalence of intermediate signal. ROC curve analysis showed a cut-off value of (≤ 1 ´10-3 mm2) with diagnostic accuracy of 94.1%, a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91.7% indicating that ADC values less than or equal to 1 ´10-3 mm2 indicate malignant lesion and values greater than 1 ´10-3 mm2 indicate benign lesion (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 3.25). Conclusion: DWMRI is highly accurate in the differentiation between benign and malignant intraosseous lesions of the ja","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"198 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: to evaluate the signal characteristics of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWMRI) of maxillofacial intraosseous lesions and their corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and assess their ability to differentiate between malignant and non-malignant lesions. Methods: This study included 17 patients (10 males and 7 females) selected from the outpatients’ clinic of Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain-shams University. They were examined by MRI machine; Philips 1.5 Tesla Achieva, Netherlands using DWMRI, T1 and T2 sequences and ADC values were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between T1 signal distributions among patients with benign and malignant lesions (P-value = 0.027, Effect size = 0.685) benign lesions showed higher prevalence of low signal while malignant lesions showed higher prevalence of intermediate signal. There was a statistically significant difference between T2 signal distributions among patients with benign and malignant lesions (P-value = 0.029, Effect size = 0.609). Benign lesions showed higher prevalence of high signal while malignant lesions showed higher prevalence of intermediate signal. ROC curve analysis showed a cut-off value of (≤ 1 ´10-3 mm2) with diagnostic accuracy of 94.1%, a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91.7% indicating that ADC values less than or equal to 1 ´10-3 mm2 indicate malignant lesion and values greater than 1 ´10-3 mm2 indicate benign lesion (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 3.25). Conclusion: DWMRI is highly accurate in the differentiation between benign and malignant intraosseous lesions of the ja
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥散加权磁共振成像在颌面部恶性与非恶性鉴别中的准确性弥散加权磁共振成像在颌面部恶性病变鉴别中的准确性
目的:评价颌面部骨内病变的弥散加权磁共振成像(DWMRI)信号特征及其相应的表观弥散系数(ADC)值,评估其鉴别恶性和非恶性病变的能力。方法:选取艾因沙姆斯大学牙科学院口腔外科门诊患者17例,男10例,女7例。用核磁共振成像仪检查;Philips 1.5 Tesla Achieva,荷兰,采用DWMRI,测量T1和T2序列及ADC值。结果:良恶性病变患者T1信号分布差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.027,效应值= 0.685),良性病变低信号发生率较高,恶性病变中间信号发生率较高。良恶性病变患者T2信号分布差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.029,效应值= 0.609)。良性病变以高信号为主,恶性病变以中间信号为主。ROC曲线分析显示,截断值(≤1´10-3 mm2)诊断准确率为94.1%,灵敏度为100%,特异性为91.7%,表明ADC值小于等于1´10-3 mm2为恶性病变,大于1´10-3 mm2为良性病变(p值<0.001,效应值= 3.25)。结论:DWMRI对骨内病变的良恶性鉴别具有较高的准确性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging Software in predicting upper jaw soft tissue profile changes in Class II Adult Patients treated with Extraction versus Non-Extraction Success of Early Childhood Caries After Treatment with Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared to conventional Glass Ionomer Restoration. A Systematic Review Comparison of Alignment Duration Between 0.018” And 0.022” Slot Brackets in Non-Extraction Orthodontic Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study The Efficiency of Passive Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation on the Retrievability of Guttaflow Bioseal : In Vitro Study Radiographic Analysis of Umbrella Technique Combined with Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1