“Let’s Talk about Gender” – Development of a Card Deck on (Gender) Sensitivity in HCI Research and Practice Based on a Contrasting Literature Review

Q1 Social Sciences i-com Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1515/icom-2021-0001
Sabrina Burtscher, Katta Spiel
{"title":"“Let’s Talk about Gender” – Development of a Card Deck on (Gender) Sensitivity in HCI Research and Practice Based on a Contrasting Literature Review","authors":"Sabrina Burtscher, Katta Spiel","doi":"10.1515/icom-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Funding bodies in Western societies increasingly require researchers to address gender in their proposals – though often exclusively framed around binary notions. With oppressive power structures being prevalent and persuasive, these seep into current practices of Computer Science and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. However, current curricula rarely provide actors in this space with grounded guidance on gender issues tied to their inquiries. Hence, developing an increased awareness of our societal responsibility towards equity can be challenging without an appropriate starting point. Drawing on a close reading of select literature discussing gender sensitivity in HCI research, we derived practical guidance in the form of recommendations for the design, proposal, conduct and presentation of research. Based on these recommendations, we then present the design of a card deck and initial tests thereof at ditact women’s IT summer university. Our analysis offers a starting point for HCI students and interested researchers to explore questions and issues around gender and to identify how gender relates to their research. This sensitisation may aid them in further reflecting on how they might better account for gendered implications of their work.","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"11 1","pages":"85 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Funding bodies in Western societies increasingly require researchers to address gender in their proposals – though often exclusively framed around binary notions. With oppressive power structures being prevalent and persuasive, these seep into current practices of Computer Science and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. However, current curricula rarely provide actors in this space with grounded guidance on gender issues tied to their inquiries. Hence, developing an increased awareness of our societal responsibility towards equity can be challenging without an appropriate starting point. Drawing on a close reading of select literature discussing gender sensitivity in HCI research, we derived practical guidance in the form of recommendations for the design, proposal, conduct and presentation of research. Based on these recommendations, we then present the design of a card deck and initial tests thereof at ditact women’s IT summer university. Our analysis offers a starting point for HCI students and interested researchers to explore questions and issues around gender and to identify how gender relates to their research. This sensitisation may aid them in further reflecting on how they might better account for gendered implications of their work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“让我们谈谈性别”——基于文献对比分析的HCI研究与实践中(性别)敏感性的牌组构建
西方社会的资助机构越来越多地要求研究人员在他们的提案中解决性别问题——尽管往往完全围绕二元概念。随着压迫性权力结构的盛行和说服,这些渗透到当前计算机科学和人机交互(HCI)研究的实践中。然而,目前的课程很少为这一领域的行动者提供与他们的调查有关的关于性别问题的有根据的指导。因此,如果没有适当的起点,提高我们对公平的社会责任的认识可能是具有挑战性的。通过仔细阅读讨论HCI研究中性别敏感性的精选文献,我们以研究设计、提议、实施和展示的建议形式获得了实用指导。在这些建议的基础上,我们提出了一个卡组的设计和初步测试,其在独立女子IT夏季大学。我们的分析为HCI学生和感兴趣的研究人员提供了一个起点,可以探索有关性别的问题和问题,并确定性别与他们的研究之间的关系。这种敏感性可能有助于他们进一步思考如何更好地解释其工作的性别影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Social anthropology 4.0 The future of interactive information radiators for knowledge workers The future of HCI – editorial Towards new realities: implications of personalized online layers in our daily lives Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1