Citizenship, Pain, and Disability in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Childrens Literature Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.3390/literature2040025
M. Gauvin
{"title":"Citizenship, Pain, and Disability in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot","authors":"M. Gauvin","doi":"10.3390/literature2040025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizenship is popularly associated with able-bodiedness, both physically and cognitively. However, disability studies over the last few decades has revealed the extent to which the idea of the nation as composed of able-bodied constituents is little more than fantasy, one that can create or galvanize barriers to full political and social participation. Part of this task has involved re-evaluating key works of canonical literature through the lens of disability. In the following paper, I apply this approach to Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and argue that Beckett’s play disrupts not just the fantasy of a nation composed of able-bodied citizens but the language of able-bodiedness itself, which has implications for how we conceive of citizenship and participatory politics. While impairment has been critiqued in Beckett before, the extensive examples of pained and impaired characters in his works have often been subsumed under broader philosophical themes, such as existentialism, nihilism, or Cartesian dualism, and rarely linked to issues of citizenship, politics, or the social and built environment. I explore how Beckett’s approach to theatrical and linguistic performativity contributes to how he staged the experience of pain and disability that has implications for how we conceive of and practice citizenship.","PeriodicalId":40504,"journal":{"name":"Childrens Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childrens Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/literature2040025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citizenship is popularly associated with able-bodiedness, both physically and cognitively. However, disability studies over the last few decades has revealed the extent to which the idea of the nation as composed of able-bodied constituents is little more than fantasy, one that can create or galvanize barriers to full political and social participation. Part of this task has involved re-evaluating key works of canonical literature through the lens of disability. In the following paper, I apply this approach to Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and argue that Beckett’s play disrupts not just the fantasy of a nation composed of able-bodied citizens but the language of able-bodiedness itself, which has implications for how we conceive of citizenship and participatory politics. While impairment has been critiqued in Beckett before, the extensive examples of pained and impaired characters in his works have often been subsumed under broader philosophical themes, such as existentialism, nihilism, or Cartesian dualism, and rarely linked to issues of citizenship, politics, or the social and built environment. I explore how Beckett’s approach to theatrical and linguistic performativity contributes to how he staged the experience of pain and disability that has implications for how we conceive of and practice citizenship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞缪尔·贝克特《等待戈多》中的公民身份、痛苦和残疾
公民身份通常与身体健全和认知健全联系在一起。然而,过去几十年的残疾研究表明,一个国家由健全选民组成的想法在很大程度上只不过是一种幻想,它可能会制造或激发阻碍人们充分参与政治和社会的障碍。这项任务的一部分涉及通过残疾的视角重新评估经典文学的关键作品。在下一篇论文中,我将这种方法应用于塞缪尔·贝克特的《等待戈多》,并认为贝克特的戏剧不仅破坏了一个由健全公民组成的国家的幻想,而且破坏了健全公民的语言本身,这对我们如何理解公民身份和参与性政治有影响。虽然在贝克特的作品中,损伤已经受到了批评,但他作品中大量痛苦和受损人物的例子通常被归入更广泛的哲学主题,如存在主义、虚无主义或笛卡尔二元论,很少与公民身份、政治或社会和建筑环境问题联系起来。我将探讨贝克特对戏剧和语言表演的方法如何有助于他如何上演痛苦和残疾的经历,这对我们如何理解和实践公民身份有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Childrens Literature
Childrens Literature LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capitalism, Ecosocialism and Reparative Readers in Ursula Le Guin’s The Word for World Is Forest Gothic Fairy-Tale Feminism: The Rise of Eyre/‘Error’ All the Better to Eat You with: Sexuality, Violence, and Disgust in ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ Adaptations Interactivity and Influence: A Research on the Relationship between Epitaph (muzhi 墓志) and Mourning Poetry for Deceased Wives in Ancient China As in Forests, So in Verse: Clearings and the Poetics of Lack in Finnish Forest Poetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1