Vascular endothelial growth factor: Potential predictor of treatment response in major depression

Anne Clark-Raymond, E. Meresh, D. Hoppensteadt, J. Fareed, J. Sinacore, Brittany Garlenski, A. Halaris
{"title":"Vascular endothelial growth factor: Potential predictor of treatment response in major depression","authors":"Anne Clark-Raymond, E. Meresh, D. Hoppensteadt, J. Fareed, J. Sinacore, Brittany Garlenski, A. Halaris","doi":"10.3109/15622975.2015.1117655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate baseline plasma VEGF levels as a potential predictor of response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. The study also sought to determine whether baseline plasma VEGF would be useful in predicting treatment outcome when two pharmacodynamically diverse agents with established antidepressant efficacy, escitalopram and quetiapine, were administered monotherapeutically to MDD patients. Methods: Two groups of qualifying MDD subjects were enrolled. One group was treated with escitalopram and the other with quetiapine. Plasma concentrations of VEGF were measured using Randox Technologies at baseline, and at weeks 8 and 12 of treatment. Results: We stratified the MDD patients into those who remitted and those who failed to respond. Mean baseline VEGF for the remitters and non-responders was 9.61  and 5.40 pg/ml, respectively (P < 0.0005). Using optimal data analysis a cut score of 7.49 pg/ml for baseline plasma VEGF distinguished remitters from non-responders with a 63% overall accuracy. The remission rate was comparable for both drugs (73 and 81% for quetiapine and escitalopram, respectively). VEGF levels did not significantly change following antidepressant treatment with either escitalopram or quetiapine when measured at 8 and 12 weeks; this result held true for both remitters and non-responders. Conclusions: Our results suggest that VEGF may predict response to antidepressant treatment and may ultimately prove to be a potential biomarker that can be measured with a routine blood draw at the point of service.","PeriodicalId":22963,"journal":{"name":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"38 1","pages":"575 - 585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2015.1117655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate baseline plasma VEGF levels as a potential predictor of response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. The study also sought to determine whether baseline plasma VEGF would be useful in predicting treatment outcome when two pharmacodynamically diverse agents with established antidepressant efficacy, escitalopram and quetiapine, were administered monotherapeutically to MDD patients. Methods: Two groups of qualifying MDD subjects were enrolled. One group was treated with escitalopram and the other with quetiapine. Plasma concentrations of VEGF were measured using Randox Technologies at baseline, and at weeks 8 and 12 of treatment. Results: We stratified the MDD patients into those who remitted and those who failed to respond. Mean baseline VEGF for the remitters and non-responders was 9.61  and 5.40 pg/ml, respectively (P < 0.0005). Using optimal data analysis a cut score of 7.49 pg/ml for baseline plasma VEGF distinguished remitters from non-responders with a 63% overall accuracy. The remission rate was comparable for both drugs (73 and 81% for quetiapine and escitalopram, respectively). VEGF levels did not significantly change following antidepressant treatment with either escitalopram or quetiapine when measured at 8 and 12 weeks; this result held true for both remitters and non-responders. Conclusions: Our results suggest that VEGF may predict response to antidepressant treatment and may ultimately prove to be a potential biomarker that can be measured with a routine blood draw at the point of service.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内皮生长因子:重度抑郁症治疗反应的潜在预测因子
目的:本研究的目的是评估基线血浆VEGF水平作为抗抑郁药物治疗反应的潜在预测因子。该研究还试图确定当两种药效学上不同且具有抗抑郁疗效的药物(艾司西酞普兰和喹硫平)单药治疗重度抑郁症患者时,基线血浆VEGF是否有助于预测治疗结果。方法:选取两组符合条件的重度抑郁症患者。一组用艾司西酞普兰治疗,另一组用喹硫平治疗。在基线、治疗第8周和第12周时,使用Randox Technologies测量血浆VEGF浓度。结果:我们将MDD患者分为缓解组和无效组。缓解者和无反应者的平均基线VEGF分别为9.61和5.40 pg/ml (P < 0.0005)。使用最佳数据分析,基线血浆VEGF切割评分为7.49 pg/ml,以63%的总体准确率区分缓解者和无反应者。两种药物的缓解率相当(奎硫平和艾司西酞普兰分别为73%和81%)。在8周和12周测量时,使用艾司西酞普兰或喹硫平进行抗抑郁治疗后VEGF水平没有显著变化;这一结果对汇款人和无反应者都适用。结论:我们的研究结果表明,VEGF可以预测抗抑郁治疗的反应,并可能最终被证明是一种潜在的生物标志物,可以在服务点通过常规抽血来测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of the immune system in depersonalization disorder Downregulation of lncRNAs Gomafu, NONMMUT033604.2, and NONMMUT064397.2 in the hippocampus of mice with model of post-traumatic stress disorder Ketamine-induced changes in plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are associated with the resting-state functional connectivity of the prefrontal cortex Positive association between cerebral grey matter metabolism and dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability in healthy and schizophrenia subjects: An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fallypride positron emission tomography study Extrapyramidal reactions following treatment with antidepressants: Results of the AMSP multinational drug surveillance programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1