Research on construction method of learning paths and learning progressions based on cognitive diagnosis assessment

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.1080/0969594X.2021.1978387
Xiaopeng Wu, Rongxiu Wu, Yi Zhang, D. Arthur, Hua-Hua Chang
{"title":"Research on construction method of learning paths and learning progressions based on cognitive diagnosis assessment","authors":"Xiaopeng Wu, Rongxiu Wu, Yi Zhang, D. Arthur, Hua-Hua Chang","doi":"10.1080/0969594X.2021.1978387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Learning path and learning progression have received extensive attention from broad disciplines. The existing research In the field of learning path is rarely applied in curriculum learning and teaching. Learning progression is usually constructed through observations, interviews but not quantitative analyses. With 726 Grade 8 students’ mathematical knowledge in TIMSS-2015 as the research object, this research adopted a newly generated assessment theory – cognitive diagnosis assessment as the research tool and exploited methods such as K-means clustering analysis to construct learning path by combing the relationships among the attributes. We obtained the students’ ability θs for each classified group through the 3PL model in the Item Response Theory (IRT) and constructed the learning progressions based on the θs and the attribute relationships. From a data-driven approach, this method has provided a new perspective as well as the data support for the construction of the learning paths and the learning progressions.","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1978387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Learning path and learning progression have received extensive attention from broad disciplines. The existing research In the field of learning path is rarely applied in curriculum learning and teaching. Learning progression is usually constructed through observations, interviews but not quantitative analyses. With 726 Grade 8 students’ mathematical knowledge in TIMSS-2015 as the research object, this research adopted a newly generated assessment theory – cognitive diagnosis assessment as the research tool and exploited methods such as K-means clustering analysis to construct learning path by combing the relationships among the attributes. We obtained the students’ ability θs for each classified group through the 3PL model in the Item Response Theory (IRT) and constructed the learning progressions based on the θs and the attribute relationships. From a data-driven approach, this method has provided a new perspective as well as the data support for the construction of the learning paths and the learning progressions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于认知诊断评估的学习路径与学习进度构建方法研究
学习路径和学习进阶已经受到众多学科的广泛关注。现有的学习路径研究很少应用于课程的学习与教学。学习进程通常是通过观察、访谈而不是定量分析来构建的。本研究以TIMSS-2015中726名八年级学生的数学知识为研究对象,采用新产生的评估理论——认知诊断评估作为研究工具,利用k均值聚类分析等方法,通过梳理属性之间的关系,构建学习路径。我们通过项目反应理论(IRT)中的3PL模型得到了每个分类组学生的能力θs,并基于θs和属性关系构建了学习进阶。该方法从数据驱动的角度出发,为学习路径和学习级数的构建提供了新的视角和数据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Recent decades have witnessed significant developments in the field of educational assessment. New approaches to the assessment of student achievement have been complemented by the increasing prominence of educational assessment as a policy issue. In particular, there has been a growth of interest in modes of assessment that promote, as well as measure, standards and quality. These have profound implications for individual learners, institutions and the educational system itself. Assessment in Education provides a focus for scholarly output in the field of assessment. The journal is explicitly international in focus and encourages contributions from a wide range of assessment systems and cultures. The journal''s intention is to explore both commonalities and differences in policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
EduSEL-R – the refined educators’ social-emotional learning questionnaire: expanded scope and improved validity Mapping oral feedback interactions in young pupils’ writing A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles Surprising Insights: rethinking Grades, Exams, and Assessment Cultures The conceptualisation implies the statistical model: implications for measuring domains of teaching quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1