Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB-II) Scoring System in Prediction of Mortality Risk in Preterm Neonates in the First 24 Hour

Firuzeh Faridpour, A. Farahani, M. Rassouli, M. Shariat, M. Nasiri, Mina Ashrafzadeh
{"title":"Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB-II) Scoring System in Prediction of Mortality Risk in Preterm Neonates in the First 24 Hour","authors":"Firuzeh Faridpour, A. Farahani, M. Rassouli, M. Shariat, M. Nasiri, Mina Ashrafzadeh","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2020.45945.2254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The scoring systems evaluate neonatal outcomes based on perinatal factors in the Neonatal Intense Course Unit (NICU). \nAim: This study aimed to predict mortality risk in preterm neonates for the first time, using the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB II). \nMethod: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical, longitudinal study was conducted on 344 preterm neonates with the gestational age of 23-32 weeks and birth weight of 500-1500 g in a referral center in Tehran, Iran, from winter 2016 to spring 2017. Some neonatal variables were completed within the first 12 h of life, and the final scores were calculated based on CRIB II. Then, the correlation of these variables with mortality outcome was evaluated using logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative values were also calculated via SPSS software (version 23). \nResults: According to the results, 253 (73.57%) neonates, including 122 girls (48%), survived in the first 24 h after birth. The total CRIB II score in the surviving neonates was 6.1±2.6. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated at 0.84 with the cut-off point of 8.5. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CRIB II system were obtained as 75%, 78%, 55%, and 89.5%, respectively. The results revealed a significant correlation between the CRIB II score and mortality outcome. In this regard, an increase in the CRIB score coincided with a 0.67 increase in the risk of death (OR=1.671, P<0.001). \nImplications for Practice: Based on the findings of the present study,CRIB II can be concluded to be an appropriate scoring system. Consequently, the result of this tool can be used for routine investigations.","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"201 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2020.45945.2254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The scoring systems evaluate neonatal outcomes based on perinatal factors in the Neonatal Intense Course Unit (NICU). Aim: This study aimed to predict mortality risk in preterm neonates for the first time, using the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB II). Method: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical, longitudinal study was conducted on 344 preterm neonates with the gestational age of 23-32 weeks and birth weight of 500-1500 g in a referral center in Tehran, Iran, from winter 2016 to spring 2017. Some neonatal variables were completed within the first 12 h of life, and the final scores were calculated based on CRIB II. Then, the correlation of these variables with mortality outcome was evaluated using logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative values were also calculated via SPSS software (version 23). Results: According to the results, 253 (73.57%) neonates, including 122 girls (48%), survived in the first 24 h after birth. The total CRIB II score in the surviving neonates was 6.1±2.6. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated at 0.84 with the cut-off point of 8.5. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CRIB II system were obtained as 75%, 78%, 55%, and 89.5%, respectively. The results revealed a significant correlation between the CRIB II score and mortality outcome. In this regard, an increase in the CRIB score coincided with a 0.67 increase in the risk of death (OR=1.671, P<0.001). Implications for Practice: Based on the findings of the present study,CRIB II can be concluded to be an appropriate scoring system. Consequently, the result of this tool can be used for routine investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB-II)评分系统在预测早产儿24小时内死亡风险中的应用
背景:评分系统评估新生儿结局基于围产期因素在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。目的:本研究首次采用婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB II)预测早产儿死亡风险。方法:对2016年冬季至2017年春季在伊朗德黑兰一家转诊中心出生的344名胎龄为23-32周、出生体重为500-1500 g的早产儿进行横断面、描述性分析、纵向研究。一些新生儿变量在出生后12小时内完成,并根据CRIB II计算最终得分。然后,使用逻辑回归评估这些变量与死亡率结局的相关性。敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性值也通过SPSS软件(版本23)计算。结果:新生儿出生后24 h存活253例(73.57%),其中女婴122例(48%)。存活新生儿CRIB II总评分为6.1±2.6。估计受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.84,截断点为8.5。此外,CRIBⅱ系统的敏感性为75%,特异性为78%,阳性预测值为55%,阴性预测值为89.5%。结果显示CRIB II评分与死亡率结果之间存在显著相关性。在这方面,CRIB评分的增加与死亡风险增加0.67相吻合(OR=1.671, P<0.001)。对实践的启示:基于本研究的发现,可以得出结论,CRIB II是一个合适的评分系统。因此,该工具的结果可用于常规调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Care Journal
Evidence Based Care Journal Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Health System: A Systematic Review Comparison of the effect of abdominal massage and Hugo point acupressure on infantile colic symptoms1 Fathers Involvement with Developmental care of their Preterm Newborns and its Impact on the Bonding and Self-Efficacy: a nonrandomized clinical trial The effect of spiritual intelligence training on the hope and self-transcendence in mothers of premature neonates Comparison between Emergency Severity Index plus Capnometer and Emergency Severity Index in the dyspneic patients with Chronic Heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1